Replacement parts

RAM another 8 gigs to add,none have to replace the power unit more powerful,750 and later,a mother and last to leave...
And prices look at the website DNS...

Deliano
I'm so refreshed. Was 2400 core i5, 12 gig RAM DDR 3, video card gtx 780 ti, the mother a cheap, 2 sdisney 120 (wind) and 240 (game) and dvuhterabaytny under WD torrents

bought:

core i5 9600К 19500
motherboard ASUS 5500 E. hero
Suska some kind of Corsair 16 gigs ддр4 (model not remember) 7000
video card Palit RTX 2060 27000

just 60 keys came out. I think that at the moment it's more or less budget pitch to full HD with a margin of 3-4 years, well, some igrulki, the same metro Exodus you can play with the rays though not ultra, but definitely high settings comfortably. under 2K and 4 to the need to collect more abruptly

I5 9600k worth taking if you want to have some reserve for the future. For 4 years it just enough for full HD. But the mother will have to pay in this case for buy 9600к not use all its charms I do not see sense. All will cost around 26-28k. If you think to change a couple of years then 9400f and cheapest mother will keep it under 15-16K. RAM for Intel is not so critical, take the cheapest, of three models 8. If desired, and 30 minutes of time you can safely overclock to a 3000, and if you're lucky then to 3400Мгц. This is where the Ocala 6K will be released. Cooler for 9400f will fit any, you can take the box version. Well, or hipoly deepcool gammaxx 300 will handle it 100%. For 9600к need something serious, within 2-3K watch. Well, the most important videocarta. If you do not disdain BU the market for 20 - 25K you can even find 1080ти. And in your price range and obvious 2070 if you take 9400f well 2060 if 9600к. I personally recommend to take 9400f and 2070. This variant will be cheaper by a couple thousand, and the fps vids more. Games play now, not in future and what will happen in a couple of years, when will the new console is not known. Maybe it will be like in 2006, when the quality of graphics has increased significantly, and perhaps as in 2013, like the console and came out in terms of graphics, nothing has changed.

bazilews
Block 750? My not enough?) I do not know, how there with consumption of the processor and the Mat. card but card the next generations asking less than my right now) the idea was to change only the video card (1070 or 2060) because my current was the artifacts periodically to issue, and of 8 operatives to add. But I wonder, can replace the charge and a CPU, although a lot of people said that they are still quite a serve and quite relevant.

Zh1VaGo
Thanks for the detailed answer
Disdain BU.. of Minary etc, it is dangerous..) And under my current stats what graphics card to you? Watched 1660ti at all.. 1070 or 2060. More powerful I don't need. I'm enjoying it in Vedmochka to run almost at ultra without HW, or, in WOW, Metro. Or to pay 60-70 for a full upgrade, or 25-30 on the graphics card + RAM.
Monitor 1920x1080

Deliano wrote:
although a lot of people said that they are still quite a serve and quite relevant.
The processor bus 5 GT/s for a long time already is not relevant.

Zh1VaGo
Zh1VaGo wrote:
I5 9600k worth taking if you want to have some reserve for the future.
Processor performance as a 4790k 4/8. Stock....
Zh1VaGo wrote:
RAM for Intel is not so critical, take the cheapest, of three models 8
Yeah, of course. Tell tales to people. At least 3200 to take. Generally, if perfectly straight, then 3600 to take.


bazilews
bazilews wrote:
the power unit is more powerful,750
Since when is 650 watts not enough? If the power only is reduced, where 750 W stick decided? 650W for SLi gtx 1080 enough.

Deliano
So it will be better:

Deliano wrote:
Watched 1660ti at all
1660Ti generally thousands of 16-18 will be available at CU will be easy.
Deliano wrote:
Block 750? My not enough?) I do not know, how there with consumption of the processor and the Mat. card but the video card next generations ask for less than my now
Enough is enough. Blurted out too much. Importantly, the prevention did.

VOVAN WOLF
Thank you for your answer. Still better than a full upgrade to do? Than to change the card..

Deliano
Those games that you listed, just to put a new map and the bar of RAM. The is 2060 with i3 7100, the Witcher quietly on ultra 60 + fps with the included hair. Only in the city where some 50 sinking, because a lot of assets. Your CPU has 4 threads, not remove. And your percent safely cope with these games. In metro last same situation. All percent I have rested. And the fps fluctuated wildly. Just in the end put a lock on 30 fps and passed. For the entire game not once below is not about the village (extra settings without rays). And your percent think I should take out and subway quietly, closer to 60 fps. So if these games take 2060 and not PORSA much.

