Discussion of optimization (Horizon: Zero Dawn)
Well, how do you optimize?)Article here: https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/horizon-zero-dawn-test-gpu-cpu
I think a lot of people expected the same level as Death Stranding, but in fact it's more like Assassin's Creed Odyssey, though there was more emphasis on interest, and here's the map.
Yesterday everything was fine, and today I come in and with textures there is some nonsense. Clothes at the NPC begins to ripple, over all the bushes appear rectangles with squares, and the map vertically appears a strip. I thought that the artifacts and cranes of my vidyha had gone. Later he subtracted that all texture problems are solved by removing PSOCache.bin. That's what I did, and it's like it's gone.
But I'm still worried that it might have been artifacts. The video card is expensive, I don't want to lose it. I do not often play and check in another game unfortunately can not. Has anyone ever done that?
(patch and driver latest)
Sogiking
it weeds out quite a large number of potential players. And you don't have to talk about the poor.
Who knows where to find a file with advanced graphics settings or it makes sense to play with the NVDIA control panel?
I played a little bit on 1.03, then 1.05. I didn't notice any difference between the patches.
Licensed wines 10 about 64 ver. 2004, game mode, hardware acceleration of the gp planner on.
The game is from the epic accordingly.
Iron is strictly average. 10400/4.1 GHz, memory 2-channel mode 3700 mgz, [email protected],1 ghz. Playing on Sata sd.
Full HD, Ultra
Next
Quad HD, Ultra
And last, ultra-wide quad hd, 21:9, 5 mp
UWQHD, Ultra
I play in UW'HD with 100% render resolution, with slightly reduced shadows, water and clouds. Less than 60 fps is very rare. I don't notice the difference with the ultra either. It turns out that's the kind of cut on the bench
UWQHD, custom (High-Ultra)
Thomas Sevchenko
Here's a real screenshot of the results of the 7700-year-old man's 7700.
https://forums.playground.ru/horizon_zero_dawn/tech/obsuzhdenie_optimizatsii-993955/#comment-18928291
Let's say you've accelerated your 7700k, but no more than 5.2-,5,3 to the parking lot. Still, he won't give in an honest 4k even 30 fps on the ultras. Because on full xd barely the average phps 60 with drawdowns under 40. Moreover, will not give a stable 30 fps in 4k widyuk 2060 super. In acceleration, it pulls QHD@60fps perfectly, but with a small increase in the resolution, the fps falls a lot.
The only condition under which your iron can possibly go 4k is the adaptive rendering resolution to the desired fps. But with this option it is no longer 4K, and less, the same FHD, but with the stretching of the picture to 4k.
Neo_GSCDLR
Do you even know what the shit you're talking about? the CPU's task is to process the frames per second and only, it does not matter what resolution you play. Here's a normal test from professionals who are just doing this https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/horizon-zero-dawn-test-gpu-cpu and it's still a test without patches Intel Core i7 7700K 4.2 GH gives out 75-94 phps on the same level as top processors specifically in this game. I have it in 4K at 30fps loaded at a maximum of 40%, the more phps the more CPU load at 60fps it will be loaded at 80-90%, go teach the mate part.
Thomas Sevchenko
Oh, what a great website and test!!! 2-nuclear i3 7100 q 10-nuclear i9 10900k, ahahahahahahahaaa! This is at least - laziness and drawn figures, and as a maximum - the wrong testing technique and clinical dementia of the resource workers.
And the built-in banch this site is not satisfied, because it is cached and, blah blah, gives the wrong result.
Do you seriously think that in a game that uses up to 20 threads, there is no difference between two and ten cores/20 threads?! Seriously?? Here's the answer, do you really believe the test from this site?:))
Finally, the last stroke to the competence of the site - the spelling of the 5th-grader-three.
Mat. Part of you needs to teach. (However, it doesn't help, because if there's a in the tower, what the, what's not fucking)
I explained to you from the match that you, if you have 30fts, how the game is capable of doing it. That is, it is not "honest" UHD 4k, but only some zHD.
"The more phps the more the CPU load"
That's not true. And in general, the load of the processor is a very conditional indicator. And a low tep load is rather a negative indicator, especially when the fps are low, below the set frame limit in the game engine or on vertical synchronization.
Your 40% processor load at 30 fps per 4k DSR doesn't mean that the processor will be able to double-resolution or 75 fps to 4k. Slow RAM, for example, can be a weak point.
