Why did you start to play games, not with the first parts?
I always try to start playing with the first parts that would be nothing interesting to watch... the First mafia, the first max Payne games are just masterpieces. I even think that many in the asasina did not start with the first part, although the first asasin well conveyed the spirit of the time and was immersed in the game.For example recently I wanted to re-pass the first 2 parts Prince of Persia, but no resolution of 1080p. As it is not a boner immediately. To put it should be some kind of app be download. Broke. Has not started.
I love old games, we can at least distinguish where the good graphics where bad, but right now all games look the same, fashionable and boring open world. Yes you do but rail rich game, something she was all that interesting. And I'm not immersed in the modern game, the graphics is good but not believable, it was better before)
The reasons may be different from the physical impossibility to the banal spoiled. Sometimes comes to the absurd. The so-called fans of the third of the Witcher don't want to play the second part, because there graphene shit.
It happens that the first (or second) part of the series appeared on a particular platform. For Example, Devil May Cry. Or Fable series, where the second part was released only on Hboks, while the first and the third is on the PC. Approach vile and completely unfounded.
Some series start at the source only being a notorious fan. Type Final Fantasy or something. How many games in the series? 30 pieces? And the passage of all this business will take several thousand hours.
Other series, without a difference where to start. This applies to all shooters of the type of cold, battles, medals, doom, quake and Wolfenstein.
I, for one, only play the second Diablo. The first part is awesome, the atmosphere gotacha, but personally I don't like the simple fact that the character can't run. The third part of Diablo in General is not relevant.
Oh, I minusanul, because I understand how much a good missed not playing in the first part) Yeah the reasons are for which it is not possible to play in the first part, but to see how it all began well this is interesting. I usually start with the first comes first goes next...) Normal, the dialogue in the Witcher 2, especially the fights where cool, but not very atmospheric as the Witcher 3.
Usually I also try a series of games to go with the first parts. But it happens that others start. Sometimes the old part scrapped to pass due to their old age, sometimes the first game can akasada uninteresting, but basically start with the first part due to materpeice. Here is wanted with for example the fifth part is to start, and the first 4 to be scrapped) so
The first Witcher is not so very different from the third, as the first Finalka from the latter. Or arena from Skyrim. And Max the first from the second differs only in the regeneration of sameplace face GG.
The main problem of the first games of the old series is our monitors. To play in the box 1\8 the area of the screen, trying to read pixels typed a huge text adventure.And so, if you can deploy half of the screen, you can play why not.
Why did you start to play games, not with the first parts?
Depends on the game. The first part of HoMM, the first part of Doom, for example... the second part surpass them in all respects. For all ;]
Sanchez Ramirez wrote:
Other series, without a difference where to start. This applies to all shooters of the type of cold, battles, medals, doom, quake and Wolfenstein.
Some heresy 8)
Compare the first two to three cold with MW? There is action in World war II, and then in a modern setting. The first and second Quake: Gothic style+magic of the first part and the setting of the second part, completely different games.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Compare the first two to three cold with MW? There is action in World war II, and then in a modern setting. The first and second Quake: Gothic style+magic of the first part and the setting of the second part, completely different games.
The fact of the matter is that the setting is different. Starting cold with Modern Warfare you don't feel a loss from not passed the first three parts. The story they are not related in any way, so they can be conventionally considered as different games.
In GTA series I, for example, the first was Vice city. Then San Andreas. After playing in SA, I decided to try the 3rd part and was disappointed. Back in SA. And loss no did not happen, because the games of series GTA story not related (though there are mentions of the characters/events).
While starting to play the Witcher 3 is just nothing to understand. Who are these people? What do you want to do?
Or if you start Fallout new Vegas it is also possible not to grasp what NCR is and where it came from. Explanation in the game would be enough, but for those who played part 1 and 2 it will be clear that the capital of the NKR itself, they have visited more than once.
The battles at all interesting happens: part 4 was about modern war, after it was Battlefield I of the First World, and here comes the new part 5 and the action is happening already in WWII.
Katanar wrote:
Why did you start to play games, not with the first parts?
A few minutes tried to remember at least one game on PC that did not start with the first part... didn't remember. Even the breakout played the first PC version :D I Wonder how other people who started to play from the first half of the ' 80s?
