3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
i
ilyush 12.11.21 07:36 pm

Game Impression (Battlefield 2042)

Sharing) Is it worth taking a full edition for 5 thousand? And is this really the same battle?
52 Comments
Sort by:
A
Arevac 12.11.21

ilyush
And where "full" for 5 thousand sell?

A
AndreyKOT3 17.11.21

Optimizon bullshit. As a game, it reminds me of those good times bf3 bf4 in which I spent days on end. But I bought not a game, but a subscription for a year of eaplay pro for 4000r, thereby gaining access to play for a year in the ultimate edition of bf2042

g
gloccc 17.11.21

ilyush
Such a pleasure for itself = that same battle is present only in portal mode (which is logical, because these are old cards from bfbk2, bf3 and bf1942 with the same rules), but there are very few cards - only 6 pieces + not all equipment and not all weapons are available. The only drawback of the portal is the decoration in the houses - in fact, these are just empty boxes without an interior, the same goes for the main cards. The Daians made the Khazard zones the main mode = the first five skating rinks are played more or less, but then it becomes boring (no killer of tarkov, divisions and hunt showdowns here is even close to pakhent). Standard mode is played like shit because of completely disgusting maps (they are gigantic, with a lot of open and empty space between the points) and a system of operators that does not fit the series at all = no dynamics, no teamwork. Plus, at the moment, the game without the patch of the first day (the press played the game with the patch of the first day and everyone says that the optimization was fixed, but bugs and problems with the netcode are still in the game), so now the optimization is so-so. Bottom line = the only good mode is the portal, but it's not worth giving 3,500 rubles for 6 cards, I advise you to wait for the start of the next year and buy at a discount (then the content will already be delivered, at least in the first season they will add three new cards for the portal - one for each parts)

H
Hctaw 17.11.21

Arevac
in ea with a subscription, if you have a subscription to ea or xbox game pass, but the game at the moment is not worth half of this money, everything is very bad, you have to wait for patches and the start of the first season after the new year

A
Arevac 17.11.21

Hctaw
First read what I asked the question.
In EA, a subscription costs 4k, not 5. The full edition costs 7k. So I want to know where the author found a full for 5k.

S
Shimuto 17.11.21

I played all night. The game is more annoying than delightful.
Smothers technology. There is too much of it. Where do not deploy there is a huge chance that within 2 seconds you will be killed by a tank or a helicopter. If you want to "shoot with a weapon" then a technique that in 8 out of 10 cases will not even allow you to reach the place of the shootout will be insanely annoying.
Choking a netcode? or server? Deaths behind the wall at a ping of 90-100. Receipt! You shoot at the enemy in the scope, hits are shown, blood comes from it. (HE HAS NO ARMOR) he kills you in killfeed, he has 100% hp.
Well, the balance itself is in shit. Operatives are useful once or twice. From gadgets, 90% of players run with extra. armor.

d
dimon9875 17.11.21

And where did the choice of the server go? There is a portal in the mode, and where are the others? Connects randomly then 30 ping, then 300

H
Hctaw 17.11.21

Arevac
I answered this question and answered if there is a standard ea subscription (for 300 rubles per month) or an xbox game pass subscription - the game is sold at a discount, full edition for 5k
pysy, you understand, you mean the ultimate, it costs 6300, but who is it will buy at all? full edition means game + season pass

A
Affekt77 17.11.21

Shimuto
I agree completely. I will add a little, in this battle the graphon seemed to me worse than in bf5, even at ultra settings in qhd soap soap, and nvidia filters in the game for some reason do not work, GPU is loaded by 80-85% and as a result of FPS drawdown from 165 up to 120, and sometimes even lower. In general, the game is still raw, if they add new modes, at least where there is only infantry without equipment, correct the optimization, then I'll think about buying, but 5.5k, IMHO, the game is not worth it anyway, take only the cheapest version for 3.5k or wait for discounts, but for now the refund of the game.

S
Slave_Zero 17.11.21

Yesterday was played more or less normally today errors on the error on the server does not start up.

K
KillMashine334 17.11.21

Everything is sad with the new Battle.
DICE are driving themselves into the grave by trying to take Batla to all sorts of canyards. Either their EA is constantly pressing there to attract a new audience, or they are not adequate to what they are doing. Most likely the first.

In any case, only the Portal is playable in the game. It is good, but this is the merit of the old parts and more shows the inability of the developers to make a normal new game, and not a remake of the old one. Yes, and this Portal is more like a handout, they say, close your eyes to what we are doing from Battle Cold.

The main game is an analogue of Varzon with specialists and empty cards. Capturing and breaking through on the same maps is not playable. This is understandable, because the entire main game was made for Hazardzon.