I had 7700 by 2.9 GHz. Also showed 60 phps in the gat online on UW'HD, but at the same time constantly microfreezes and other nastiness.
In general, while writing quite obvious things, I realized how useless it is to explain something to you. In terms of wasting time. Dunning-Kruger effect, where you think you're the smartest. Sit on your 4-core and high from 1440p@30fps with a kitskel to 4k and output on fhd.
Neo_GSCDLR
I'd take screenshots from my company where I've run Horizon: zero Dawn in 4K and 30 phps but you still wouldn't believe it and say it's a fake photoshop, etc. Especially spoiled from your attacks on the site gamegpu.com/ that's right there all stupid, and you're one smart)))) look other sites with tests the result will be the same, and in general all in the world stupid?????))) Live in your fantasies further. Here's another site draining your ravings https://overclockers.ru/blog/Splash_Attack/show/40078/pk-versiya-horizon-zero-dawn-imeet-sereznye-problemy-s-optimizaciej-komfortnyj-gejmplej-v-1080p-60fps-sposobna-potyanut-lish-gtx-1080-ti there's a CPU test at the end and an article confirming everything I'm saying can still leave links from foreign sites q videos with a 7700k test. it clearly shows that it launches in 4k and how much maximum fps gives this percent on a more powerful videocard. And your mathematical calculations have no evidence elsewhere you will tell.
Thomas Sevchenko
I think he's trying to get you through:
Spoiler
Neo_GSCDLR wrote:
Let's say you've accelerated your 7700k, but no more than 5.2-,5,3 to the parking lot. Still, he won't give in an honest 4k even 30 fps on the ultras. Because on full xd barely the average phps 60 with drawdowns under 40.
1. The processor in this game is loaded impressively, you can say overloaded, it's just a definition for a change of interest, from 80% yes yes, it is considered overloaded and is to be replaced. The processor should have free resources, because the world does not load immediately into RAM, the processor works with files and must have a margin to solve real-time tasks, in order to ensure that the same graphics card works in a timely manner. And there is not only the average FPS, which you poke with the face, but also rare events, minimum and maximum. The video is just average. As a result yes, especially with regard to the congested ingest, the FPS drawdown is the real thing.
Another thing I don't understand is how it linked the resolution to the CPU load, and why 30 frames of the 10-frame thum is harder to cook than 60 frames. I do not understand why, if the emphasis in the graphics card, and the same also have problems - lack of video memory at high resolutions, as a consequence of the appeal to RAM and the same is the indicator of delay (memory and speed).
Neo_GSCDLR wrote:
Slow RAM, for example, can be a weak point.
Such trouble is relevant in the case of amd, access to memory and simple cores. The core of the Raisen 1000 series is quite good, but simple because of the latency, namely, the execution of the group reading the record and copying goes with more delay, hence the friezes, especially relevant with a large amount of data. And he sees that the average FPS is normal (because he is average, that each frame is prepared separately, and for each frame there is time spent, and it can be a difference, for example, we will understand roughly 60 frames of yours, where the preparation of the 1st frame took 10 milliseconds, 2 - 15 milliseconds, ... 10 frame - 24 milliseconds, ... 30 frames - 5 milliseconds, 60 frames - 15 milliseconds (so each, but I took excerpts with problems for visibility). And in the end you see even the average time of the frame. But you may have caught the eye figure of 24 milliseconds (at 10 frames), and it is not 60FPS, this value corresponds to 41 frames or 1/41-0.0243 (no 60, those 16.6 milliseconds). These are rare events that you won't see in your FPS. It may well be a snage. That's why he laughs that the numbers are drawn on the gamegpu portal, and as it comes out.
Move to a wider range of numbers, and then you'll understand it better.
Neo_GSCDLR wrote:
Oh, what a great website and test!!! 2-core i3 7100 q 10-nuclear i9 10900k
If you focus on the graphics card, it's possible. But it looks really stupid, if there is 7700k overloaded at 2.5k, then 7100 there will just sew up, friezes and drawdowns on rare events will be scorched at every turn. I don't believe in equal values with 10900k. So the minimum should be less.
Thomas Sevchenko wrote:
it's still a test without patches Intel Core i7 7700K 4.2 GH gives out 75-94 phps on a par with top processors specifically in this game.
Average. Minimum, maximum and rare events with a frame time graph show. And of course, he will, if the performance is enough, where it will go.
