Mixing console for streaming from the console

As far as I know, all this is done in the same OBS, but inconvenient. So there is a mixing console in general, why do you need a device such as a mixing console? Your sound card is normal, i.e. can I connect a mixer to it? And on the same midi controller, you can do this.

I only think of a capture card for pitch and desktop streaming through a capture card with a capture window stretched over the area and outputting an image from the console to a second monitor or TV.
if we are talking about a remote control from the couch, then there seems to be no such thing on the pitch now, and in the capture cards too.

MunchkiN 616 wrote:
if we are talking about a remote control from a sofa, then there seems to be no such thing now on the pitch
Well, not necessarily from the sofa, but there is something like StreamDeck, as I understand it is exactly what he needs. But it is not clear how much he is a successful streamer that he is ready to give that kind of money, and if you take the new NEXUS AX310 avermedia model, the price doubles. Convenient of course, but I'm not a streamer to judge whether it's worth it.

Magdeburg
As I said, all this can be organized through a regular mixing console. How convenient it will be xs. But it seems to me that StreamDeck is not a convenient thing at all, although it is necessary to look at it for an overview. But the NEXUS AX310 is already clear and convenient, and in terms of settings, it is more versatile or something.

Magdeburg wrote:
StreamDeck, as I understand it, is exactly what he needs.
I looked at this stub, and did not quite understand how it works, the price tag is lower than that of the AX310, but is this a remote control at all? very strange adapted rather for switching between platforms, but not for sound, there each button is programmed as a keyboard shortcut as understood (or something like that)

Petruxinson wrote:
But it seems to me that StreamDeck is not a convenient thing at all.
But this model has been sitting on it for 5 years already, apparently due to lack of choice. Of course the functionality and capabilities are outdated.
DiaconZ wrote: the
price tag is lower than that of the AX310 but is this a remote control at all?
Well, yes, a mixing console, see the avermedia model, the same version is only at times functional and convenient, there is even a touch screen.

Magdeburg
And here is the lack of choice, if I wrote to you above how all this can be implemented, the main thing is to include ingenuity.
DiaconZ wrote:
but not as not for sound, there each button is programmed as a key combination as understood (or like that)
Plus each button displays information, there is a screen in each button, but I still do not understand where all this could be applied to how much is convenient. As I already said in terms of convenience, the AX310 is just a must-have. But of course it costs money.

Petruxinson wrote:
And here is the lack of choice, if I wrote to you above how all this can be implemented, the main thing is to include ingenuity.
Have you tried to implement this? And I myself realized that it would hardly be convenient for a streamer, because in a regular mixing console you work only with sound, you cannot display the necessary information on the buttons or launch any program.
Petruxinson wrote:
but I still do not understand where all this could be applied and how convenient it is.
here you can see, the avermedia model is just much more modern, there is already a full-fledged touch screen and control it as you want, there is even a chat.

Magdeburg wrote:
Have you tried to implement this? And I myself realized that this is unlikely to be convenient for a streamer, because in an ordinary mixing console you work only with sound, there you will not display the necessary information on the buttons or you will not start any program.
I tried it just like you did. But I'm telling you how you can do it. Convenience is another matter of course. If the vehicle feels sorry for money, for example, for the AX310, then you will have to get used to StreamDeck. I fully support that the nexus is many times more functional, but they also ask for it decently.

Petruxinson wrote:
If the vehicle feels sorry for money, for example, for the AX310, you will have to get used to StreamDeck.
So he mostly needs to work with sound in order to connect a professional microphone, the same vocal ones. And they require their own connection like XLR and there is one on the avermedia mixer, but I don’t know if it is in the Elgato model.

Magdeburg
You probably misunderstood him. Read again what he needs. YES, and you can simply connect a microphone to a sound card, if it is normal, not built-in naturally. He just needs to adjust the sound during the broadcast, add, for example, to a game, to a microphone, and hardly anything. Here, in theory, StreamDeck is suitable, but it will be more convenient through the AX310

Petruxinson wrote: As I see it,
StreamDeck
is some kind of quick access panel, which has nothing to do with adjusting the sound, namely the sound by channels, without an additional monitor, the sense that these buttons are configured there, even a dude on the stream has several monitors, AX310 is just what you need.

DiaconZ wrote:
as I see it, this is some kind of quick access panel, which has nothing to do with adjusting the sound, sound through channels, without an additional monitor,
so it is, it's just that there is quick access to work with video, various functions, like in the nexus, where everything is displayed on the touch screen. So the nexus is 2 in 1, but the price is one and a half times more expensive. Those. who wants to save money and work only with the video functionality, elgado is probably also suitable.

DiaconZ
Here the point is that you need to configure everything and get a little confused. Yes, it will not be very convenient to control, but it will still work. And if you don't want to bother, then take the Nexus.

Petruxinson
I do not know what you are going to tune there, this is an elgado panel - just a panel, where are the volume controls on it? where are the audio levels on the tracks shown there? the AX310 has it all, so I will take it, without any problems, everything is clear and simple

DiaconZ wrote:
sound on it? Where are the audio levels on the tracks shown there? the AX310 has it all, so I'll take it.
If working with sound is important, of course the nexus is out of competition. There is no need to buy any amplifiers or sound cards separately, everything is in stock, only the main thing is to have a high-quality microphone. And in the software there are a lot of sound settings.