Compare Counter-Strike: Global Offensive vs Battlefield 3 (Counter-Strike: Global Offensive)
Which game is more interesting online in terms of different parameters Counter-Strike: Global Offensive or Battlefield 3. Here I compare two similar games.What is preferable to buy?
Personally, I prefer to buy Battlefield 3, as there are vehicles, different classes and destructible. It's my opinion.
But these games cannot be compared!
Brother_Norbert
Battlefield 4 is a newer game, for sure there is anti-cheating at a height and there are a lot of people. Whether the game itself is more interesting there, you can ask about it.
it seems to me that EA will soon score on BF 3, this is how it was with NFS World, so BF 4 or CS GO
Spoiler Better not to buy in Origin, they require a lot of donation
Wolf_UA1
Compared the NFS World F2P game and BF3 for which people paid money. The BF will work while they play it. Even BF BC2 works online in my opinion. Only there is a small online one.
Nikita237
you saw what they offer to games, in small pieces, especially to BF 3 and 4
BF: variety, destructibility, real battlefield feel, but terrible network code and no shooter mechanics.
CS: monotony, competitive game - skill required, 64 tick rate servers - good for casual, good shooter mechanics.
In general, if you have not played network shooters and you want real military mixes, then the battle will do. But for the sophisticated online warrior, it will be a torment.
Oh yes, there is nothing to do without a premium in bf, it's like having a castrated demo version.
Inshala
SpoilerAh yes, there is nothing to do without a premium in bf, it's like having a castrated demo version.
I'm afraid that I don't have time to achieve a premium, if I shoot 30 hours a month, I’ll hardly reach the premium in a year.
I need a game for relaxation, for drive, to shoot - to distract from worries. As I understand it, it's better to take Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, but there probably are ranks.
How do you like Warface compared to Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. I do not want to create a new topic, in fact, here I am trying to compare shooters with what can we say with a typical benchmark of Counter-Strike online shooting ranges.
SergeySZV
I would say Counter-Strike: Global Offensive floor of the tactical game, here it is necessary to use their brains and the response is very important + there is a lot of fun playing with the competitive games with friends, and so even when a new operation, new maps, a lot of good quests
and bf is like meat with a simple shooter technique, it cannot be compared with Counter-Strike it will be more correct to compare bf and code than bf and cs
PS My advice is to take Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
in the appendage, I can say that you can get an expensive gun or box, and you can sell it and expand your Steam library
Battlefield is unambiguous, everything is interesting there and you feel that there is a military action. And if you are ready to spend 400 hours shooting from the AK, then you can play Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. And the games are not expensive, you can buy both
But what about Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 with anti-cheat and attendance, with the gameplay? the last inexpensive from CALLa, by the way cheaper than battle.