Operative caching

Listoman Of
course, that with 1 bar for a kukuryazhenka, which is simply unrealistically dependent on the PSP, the fps will drop in comparison with channel 2
You're wrong, there were complaints about the I5 9400F with the same friezes at one bar, AMD has nothing to do with the requirements for games have grown in 10 years.

X_ray_83
For all modern processes, the topic of informational "starvation" is relevant due to low PSP, it's just that for 1/2/3 of the cuckoo girls it is more pronounced than for the intol process)

KosiakS
In his case, the memory is cached in a large volume, due to the lack of bandwidth! But this is difficult for him)))

KosiakS
This is understandable, and quite adequate when a 10-ka eats 2-4GB. But 12 out of 16? This is no longer the norm

X_ray_83
Ryzen 5 2600, if it helps a lot)

Listoman
just for 1/2/3 kukuryazhenki it is more pronounced than for intol percentages) Expressed
on all processors especially about 10900K 4 bars are better than 2 bars, you can test it all for a long time))

X_ray_83 Cached

because there is free memory and has nothing to do with throughput.

-Hemp-
So even more so))) Ryzen on 1 bar is a pain in applications and games)))
Ideally, to have a profit of 4 bars of 8 gig 3200Hz and the plane will be like in the video and shown, you shouldn't have skipped it.

Kosiak's
ability has nothing to do with it.
The memory is not freed faster than it should, and that's why it gets stuck))) Riley is so difficult !?

-Hemp-
On your screen you can see that only 2.6 GB is occupied.

X_ray_83
It is debatable here, because some megapixels will better drive 2 bars, while others will be better than 4 bars, but with tight timings, the rank of memory still plays a role, individually for each bundle of percent + memory + mother, ideally, of course, you can find a better bunch and advise taking only it, but not everyone has the opportunity to do this, and the difference in the price of an ideal set always exceeds the theoretical profit by several times)

X_ray_83
Yes, I can't believe that single-channel affects the workload so much. 12GB of cache, with no open applications? Do you want to say that Windows with their services can pollute the operative so much? Rave

I honestly now throw 6k into the wind)

KosiakS
The faster the VRAM and DRAM memory, the more it is available in fact, I thought everyone understood this (((

-Hemp-
Yes, maybe this is what happens in the stock, after the fixes the cache does not fly beyond 3GB)

Listoman
And what to do that?)

-Hemp-
I already wrote above)
Download w10 tweaker, and then point by point)

Listoman
Maybe you can use a third-party software to see which processes are caching?

-Hemp-

There is no need to "tune" anything, the system will decide what to use free memory for.

Listoman
Nothing helped)