Processor problem.
There is a video card Gigabyte GeForce GT 730.Will such a processor be enough for it:
Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU 3.40GHz (2-core).
enough, but not enough for games
, since 2010-11,
purely because the processor may not be compatible with them, as well as 64-bit op systems.
Problems with the processor are overheating, physical damage, throttling, etc., but you have a different question. The rules for creating a topic on the forum were too lazy to read?
There are a lot of options for this vidyahi, even within the framework of one manufacturer, very much - clarify its characteristics (type of memory and its volume, frequencies, bandwidth), although without exact characteristics I can say that the card is not a game card, and even percent. also.
VITYA_KOLYADENKO
32 bit stump 4 and dual stump. I just at one time wanted a stump d only 3.6 GHz, but I was very persistently persuaded to take the cor 2 duo a hell of a lot.
then I sucked at the issue for a very long time with the installation of 64 bit visible for 6 gibob ozu. but it turned out that 32-bit processes were not widespread and therefore Windows.
there was still some kind of dual core with him, I find it difficult to say which architecture it belongs to.
MunchkiN 616
In theory, all Pentium Ds are 64-bit no worse than the one introduced by the Prescots.
Core Duo (mobile predecessors of Core 2 Duo) were just 32-bit, that is, they did not leave the Pentium 3 in this parameter.
Although I agree that the distribution of 64-bit operating systems did not become large until the share of Win 7 reached 5%.
VITYA_KOLYADENKO
hmm ...
on the site of the hemp site it is said that the last hemp 4 and hemp D support 64 bit instructions,
but the fact that they have an 800 MHz bus versus 1000 for duals also means that they could be overclocked to shit,
maybe all these years I stayed in the pitch of ignorance
MunchkiN 616
I didn't understand who had 1000.1066 was 955/965. Some of the 900 series chased up to 7 GHz it seems (world records, against the background of CedarMil 8.2 GHz like). That is, such a figure was difficult to achieve for the Conroe and Wolfdale families. Ivy doesn't seem to take that much on nitrogen either (but this record seems to be beaten by 32nm AMD). And I don't know much about overclocking at 14 nm.
MunchkiN 616
ZY Someone says that they drove the 820 to the 1066 bus without raising the voltage.
But the overclocking is as follows:
http://occlub.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=2478
"Valid at 5740 MHz and not very impressive test results."
VITYA_KOLYADENKO
all Intel processors eternal to me except for the eksrim series are stupid to drive on the bus.
Using an experienced pitch method, I found that if overclocking is not limited to the TPP and the voltage limit on the motherboard mat, it is limited by the FSB bus wax
from the motherboard mat asus p5b (not deluxe), I took overclocking on the bus somewhere up to 1200. I don’t remember exactly.
the processor itself was an intel cor 2 duo 6600. it had 2.4 GHz FSB 1066 characteristics. in the end I overclocked it to 3 GHz, so then everything started to work unstable. in parallel, I experimented with bus overclocking and lowering the reference frequency. I also had an elite memory, it was catching up to 900 mmhz with something. but I realized that such a processor would not drive me.
then I bought a gigabyte x48. he already had a maximum FSB of 1600.
however, the 9650 3GHz square processor had a 1333MHz bus. for this reason, whoever buys newer processors from 1333 for budget motherboards does not succeed in overclocking
because the system will go off scale as in this picture
http://pix.playground.ru/other/701788/.
there are no results of overclocking. but he most extreme chased up to 3.6 GHz. and which is no longer a newer pursued accordingly.
MunchkiN 616
I remember something about the cool motherboard. Here's about it:
https://www.overclockers.ru/lab/24658.shtml
Here the FSB limit was 650 instead of 200/267.
In practice, the following frequencies have been achieved:
SpoilerAsus Commando started without any problems and loaded the operating system up to a frequency of 500 MHz and even passed some tests, but there is no need to talk about stability at this frequency. Even with a decrease in the processor multiplier to x6, the board could not boast of reliability at a bus frequency of 495 MHz. Since the multiplier was lowered, the processor could not serve as a limiting factor. I suppose it’s not a matter of memory, since at this frequency it worked even with 4-4-4-12 timings, and during testing they increased to 5-5-5-15. In addition, replacing the memory with a Corsair TWIN2X1024-8000UL with half the size also did not help improve the results. The stability was achieved at a bus frequency of 490 MHz; there was no need to decrease the multiplier for this.