All RuneWords (Rune Words) in one file (Diablo 2)
I would like to find all RuneWords (Rune Words) in one file ...There are a couple of files, but as it turned out, they do not contain complete information.
Somewhere I took a prog called Talifer`s Rune Wizard (www.talifer.co.uk/RuneWizard/) - Diablo fans, I recommend.
In it, everything is fine, everything is as you want, but I have it for a pretty old version (it is not known which one, but definitely not the last one), and the link from the official site to download it is pretty taporn ... they ask for money, registration, etc. etc., if anyone has version 1.1.3 (the latest at the moment) post it, please.
Well, or just in a file, like: PDF or CHM or .... well, in general, do not care in what format, the main thing is that ALL runwords from 1.11,1.10 and below are in one file (you can see all of them here - classic.battle.net/ diablo2exp / items / runewords.shtml? rhtml = y there are three links at the bottom) for some reason they are not saved in the pdf, although as written, there is such a possibility.
You don’t ask Blizzard for the Diablo source. Afraid - do not download. That's your business.
We do not download, but buy licensed discs in specialized stores. In the event that we would have suffered damage from these discs, we could always contact support or more serious authorities.
malloc
Puzznic
hangover Posona
, with which now all progressive youth are unpretentious programs with count. interface writes? VinAPI + C? Qt? Dotnet? And then in our "classical university" we were taught only to multiply matrices and save the results to a file. Recommend what is good to know.
"By the way, I don't play d2 because I'm afraid of viruses. :(".
Obsessed, and here Diablo2 and viruses. You made me laugh. Well done)
Episcop_moo, if I taught pascal at the university, then I advise delphi7 (I personally love it), a fairly functional compiler, although many scold it. In general, I look at who is perverted on what. As for the purchase of licensed programs: I can sell it to you along with the source code and we will draw up a contract, the fact is that you will not buy it. Personally, I understand a little about the ways of implementing viruses and even wrote worms and Trojans (for self-education purposes, all my viruses were destroyed by me personally, only the source code remained) and I do not feel phobias towards viruses. I am sure that viruses live on a par with antivirus on many PCs, and you don't even know about them. This is from experience, Casper does not see my worms and spies even now. But it makes no sense to infect someone on purpose. Antivir may complain about compressing the file with ASPack, it has shrunk more than twice.
if I taught pascal at the university
, it means that our university is not yet so "classic" - there were pluses, C sharp, java, pkhp, came into contact with Haskell (so as not to relax, apparently). Thank you guys, I am superficially familiar with vinAPI and kuts, I’m digging around, perhaps, with them and with gtk, I often hear about this thing.
I can sell it to you along with the source and we will draw up a contract, the fact is that you will not buy it.
Truly so, and, to tell the truth, I also did not buy q2. But I like to write here that you need to play from licensed discs, because of this some comrades have bombs, and this is pleasant for me, although I myself only use miserable copies from original discs shot from a classmate three hundred years ago, who has not played anywhere for a long time, probably ...
Episcop_moo, and I, for the last time, when this was required, downloaded from torrents. ashamed. very ashamed. but I was able to. ; D
Firk's hangover is clearly a troll in this situation.
I don’t troll, I do it myself, so I advise
all the gui for Windows that I did for Windows was made on c + winapi (very old about 8-9 years ago, foolishly wrote with elements of C ++)
one gui prog for Linux which wrote half a month ago - the same si but this time with Xlib
and you can also si + winapi + wine for Unixes, also an option if you are too lazy to redo the old
firkax
I do not troll, I do it myself and I advise
Well, in this case I do not approve of this approach at all. For gui, unification is good, not crutches like wine or learning different (!) Api of different platforms. Instead, it is much more logical to use the frameworks that are made for this. First, to transfer your crafts to other platforms with minimal effort. Second, to use higher-level abstractions, thereby increasing not only the speed of writing, but also the quality of the final program.
malloc
is actually right.
Why is it right? You yourself advised c #, but now he, for some reason, is right.
here he recently made a state program with XLib + C
Iii?
I did not recommend a hangover , but simply said that progressive youth are using them to write simple programs with a graph. interface.
Episcop_moo
gtk + form slap if for ci, qt + form slap if for c ++. I advise qt more, tk. it has very good documentation.
The Boss is
not :)
malloc
progressive youth
winapi
What's progressive about it?
gtk + formblind, if for C, qt + formblind, if for C ++
Does not depend on the language. There are bindings for many.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_language_bindings_for_Qt_5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_language_bindings_for_GTK%2B
stupidly wrote with elements of C ++
And if it's not a secret, in what way is C ++ inferior to pure C that using the first is stupidity? I'm not asking for the sake of holivar, I'm just now "at a crossroads" and am very interested in the opinion of programmers.
QLinkee
Some new cheat? Interestingly ...
look at what Xlib is and it will become clear that this does not apply to q2,
but more specifically - it was an x ​​window manager sharpened strictly for my personal preferences, to replace gnome 2 (which is generally better than the other popular ones that I have seen, but itself has a number of drawbacks)
Episcop_moo
And if it's not a secret, in what way C ++ is so inferior to pure C
C ++ from C (except for object-orientedness) differs in less strictness in a number of aspects,
this less strictness leads to a greater temptation to cheat, in contrast to C, which customizes with its requirements
there was no talk here about writing high-quality code about OOP, this is a separate topic, but if you are interested in the OOP aspect, then with it like this:
1) OOP can be done in C, though not so "clearly" for noobs as in C ++
2) C-code in any form (including oop) is translated into machine codes in a very unambiguous and obvious way, that is, you you see a line of code in C and you can immediately tell what exactly the processor will do when it is executed, in C ++ there is generally no such thing, it is somewhat closer to scripting languages; all sorts of c # and java are generally scripting languages ​​in almost pure form, and not programming, although now it is customary to call them "high-level programming languages"