FPS problem (The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt)

I play comfortably with 640gt 22-30fps, ultra texturki 1080HD, highworks shadows drawing bottom

ElevenXI
The only option is to install the version of the game with patch 1.04, there will be no chest and dlc will not play, but the fps will definitely be higher!

Someone Like-You
Here, here .. The same thing, only without the haworks, on HD6950, textures at ultra, fps 25-30 (rarely drops to 15) and everything is comfortable. Of course, I would not refuse to play at fps 40-60, but for the sake of this I will never spoil the picture (somehow I'll just get together to buy a fresh vidyuhi ...)

ARONDIT
I set everything high, FPS doesn't drop at all, it's so stable 17-18 =)

X_ray_83
And what is the benefit? Toussaint will be released soon, and I'm with patch 1.04? I understand that FPS is important, but as they said above,
Stribogg wrote: and the Witcher is not an online shooter,
but 30 stable FPS with a head would be enough. I'll try to remove the grass.

Someone Like-You
Throw off a full set of configurations, if not difficult

ElevenXI
If you change the video card, then the power supply unit will have to be changed anyway. And if the matter is in the power supply unit, then you will get by with a little blood of 3-3.5k wooden ones.

I have a GTX 650 for 1 gig of video memory, a core i3-3220 3.30 GHz processor, overclocking the video card quite a bit, I got 26-30 fps, with high quality textures, low shadows, low vegetation rendering, medium relief and some post-processing function. Try
Spoilerhttps: //pp.vk.me/c629426/v629426654/558cc/yVCcG9i9Y38.jpg

JohnFender
Overclocking is pretty dangerous. It's better not to indulge in such garbage, but you can overclock a little

ElevenXI

Stribogg
Office vidyuhu I also need to change, buy a line 1100 or wait still, with my office ddr 3 1gb and 128bit which is worse than gtS 450, and hd 6670

Stribogg
No, this is not really the point. I remember those times, but you probably remember when we were all sitting on the 4: 3 format. That's how new full HD began to appear, I immediately bought it, and even instantly after several advertisements on YouTube! Painfully I liked it, and the size of the diagonal is much larger. No one could understand why such a huge monitor compared to 15-17d. As for 4k, these monitors have been released for a long time and not many have. I'm not talking about them at all. I mean, REAL vidyuhi would come out faster, which through, for example, dsr will pull 4k resolutions at 60 fps. As now they pull perfectly powerful vidyahi 60 fps at full HD 1920 by 1080. This resolution, well, really is very old and buying all sorts of 1070-1080 for this is breeeeeeed, and huge resolutions are not a fact that these vidyahi will pull well. In short, we'll see and in order not to go nuts, I will continue to wait for the green dragon - the imperial two-tiered Volta. Indeed, this permission has long since started to go away. Wherever possible I bet 2880 to 1620. In rare cases, 2560 to 1440

Igorek89
Don't talk nonsense!
First you need to know what influences what, and then spread your speculations here!
The bus affects the bandwidth aka speed, i.e. two cards with the same basic parameters, but with a different bus will work absolutely differently!
And the more incomparable are the cards that differ in memory by two times!

FinistEG
It is not necessary for you to carry nonsense, where I compared incomparable cards ???
GTX 560
GPU frequency 810 MHz
Shader frequency 1620 MHz
Video memory size 1024 MB
Video memory type GDDR5 Video memory
frequency 4008 MHz
Video memory bus width 256 bit
RAMDAC frequency 400 MHz
GTX 650
GPU frequency 1071 MHz
Video memory size 1024 MB Video memory
type GDDR5 Video memory
frequency 5000 MHz
Bit width video memory bus 128 bit
RAMDAC frequency 400 MHz
Where are they incomparable ??? The memory is two times the same. The frequencies are 20 percent higher at 650. Hmm. Wait, your favorite numbers are different with the width of the memory bus ... You can guess that the 560th in the Witcher has fewer frames than the 650th ??? Just at the expense of those 20% of the fundamental frequencies. And where, then, is the advantage of the 256-bit bus ??? A??
Your comment
FinistEG wrote:
It's all about the video, and more specifically, the bus, which is only 128-bit. It is urgent to change;)
Only confuses people, who will then frantically search for a new vidyuhu with a 128-bit bus, overpaying extra money just for these numbers. Modern AMD and Nvidias, even with such a tire, easily digest the witcher.

Igorek89
"Only confuses people who will then frantically search for a new vidyuhu"
On the contrary, if the bus is more than 256, then it means a powerful graph chip, which seems to be hinting. 128 has always been trimmed and new cards are no exception.

From 256 game card, less than average, and less than 128 office

X_ray_83
Someone Like-You
Well then, do not be lazy, please answer, where is the advantage of GTX 560 vs GTX 650 256th bus ???

X_ray_83 wrote:
On the contrary, if the bus is more than 256, then it means a powerful graph chip, which seems to be hinting. 128 has always been trimmed and new cards are no exception.
That is, in your opinion, it turns out that the GTX 560 is a serious gaming video card (although it was not even such at the time of its release) ??? Or what if you put a 512-bit bus on the 960th bus, something will change radically ???
Well, duck, no one can argue that the larger the numbers, the better, but after all, they are also more expensive ... than he says to professionals, the technical process, the number of universal processors, the number of texture units and frequencies play a much larger role. The test clearly shows that if you want to comfortably play the Witcher in FHD and you just want zhifors, then 128bit bus will be enough.

Igorek89
on such tests there is nothing to say, and yes, it depends not only on bits

Igorek89
There the old patch is now 1.12, 7950 makes 960 so that the shot goes nowhere)))

And then there are not ultra what 40fps, 7950 = 280 tears this piece of squalor 960 in all new games so the bus decides at 10fps.

Igorek89
In the Witcher 560 more fps gives 2 gigabytes such was the version. 650 even at low fps bottoms.
"although such it was not even at the time of its release) ???"
At that time, I had 6950 which, by means of the BIOS, I turned 6970, and this is the level of 570 and higher. I choose maximum performance for little money, this is definitely not Nvidia.