Deliano
Deliano wrote:
Thank you for your answer. Still better than a full upgrade to do? Than to change the card..
You're welcome. Which is better, decide for yourself. I can't decide for You. I changed my 4790k at 8700k. Answer the questions:
- What happens if this happens?
- What happens if it doesn'T happen?
- Why NOT if it will happen?
- Why NOT if it will happen?
Sravnenie:https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-3770K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-9600K/1317vs4031
New is always better. To think it is. New games are more demanding. Rest on personal feelings watch. New hardware is more efficient, with lower power consumption, better performance in FPS and smoothness.
8GB Opera little. Percent old, performance on the core 1600S. The price is 6000 rubles percent.

Zh1VaGo
Zh1VaGo wrote:
The is 2060 with i3 7100, the Witcher quietly on ultra 60 + fps with the included hair
No there is 60 frames, and FPS is not an indicator. This is how games are tested, with the performance - 0.1% / 1% min FPS and frame time. We'll see, the minimum FPS
Example:
Dual-core i3-7100 pulls the Witcher 3 comfortable picture.
Spoiler

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
Dual-core i3-7100 pulls the Witcher 3 comfortable picture.
Where did you get that?
After all, there is an emphasis in the GPU 100%

VOVAN WOLF

All right, more than 60 fps gives.

Aloska
It should be written in Novigrad. There are even batches no. The video is not informative and empty. There is no indicators of smoothness - 0.1 and 1, no time frame. Pals school show these meaningless vidosic.
By the way, in the video the smoothness is not felt. Add indicators of smoothness. There are 35-40 staff and load up to 60-70%. 60 frames under 90-100, especially in areas more populated. Hunting in this logogram to play.

VOVAN WOLF
And if I live anything informative saw.

well you can buy another memory kit 2 channel podrzavati processor to run what ever ifors 2070ртх good ohladom this will be limited
a full upgrade is better to do when you get the next console Tama you can see their rate climb requirements it will be possible to run some sort of corn 3800х

VOVAN WOLF
To pay dough overmanage whatever time of 60 minutes was less Frisians, okeeey.
I've got something to prove?
The game is smooth => 60 fps.
Did you prove something is bad or detrimental.
No one (reasonable) would not take in a bundle to 9900K 1060 or 8700k
Because it's stupid and impractical.

VOVAN WOLF
Well according to your link, there YOU are humiliated, and showed that 0.1 and 1% purely for the professionals who terebonkayut at the numbers.

VOVAN WOLF
As you imagine it, saw a 0.1 fps on their system less than 9900k 20 shots and immediately ran for the percent at 600$? and the new nurse?
You that the marketer of the Intel?

Deliano
if you want to live anywhere stable fps and a small reserve for the future in FullHD, it makes sense to change to 9600 and 2060.
otherwise, leave the percent. it is more work. stick 1660ti (if FullHD, again), and the balance next year to take ps5.

Aloska
Aloska wrote:
To pay dough overmanage whatever time of 60 minutes was less than Frisians
That is something to compare i5-9600k on 6 cores and i3-7100 on 2/4. Figase. You generally are adequate? With the CPU under 100% may not be a smooth image and You showed it in your video and I got rid of it is visible!
Video Your bottom - there is no camera rotation, no mixes, no city. He would have ran and looked at the sky.
Aloska wrote:
No one (reasonable) would not take in a bundle to 9900K 1060 or 8700k
What can I say like this? What have these processors. There is a balance. 8700 is a little - 20,000 worth, 9600k - 16 000 rubles. I'm not talking about 9900k.
Aloska wrote:
The game is smooth => 60 fps.
Smoothness is 0.1 and 1. You started to prove. Write view. You're defending. I can't find no adequate video.
Aloska wrote:
purely for the professionals who terebonkayut at the numbers.
And Your FPS is not terbongkar at the numbers or load of the video card? CPU? What it was about. This is a professional evaluation of the performance of the processor.
Aloska wrote:
You that the marketer of the Intel?
It is here with. This performance comparison the performance of the processor. It effectively works in games. Prove to me that effectively 7100 CPU for gaming. Show me those numbers. I see microfreeze when you download percent 100%.
Aloska wrote:
Well according to your link, there YOU are humiliated, and showed that 0.1 and 1%
Read on. The kid understood and appreciated the importance.
Aloska wrote:
saw a 0.1 fps on their system less than 9900k 20 shots and immediately ran for the percent at 600$?
There's enough 8700k / 9700k. You have merged with microprism already.

Or throws VIDOS confirming the efficiency of the processor - SMOOTH 1 / 0.1 and the time frame or merge already. I said the percents does not pull the game and friezes seen on video. I'm tired. The picture may not be smooth at percents under 100% loaded (most of the time).