Number value) - Toyota Sprinter Trueno, 1.6 liter, 1998

Exactly, just as it is) ) ) even about the technical passport to the point, I have less strength written there than it is)

hehe)))) I have the same)

Really suitable) ) )
The number of your car: 5
Very lively and quirky car. Unreasonable rebuilding is about her. The second one will never leave the intersection, but it will never slip through the red either. Despite the capricious nature, the car gets along easily with other road users and very rarely gets into an accident.

The routine is alien to the person inside this machine. Everything boils in his hands, he is swift in everything, thinks quickly, draws conclusions, works. The ability to express his thoughts is of great importance to him. He is overwhelmed with a thirst for knowledge, critical, resourceful, but quickly becomes discouraged by failures. Loved and popular, but not very economic, but curious and charming.

But I got a complete garbage about the second car) nothing in common)

Misha, I have the same xD

Cool, there is something in this, and I and my friend!

I have one to one, number 5, thanks for the link, I got everyone at work and they got me already!

I also have number one

Yes, but I don't really like "accident prone". But I don't pay attention to it.

Suits you?))

Number of my car: 9
A very impulsive car that is ready to conquer the road. He does not accept objections: if she is rebuilding, she must be let through, she is driving, the traffic light does not matter. Always the first to leave the intersection. Tends to get into accidents.

The driver of such a car has courage and willpower and, thanks to these qualities, achieves success. Often he weighs his forces incorrectly and does not distribute them rationally. In love and partnership, problems often arise - the result of exorbitant pride. He has good organizational skills and categorically cannot stand a subordinate position.

=)) the main thing is that you are inclined not to let the car get into an accident))

I come from the first post *)))

That's what I think)

I don’t even know *))) depending on which side to approach *)

Is it good or bad?)

hmm, I coincided with the author)