Katanar Why did you start to play games, not with the first parts?
Because often the other parts are very different from the first and sometimes even much change the whole concept of the game, or, on the contrary, they are the same but just better because it came later.
So what for to play first?
for example the GTA games are divided into three periods, the first part is different from the 4 as the heaven and earth.
Or, for example, edge lights 1 and 3 are different games from different studios.
Or, for example, the first counter is outdated and stupid why do it if you have a GO ?
Well, now I have this quirk to begin with the first parts. I watch movies with the first parts. You know what the first part is bad, these tend to pass, that the soul does not lie and all. As with GTA 3 then I advised her strongly, but I could not play it, looked too dull unpleasant. I just for the fact that all of a sudden like the first part, and started on the other and a lot of good missed. Well, if you don't like, then don't force yourself) And if the plot related parts, then I think we should play, if you have the game. And somehow the graphics in KSS is more like it than go, nice looking. Something I was disappointed in this modern, glamorous graphics, this so-called photorealism not all of it... I have to make better games, new technologies, etc., but for some reason there is a degrade... Well, what the game may surprise you, many games are similar and monotonous.
It was similar with the Mass Effect series.
I remember I downloaded the second part and dropped to 1-2 mission. About the first thought, as the old in between (ME and ME2) is a big difference.
Don't remember why I downloaded ME3, but the game came;I came second (I know: I liked more the third), and then the first.
All just out-of-date Griffonia is, in my opinion, the main reason.Although there are exceptions,such asYES,the graphics in this game is not very good, to put it mildly,but gameplay is perfect and is a pleasure to play to this day,as for me.
I'm an old gamer and love pogamat in retro.Associated with it much that was in the past. A series I started playing back in the 90s. But for the current generation, I would not advise to play the first Might & Magic or TES. It's deadly scary.
now would be ten with the first part to begin to learn that nothing is missed or GTA peck-peck
The author and you series Wolfenstein began to play with the first part? And after she missed the second part?
Castle Wolfenstein (1981)(Muse)-2.png)
Beyond Castle Wolfenstein (1984)
Duke Nukem 3D. The third part in the series, the first two were platformers ?
We missed something not having played the first two? No )
Sanchez Ramirez wrote:
Starting cold with Modern Warfare you don't feel a loss from not passed the first three parts.
Loss? Loss in the fact that you have not played in the first three parts, and that's all ;] it would Seem that nonsense, but that's subjective. For example, I was interesting parts 1-3 and 5, the rest is not the same.
Sanchez Ramirez wrote:
The story they are not related in any way, so they can be conventionally considered as different games.
Here I agree.
Sanchez Ramirez wrote:
In GTA series I, for example, the first was Vice city. Then San Andreas
My first was... the first GTA =] Then the second. Then once San.
Sanchez Ramirez wrote:
After playing in SA, I decided to try the 3rd part and was disappointed. Back in SA.
The same thing happened to me, only instead of just third was Weiss. The difference was noticeable, San best of series GTA 3.
Tiger Goose wrote:
And after she missed the second part?
Oh, my goodness, what is that... 8)
And shooter Wolfenstein 3D is the third means. And RtCW fourth?
A. Soldier of Light
And shooter Wolfenstein 3D is the third means. And RtCW fourth?
Yes, that's right.
Am I somehow not so expressed? I play not only in the first part... I play in the series, but only if this whole topic will be of interest. And the game should more or less look like cartoons also do not like. What good is steep but if it is not catchy, I'm talking about modern games discuss. Can I be considered old-fashioned, but I still think that the max Payne and half-life 2 with nice graphics) do Not know where to developed drive, some games at 70-100 GB, although they are nothing special no. I think even the most powerful game is over 30 GB and not necessary, just the developers no longer know how to surprise, and little system wind, in the end, anyone here. Sadly all this is now the main thing in the game was the graphics, but even he can't bring to mind, how many games are not optimized brakes.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Loss in the fact that you have not played in the first three parts
Well, Yes. I myself am on the PS2 all three parts are passed. As for me, the series actually had to wrap up after the third (fifth, too, normas). Still, the game is about WWII, and a series about the present-the future was worth to make a separate game. But since the game has made a name for himself, now did not hesitate and MMORPGs release with the magic letters Call of Duty in the title...
