Lowered Springs - Toyota Caldina, 1.8 L, 2004
The springs RS * R ti2000 were purchased and delivered :
- the weight of the set is 7.8 kg (the manufacturer claims it is 30% lighter than the drain)
- the length is 265mm (the stock is 241 - the back is about 300 mm, in front of about 330mm)
put the springs rs * r. the machine crouched down by 30-35 mm.
from changing the springs, the following results:
- I had to raise the siduha - sit unusually low)
- it's clear about a more squeezed suspension - it goes into turns much better, even I would say understeer changed to neutral), but it may seem
- the most advantage is that, that the suspension began to better handle small asphalt irregularities (joints, small pits, etc.), the progressive characteristic of the springs from rs * r affects, i.e. at the beginning of the turn they are softer, then harder. Interestingly, the stock springs on the front are about 330mm long! against 265mm for the ti2000 , and the underestimation is only about 30mm, i.e. the drain is very tightly compressed in the rack, rs * r when I put it I didn't even need screeds)
- "speed bumps" are passed harshly
- the appearance is certainly better
- until nowhere touched)
Price tag: 6,000 ₽ Mileage: 73,000 km
I have springs frode from the gt-handicap (turbo calda), there are others ... although they approached and the clearance became not so critical ... between the arch and the wheel, 2-3 cm, it was 5-6, the car fell 3-4 cm
Hear =) I bought myself the same and from 241 Kaldins ... in my onboard!
Didn't know they were easier! For some reason I have a height of 285 in front and back ... but the models are different (I looked at the ebay)
generally advise to modify the rack for this case! Shorten the stem for example!
You took the boo ?!
runoff 165, dropped by 3-4, about 125cm is
normal, until I hit the
only negative - the car began to "goat" on the track, more precisely, it became jumpy, it does not seem to kill the racks, because no swing