American cartoons
Here I watch a cartoon like South Park, the Griffins, and I think what idiots did this shit. Stupid films in general,and young people watch and become dull. I personally got tired of this transition to Soviet cinema and I advise you who did not switch.
Ind.uz RajKapoor
Yes, so that children understand that the world cannot be as good as it seems to them. 1 your version is simply unrealistic in reality). But option 2 is very real, tk. a terrible person can come out of a good ... Children should be taught to live, and not make them good idiots.
An old and grossed out topic. Some people are used to cartoons for children. Hence all the problems and the stench in the direction of outhouse-satirical series like South Park, Family Guy and others. Hence the stench towards Japanese animation or "anime".
Another topic is that Russian animation does not "mature" and never "matured". The overwhelming number of cartoons is the rape of fairy tales five times, both ours and European ones. I remember the moment when I got sick of domestic animation and decided to watch "Berserk". It was an unforgettable experience.
the princess raises her voice and breaks the bird.
Here, perhaps, I agree. In Soviet cartoons, there are either no antagonists at all, or at the end they realize their misfortune and are corrected. In America, the really frequent displays of death should cause laughter, which in itself is an oxymoron. "Shrek" is not the most striking example here, as it cannot be called a purely children's cartoon, but there are many elements of violence and murder in the same harmless "Chip and Dale".
But, again, you should not try to look for a conspiracy in this. It's just a traditional Hollywood school.
In general, I liked to watch action films. Especially with Jean-Claude Van Damme. I remember very well in the third grade for the first time a full-length cartoon appeared in cinemas. The flick seems to be about some fucking ant. Personally, I didn't like this kind of bullshit even then. Purely according to the plot. I didn’t like all this kind of nonsense, and even more and usually present in such cartoons moments about which Ind.uz RajKapoor told. Moreover, it was in the cartoon itself that everything was furnished that everything was cool and all that. For example, I liked the militants even then, although there was shooting and murder, but there is no such insolent nonsense. Although then I was still potsreot and the movie Rambo 2 and Rambo 3 I did not like. I could not digest Russian fighters. The brigade is generally nonsense. Brother-2 just liked it. Well, you know because of what two points)))
I don't understand how the other kids watched these shitty cartoons. And up to 16-17 years. "Children")))
Russian animation does not "mature" and has never "matured". The dead remain young.
Children should be taught to live, and not to make them good idiots? Everything has its time. What can cruelty teach someone who is not aware of the consequences of their actions?
I recall a case when a couple of boys, eight years old, took a three-year-old apart for parts. It was probably interesting how it was done. Also, on the hike, the cartoons were revised about a mouse gutting a cat, after which he runs around, collects intestines.
requiemmm
"The dead stay young"
Heh, right. As if sovkodrochery and potsreoty did not blather, but the fatherly animation has long died. The latest vyser like "Alesh Popovich" and other rubbish only prove this.
Raccoon gargle
I, too, honestly do not understand how you can watch this garbage under the names Alvin and the Chipmunks, Season of the Hunt and so on. Why the hell are my 7th graders still watching this. This is crap for grades 3, 4. Some kind of horror, Duc also laugh at the cartoons. I laughed in cartoons only in South Park and family guy, and even then rarely.
I laughed in cartoons only in South Park and the family guy.
It has already been said that these are non-childish cartoons.
By the way, there is great humor for all generations in the animated series about SpongeBob. I advise you to watch ;-)
Ind.uz RajKapur
I want to take the well-known cartoon title "Shrek". Most of those sitting on PG think they watched this movie.
Cartoon. Yes, we did.
If you look at the child (brother or sister, next to whom you sat and watched this cartoon), you can see how he laughs and laughs at this moment.
1. Some things, in principle, are always funny, even when it is impossible to laugh due to ethical considerations. For example, a man walked and fell. Moreover, it doesn't matter who it is. The main thing is that he fell. Fell, stumbled = funny. This is a natural reaction that has its own justification from the point of view of psychology and history ...
2. Children are not yet aware of many things, so they are forgiven. True, it is better not to show Shrek himself (cartoon) until a certain age. The cartoon is not for youngsters, that's for sure.
The main heroine of Soviet fairy tales cannot be treacherous, she cannot kill an animal cruel, but on the contrary shows her love for animals.
Yes, the resonance is palpable to the naked eye.
Glasgow
I remember the moment when I got sick of domestic animation and decided to watch "Berserk". It was an unforgettable experience.
Because it was something completely new for you. Well, how is Coca-Cola for someone who always drank only freshly squeezed juices and did not know what a drink with bubbles is ...
requiemmm
Children should be taught to live, and not make them kind idiots?
You must first determine the character of the child and his psychotype, so to speak. From this, and then make a start in drawing up ... a program for its all-round development (sounds strange, I know :)).
2 Your Majesty
It has already been said that these are not children's cartoons.
I would convey this truth to all parents who allow their children to watch Western cartoons ...
It depends on what American cartoons. For example, old ones like "Tom and Jerry" I like. As a child, I watched "Well, wait a minute," but when I saw "Tom and Jerry, I realized that he was better, whatever you say. I like that, for example, in" Tom and Jerry ", unlike" Well, wait a minute "there are no clearly positive and clearly negative characters.
The author pushed the fig ?! South Park has become a children's cartoon !?
For some reason he seemed to me an exclusively adult cartoon ridiculing many of the vices of today's world order. It's not a series, it's just a reflection of a particular situation that is relevant at the time of the release of the cartoon.
If we really take stupid cartoons, then this is "Tom and Jerry" "Woody Woodpecker" and the like ... But at the same time the full-length "Tom and Jerry" turned out to be very interesting and very favorably differs from the "TV series".
If you look closely, there are not so many "stupid" cartoons, not a small part carries the same ideological load and tries to teach anything good or just has a good and interesting plot.
Although Pinky and Brain I liked it - not a covered banter over the invaders of power, and some phrases from there are worthy of writing in a notebook, especially "if I had an airplane, I would fly away, if I had an aluminum plant, I would build an airplane .. . "
judging by the stratifications ... this topic, before crashing to the bottom of the chatterbox, once rose in the Society)
Paul Langerhans
The cartoons that you listed are drawn, firstly, for an adult audience, and secondly, they are predominantly aimed at the American audience, because they have a lot of satire and self-criticism about their shortcomings. We obserae such cartoons because we do not understand this humor, and we do not understand it because we live in a different country, in a different culture with our own shortcomings, we live in different conditions.