Intel or AMD

if I choose from the proposed assemblies, I would choose amd. because 8-16 is as much as modern consoles, and for the reign pitch, I would like to have 12-24 thread cores, at least 16-32 is better to look pretentious. They want some rumors that AMD has performance problems, but I think they will be solved by special overclocking, so because of the attractiveness of the AMD price, I would prefer it. From the minus, as I understand it, AMD does not have an AVX for 512 bit calculations. they are at Intel.
moving on to the assembly of what kind of peck I bought, and none of the proposed ones, probably, does not say what the ward is and what memory you can choose a current of 16-64 gigabytes of some kind of memory. I usually don't like assemblies and would like to rule and own the pitch myself as I see fit.

saa0891
If the assembly with AMD was 5900x, then I would write "take it".
But 3900x lags behind 11900k quite seriously in games. With the 3080ti video card, in some games the difference in fps will be up to 20% in favor of 11900k.

Space Marine wrote:
If 5900x were in the assembly with AMD
Yes, I just gave links as an example, what budget and config I need approximately, I ask about what percentage and in what bundle, mother, the best to take opera, if Intel I rummage around, then Ryzen is not, and for a long time I have not followed what pieces of iron have come out lately.

There's no point. There are no DDR5 processors yet.

Marsj The
same thing was said a year or two ago about buying rtx 2000 and rx 5000.
"It makes no sense, new video cards are coming out soon, wait, there it will be a nextgen for a pittance." Yeah.
As a result, chelas are now sitting on their 570-580 ryks and on GTix 1050-1063 and enjoying cyberpunks at 20-30 fps, and writing posts about "poor optimization" in new games.

When platforms on ddr5 come out there, how much will it all cost, will it be generally available to the general public in the early years? The experience of past years and the current state of the industry have already shown that waiters may not even wait until old age. If you need it now, buy it now.

saa0891
There is nothing to think about here. Intel in this case is much better for gambling. It would be 5900 as they wrote, then one would think

saa0891
Especially about Intel, you know everything, so you shouldn't look at risen, in games they + are equal depending on the game

There is not much difference if you change the processor.
RX 6800XT | I7 7700K vs I7 8700K vs I9 9900K vs I9 10900K
Spoiler
Change the video card if fps is not enough.
GTX 1080 vs RTX 2080 vs 3080
Spoiler

saa0891
Your 7700K is now leaking Ryzen 1600! For you, any AMD Ryzen will be faster))

X_ray_83
Ryzen 2600 (OC) vs Intel 7700K (OC) vs Ryzen 2700 (OC) vs Ryzen 2600X (OC) Asus ROG Strix 1080
Spoiler

Space Marine
agrees, I didn’t listen to anyone and wait, I purchased the assembly now, BETTER NOW AND IMMEDIATELY THAN THEN AND NEVER))))))))

saa0891
I will say this, now I bought a computer on I7 11700KF, the flight is excellent, the most amazing thing, I use it without overclocking and without boost in BIOS, everything works with a bang,

Marsj wrote: Not much
difference if you change the processor.
In any case, there is a difference, 8 cores are still much better, and my system engineer is already 5 years old, in any case it is time to change it, and it is much easier and more profitable to sell it entirely than to sell it in parts.
Marsj wrote:
Change video card if fps is not enough.
If you change the vidyahu, in any case, you also have to change the power supply unit, as I said, it's just an extra hemorrhoid, in the end, there remains old stuff, and the hardware still pulls the toy normally, but I don't want to check how much it will work, plus, again, bitcoin will jump then at all you will have to buy at exorbitant prices.

saa0891
PIOGUGLI Z270 coffee mod and calmly put 6/12 8700k there. With Ali there are engineers 9900 the same is.

Heh, right now, amd is taking. Best price-performance ratio. The Intels are gluttonous insane and require a very lumpy package. Take Amudu at least 5. All sho below is suitable for office Toko. have you finally seen STE? 11 is even worse!
Spoiler
Priced at 11900k, it costs 5900X. Are you kidding me? You don't need to drive AMD and select a top-end board, and it is good friends with the RAM. Although the 11900K has the most powerful core. I also thought to change, as a result, Intel has a successful 10th generation Toko, 11 turn away.
You take the ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING and 5900X and only crucial ballistix 3600 CL16 (2x16 ONLY). You will find Samsung, the same is not against, starting from 3200 C14. We can take 4000. 32 giga, do not take less. And sales do not need to be poured into an expensive power supply unit, as for Intel, with a motherboard (power supply) and cooling. We can generally take 5800X, al for a game of 100% is enough. The rest should be poured into the vidyuhu, if the game pitch.
Heh, about the cores. Koneshno kernels are better than any threads. Streams have always been marketing, games have been based on the core, not streams.
X_ray_83 wrote:
Your 7700K is now draining Ryzen 1600. For you, any AMD Ryzen will be faster))
What is faster? 6 cvore in microsoft office feel great. True, I noticed
STE on my office 3600. Marsj wrote:
Ryzen 2600 (OC) vs Intel 7700K (OC) vs Ryzen 2700 (OC) vs Ryzen 2600X (OC) Asus ROG Strix 1080
2600, heh, drawn graphics without smoothness. well, well, well, common sense and facts came out of the chat.

Do not take less than 5000 amd! AUTHOR LOOSE! I don't know a single game pitch on samples below 5000 amudesh. Below - DISAPPOINTMENT !!!! In comparison, even with the old people, and who got burned, flooded the forums with friezes and questions about what to change. The owners of 1000 and 2000 changed at least by 3000, and the cool viewing PC channels advised taking intel - 9600, 9900, and against 3600 take 10400. Now the reverse 5000 - take the norms! All our peka boyars take only a novelty !!!!
Always collect your pitch and never take a ready-made nounname !!!

Hellhound_Anger
"What is faster? 6 cvore in microsoft office feel great. True, I noticed STE from my office 3600."
12 streams and it's not just the office but video decoding as well as working with archives, for example!

And this is especially true in 2021 with YouTube and others.

Hellhound_Anger
7700K is the most suitable for Photoshop export is faster, but for video it is already weak.

X_ray_83 wrote:
12 streams and it's not just the office but video decoding as well as working with archives, for example!
Well, I wrote OFFICE. A job, heh. We do this sometimes. Although we have cheap 3600 tires for this, it will be better. I finally set ultmatums to the boss before, with friends, he finally wanted to humiliate us by installing rubber series 1 and 2 (zena 1), I said at least zen 2. And as toys, and I am more on their part, so intol, and I had 3770 and 6700 and 8700 and 9900, then 10700. And then 10900. Bratyuns drive 5000 tires against new Intel. And I’ve cooked with tempras and accelerations, I thought I’d take 11900 for myself, but even changed my mind. Let's see what there will be in the new am5 and 1700! But right now I would take either 5900 or 5950X. Even the stoves pulled me up, but I love a lot of cores, especially turning off these streams, and finally drags me into frequencies, overclocking, and games!
I didn’t even notice where the comments are about coding and Photoshop and working with archives. Tutachi 1080Ti, it is rather a game pitch for him, and not an office one.

take the i7-10700f and the rest of it.
AMD is a sin to take.