Related to your video. In the video, the minimum is stable at 20 frames. At 4k in the game 50-70% download, at 2.5k - 70-80%, in places during the request of data and loading the territory under 100%. The percentage is already overloaded and is to be replaced. That's my conclusion. In 4k resources are freer.
There is no 10-part download in the bin.
On overclockers generally do not recommend, a lot of lly articles, often hear. Drawn in a page or exel graphics, blank reviews. The seasoned men noted how he had rolled down. Maybe there are good articles, in general, be attentive. I hope I was able to explain something. His comment will be carried out for mate.
Of course, in a compartment with a good prose, high-speed ass and access to it, productive video memory, free resources at the stat (load less than 70%), it is possible to get even 30 good frames. as we found out, the presence of hyperflow is not very positive in the game manifests. The delay in parallelized threads, and in a heavily loaded process appears even more vividly.
Take an example:
Spoiler
VOVAN WOLFovich
Thanks became more than me understandable and yet 7700k for 4k in this game at 30 fps it is quite enough for me it is really 45% loaded tried to switch to 1080r steadily 60 fps well there are very rare landings, the percentage loaded at 80-90% that is already on the verge but still enough. The processor didn't accelerate until I saw the need.
Igruha, with all the patches, remains unrealistically demanding both to the processor and to the video card. And she also loves RAM very much, she just loves it wildly, and the higher the resolution and settings, the stronger. But she especially loves the processor, but at the same time the exhaust from its load is not proportional, i.e. at the maximum I have to give 60 fps at 1440p the game already loads a percentage of over 50%, and at 80 frames it can load it by 56%, and sometimes in some scenes 60 frames, and loads a percentage of 65-70%, often in the game its loading generally flies over 70%, tried to set 720p resolution, the card was loaded at 98%, the percent was loaded at 72% somewhere. Those. as if there is no processor bottleneck, but sometimes during the game there may be freezes for 1-2 seconds, maybe hard already with badges or defragmentation he needs to do, or he just had to restart the computer, but the loading of components is frantic, although the picture is top. I have a mid-level system, I don't even know how people play there on lowlands and especially 4-cores. Here is a vidos from version 1.09.3, recorded the end of the game (if anyone is interested in what is there), as for me the episode that is the most loading the system + ran like that in the summer and in the winter, shot at the animals
The gamer in the test produced 40-42 fps.! all on - high - Full HD, except reflection - medium. anti-aliasing - auto. At 8300.1060 (3gb) 16ram. Win / 10. pirate. from the torrent (khatab) oto Sila! didn't wait ...
alien367
Well, yes, with 3 gigs of video memory, at high xD
I have 4GB and it does not allow for high - set maximum
guys, I need help. in short, some kind of crap is not understandable ..... not understandable for me.
in general, such a set of
BIOS: AVCN19WW (V1.09) (type: UEFI)
Processor: Intel (R) Core (TM) i7-8750H CPU @ 2.20GHz (12 CPUs), ~ 2.2GHz
Memory: 16384MB RAM
Available OS Memory: 16304MB RAM
Page File: 7446MB used, 11800MB available
Windows Dir: C: Windows
DirectX Version: DirectX 12
Card name: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Chip type: GeForce RTX 2060 lags
at minimums. at first nothing seems to be playable, but after 10 minutes, everything ... starts just wild trash ...
Salmon ..... Assassin's Creed Odyssey was generally played normally on settings above average at a resolution of 3840 x 2160, but what happened to the computer I don't understand
at all in cyberpunk the same bullshit, 10 minutes and the pain comes
polyhedral
apparently little RAM and video memory, they get clogged and your whistle starts, lower the settings, rtx 2060 is not at all for 4k and your percentages are rather weak. Is this a laptop?
The game came out really cool and beautiful, only with patches it was brought to mind for more than a year, was it really impossible to immediately release a normal polished product? Today, in principle, in order to enjoy all the beauties of the game, top cards are required, but also on medium cards (the tops and near the tops of the last generation are quite playable)
Say what you don’t say, but the optimization in this game will soon break through the skies !!!! And it will be equal to doom and wolf! All new games would have such epic graphonies, gameplay and performance!
Gott Mit Uns wrote:
but optimization in this game will break through the skies soon !!!! And it will be equal to doom and wolf!
Don't talk nonsense. This game got its optimization only after a million patches, why did you attach a video with i9 10900kf and 3080ti if even the most non-optimized games can handle such a config. In general, the show is not counted.