AMD FX at WoT
Please help, it is important to know the question about the level of FPS (FPS) in the game WoT (World of Tanks or light brown. World of tanks) on the AMD FX series processors (based on the architecture Bulldozer)because the combined test performance is presented тут:http://www.overclockers.ru/lab/46433/Tankistam_posvyaschaetsya._Testirovanie_videokart_i_processorov_v_World_of_Tanks.html ignores testing on this type of CPUs. Interiano asked to leave this forum, because I already know the successes of the sandy bridge (Intel Core i3-7 Sandy Bridge) processors in this application. With respect Woodman3451
Ser777
the game has a max fps 127 no longer produces, look at the current min and setting
woodman3451
As the owner of a CPU FX series can now say, WoT is a little better than phenomenon, with almost equal frequency , and noticeably better with a significant overclock (1 GHZ is, like as not
a little?) The minimum FPS increased from 35 to 50, sometimes sour effect is the prohibition to go Wot on the first core, then wind it throwing random other nuclei and the growth could be another 20-50%
But the maximum FPS increased from 70 to 100.
Honestly, at WoT the engine a hell of a curve...
Yesterday Ardi joke was forbidden to climb the game on the first 2 cores, and task Manager threw her on the 3rd module, where 5 and 6 the core she did a split into 2 streams and increased prizvoditelnosti 100% minimum FPS was 80!
What kind of empty talk, why no one finished the model of your graphics card. Really the game is still on a single core, but soon the time may optimizirovat. For example, with ND 5770 1400х900 any AMD processor (2 cores) with a frequency of 3 Hz on ultra settings but will give 20-25 fps, and twice more at a frequency of 3.6 Hz duck as more of the game and is not necessary. But Intel performance is 1.5-2 times, them 2.8 Hz will be enough
armogun
To pull the game on medium at 1600x900 is enough for me slightly overclocked the laptop processor A6-3400m and a predetermined constant frequency of 1.9 GHz and HD6650м on desert maps, FPS around 40, on a wooded or urban 20-30.
So Intel, with its 2.8 GHz is more than enough to download the graphics. But again, everything depends on the curve the game engine.
For example, my FX-8320 at 4.2 GHz it rarely loads the video card more than 70% and the game gives out 45-60FPS, the truth is in 1920x1080 and the maximum
He was going to take the FX8350, and then at Wot on my rotten rock game gives the 15-25фпс regardless of graphics settings.
I have a AMD FX 6300 3.5 ghz and vidyuhi SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 7770 I have the whole game completely on ultra and have 50 - 80 Fps , so it's good on FX
Yes, I'm playing rather suffer on FX4300 and at least you can drive it up to 4.3 but little help and no Intel can't just switch almost everything to change it but no money
FX-8300@4200 MHz+AMD Radeon R7 265 2Gb 1600*900 all settings on high and below 60fps was not.
. The Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P. AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor, 4420 MHz. Memory speed DDR3-1600 (800 MHz) Just 16351 MB. gtx 650 ti boost 2g. 250g ssd+HHD 1tr. BP 750v / tanks max settings on 1280-1024.- min 65 AVG-80-90 (max 127fps-( but only in sniper mode looking at the sky)) SS. who knows (top sync restricts fps to 60 )-read in game settings everything is described.