What is the best fuel for my car! - Toyota Corolla, 1.6L, 2008
At the end of November, in our region, at Rosneft gas stations, fuel appeared with the inscription 95 SUPER, asked at the gas station, explained: fuel from Germany, Rosneft signed a contract for a year, supposedly to study demand in Russia ...
I decided to refuel: 1 l-30 rubles, filled the tank - rolled it out, poured it a second time and the difference is palpable: the engine works almost noiselessly, when it is warmed up, the tachometer needle stands exactly, does not float (as it was sometimes noticed before), the dynamics are better, the consumption is less ... do we really have such high-quality fuel as abroad ... Write who has heard what, who has what thoughts ... Thank you all in advance!
Utu conspiracy, why produce high-quality fuel, spend money, if you can hang out the nameplate, that it is cool and raise the price? people won't buy such things on Zhiguli, but on foreign cars, everything is exactly right ...
Is there really no high-quality fuel in the capital, where there are so many people and consumers?
I was flooded with 98m (ordinary and ecto) ... and 95m with ordinary and super and ecto ... everything is monotonous, I didn't even feel any sense from the 98th ... 99% that this is a scam for money ... I won't say about Kalik, Europe is closer to you ...
ash stump, what is possible) just in 2 magazines came across that the best effect on Zhiguli and the like after flooding 2-3 tanks (especially if the car skated a couple of seasons) ... I don't know what to believe, but I won't lie ...
AeroSmith
95th and preferably not singed. This is optimal.
As for the fuel from Germany, there is a suspicion that the differences lie not only and not so much in the octane number, but in other impurities that affect the engine operation "in the long term", and not sesecond.
yes, it is for the future ... they also recommend this kind of casting when the car left more than 50 thousand, such as for cleaning)
95th and preferably not singed. This is optimal.
As for the fuel from Germany, there is a suspicion that the differences lie not only and not so much in the octane number, but in other impurities that affect the engine operation "in the long term", and not sesecond.
In our country, they carry wonderful gasoline with multifunctional additives, produced by JSC Mazeikiu nafta. Previously, it was called the Ventus 95, and now it is like the 95 Premium. As far as I understand, the name did not affect the supplier. In general, this Baltic gasoline is good, I and all my friends refuel with it, compared to 95 conventional (at the same gas station), the fuel economy reaches one liter (when recalculating the average consumption), while the Premium is only 8 cents more expensive; - ). A car on such a fuel flies like an urogan, and I noticed that the smell of exhaust from the combustion of Premium 95 is much nicer than from the usual 95. So my choice is Premium (or Super or +) 95 gasoline!
If anyone wants, you can read what an improved grade of gasoline and its advantages are at the link:
www.ovis.ua/petrol/95-ventus.html (Actually, I think for all types of Premium or Super, regardless of the manufacturer).
And the usual 95 is how much you have. IMHO the price is too big. Is the game worth the candle?
In St. Petersburg, there were 95 and 92, and 92 turned out to be better. Consumption has not increased, if the dynamics have worsened, then imperceptibly. The price today is 17.6. The resource is an interesting question. But I don't think there will be a significant improvement, and anyway the car will be sold by that time.
My candles left more than 35 thousand km before replacement (more - since the previous owner changed them), due to the blackening of the insulator - that is, simply from old age. I drive 92, but only refuel at proven gas stations of the same brand.
In principle, normal. RUB 7 difference - h.z. I think this is an offer for owners of cars with high-tech engines. Although it was probably more correct to offer the European 98.
I've been pouring 92 right now on Lukoil, I didn't find any differences with 95. Since in Yekaterinburg there is no such super gasoline. There is a truth 98. Once he poured it, so the car flew like a rocket ... one day ... the next day, like a normal 92. We have 95 and 98 these are the same 92 currents with a huge amount of additives, which overnight, for two, settle and normally ride a regular 92. So don't worry about 92 steers.
I drove 92 all the time, but recently dropping into a gas station 92 merged and refueled 95, the car just flew. but the next day it became the same as before, but after each refueling it flies, the conclusion: fill in a little and more often))
I fill 95 usually on Cheetah, Clo, on the highway, if I still refuel on SHELL, WOG, OKKO. At these gas stations, gasoline is very good. If there is a premium (Cheetah) I try to fill it up and not 95 normal. I don't refuel at Lukoil because we have worse gasoline there. The difference is palpable with the above-listed gas stations.
I always drive 92 and have heard more than once that 92 is better in quality than 95, and Bo 95 is the same 92 only with a bunch of additives that are not very useful for the engine ...
somehow at a gas station I met a guy on a Honda Torneo (2.0 / 150 hp ) and he poured 95, I asked if there was a difference, the flow-dynamics, and of course he said that 95 is decently better ...
after which I counted for money and for efficiency And concluded: that for the money it turns out, efficiency I will buy a liter or two with the same money for a couple of liters of 92 and if nothing changes (nothing is better from 95) then why overpay ?!
this is my conclusion, everyone does it differently.
after which he subtracted the testing of additives in gasoline that remove those errors of Russian gasoline and began to pour castrol TBE :)
(not advertising :) :) :) ...)
and who refueling at TNK gasoline - plus 95 they have appeared - is it better than 95 and is it worth pouring it into a new car?
I took it on their website (not advertising "!)
On October 1, 2009 at TNK filling stations in Moscow and the Moscow Region, sales of new TNK Pulsar gasoline with an octane rating of 95 started. TNK Pulsar complies with the Euro-4 environmental standard and significantly exceeds the standards of the Russian Federation GOST Ð 51866. TNK Pulsar 95 gasoline, in comparison with the standard A95 gasoline presented in the Moscow region, reduces the amount of deposits on the intake valves by up to 34 times, reduces the level of carburetor fouling by an average of 11%, and has 2.4 times less corrosive activity. properties of TNK Pulsar are significantly higher than that of standard gasoline TNK Pulsar prevents the formation of up to 90% of deposits in the engine and removes up to 60% of existing deposits.More about TNK Pulsar you can find out on the websitewww.tnkpulsar.ru .
I think yes, I will refuel it right now and I will definitely unsubscribe, right now, half a tank of 95 with TNK (I refuel Toko at TNK using the Magistral card)
For bringing fuel from Germany, the price, in theory, should skyrocket by 10 rubles per liter. And considering that in Germany gasoline costs 1.49 euros (about 55 rubles), in my opinion, the price per liter cannot cost about 27-30 rubles per liter! Although the fuel can actually be better than normal. But at the expense of what it is necessary to recognize.
I would like to leave my feedback on the fuel of these guys - partner-neft.ru/ .
At first I was extremely skeptical, well, as is always the case with unfamiliar companies. I tried to order once, twice - everything is perfect. There are not very many companies in Russia that I really respect. This is one of them.
The best fuel is 115, called methane. And clean and environmentally friendly and cheap. And the consumption falls by 10-15% with it. Recommend! You can read in more detail in my BZ.