Already from the time of 3-4 parts I have been waiting for DICE to take their head and make just an analogue of these two masterpieces with normal maps, classes and modes. Looks like I can't wait.

S
Shimuto 17.11.21

Affekt77
Regarding the soap and graphics ... well, yes. You cannot turn off TAA. only modes (low) and (high) DLSS Quality somehow adds sharpness.
On ultras at 1440r fps from 70 to 130. depending on the card and the place on it. (config in profile). Prots eats like not in himself, which is not surprising from the multiplayer for 128 people.
As for the balance, I played a little more and I think that my main concerns about vehicles (or snipers) would be decided by the ability to exclude certain cards from the pool. I would remove the cards where, in my opinion, technique dominates and the cards where it is ideal to sit behind the snipers.

S
SpacePRedator014 17.11.21

From the beginning I wanted to write a ton of text with angry comments about this game, then I decided to try to describe everything in a few sentences. The game is a complete hack, even Portal turned out to be so-so due to the meager content. In Battlefield 2042, add to the scanty content the bastard system of specialists and equipment management, because of which no one runs with RPGs and MANPADS, which causes the technique to bend and add to this a mode like Tarkov, in which there is no depth, ran 5 -10 the rink and abandoned it, because the garbage is full and for this sake of excuse sh * vna, they just ditched the whole game, because here you can clearly see that the whole game was made for the sake of this shit Hazard is even there, and not for the sake of Battlefield, because there are maps made for it, specialists are made for it, but nothing has been done for Battlefield, even the shooting is miserable, you either pinch, why was it necessary to make 128 players, when you have maps like a whole country, where you will meet enemies only after 5 minutes of running, although stop, it is clear why, because in case you want to turn this Hazard Zone into a Royal, and there you need huge maps, but I I don't think that anyone will play this shit, most likely the regime will die in a month. Well, as always, you have to wait a year and a half until the game becomes normal, of course we'll see what happens with the patch on the 19th, but I don’t even know, the game is not worth 3500 rubles for sure, it’s not at all clear what 3 studios did with such meager content, probably they drank coffee and discussed how else to torment the fans of the series so that they would suffer from the fact that the Battlefield seems to be the same, but on the other hand, it's Call of Duty. it is clear why, because in case you want to turn this Hazard Zone into the Royal, and there you need huge maps, but I don't think that someone will play this shit, most likely the mode will die in a month. Well, as always, you have to wait a year and a half until the game becomes normal, of course we'll see what happens with the patch on the 19th, but I don’t even know, the game is not worth 3500 rubles for sure, it’s not at all clear what 3 studios did with such meager content, probably they drank coffee and discussed how else to torment the fans of the series so that they would suffer from the fact that the Battlefield seems to be the same, but on the other hand, it's Call of Duty. it is clear why, because in case you want to turn this Hazard Zone into the Royal, and there you need huge maps, but I don't think that someone will play this shit, most likely the mode will die in a month. Well, as always, you have to wait a year and a half until the game becomes normal, of course we'll see what happens with the patch on the 19th, but I don’t even know, the game is not worth 3500 rubles for sure, it’s not at all clear what 3 studios did with such meager content, probably they drank coffee and discussed how else to torment the fans of the series so that they would suffer from the fact that the Battlefield seems to be the same, but on the other hand, it's Call of Duty.

PS When Battlefield V came out I thought that the bottom had already been broken, but no, DICE managed to break through the next one, if then they ruined the game with a submission and service, now they ruined the game with orientation.

PS 2 And how disdainful is DICE's attitude towards ordinary players, after all, according to bloggers, they played the release version with the patch of the first day, but in early access we play some old version, that is, for 500 people, they rolled out the normal version, AND FOR ALL ITS AUDIENCE WHICH SPENT 3500-7000 RUBLES ON THE GAME RELEASED SOME BETA VERSION! Because this nonsense of what's going on in the technical part can not be described in any way, the netcode is shit, the optimization is shit, the graphics in the game are also so-so, even worse than Battlefield V, in my opinion sometimes, in any case, the same equipment or weapons are made clearly worse, in BC2 generally has some kind of bug due to which the weapon does not fire, IT SPITS BULLETS! For there is no way to describe the fact that when you shoot with the XM8,

PS 3 I wanted to write briefly, but it did not work out, but this hack in a couple of sentences simply cannot be described, and the magazine * x that gave the game above 5 points, you just need to put on a stake

H
Hctaw 17.11.21

SpacePRedator014
Current version and there is the first day patch version

A
AndreyKOT3 17.11.21

Hctaw
And where then the firewood from Nvidia?

V
Vanderville 17.11.21

In general, I rarely go to read the comments, not even to write something. But then there was a lot of bombs. The first game where on gtx1060 6 gb you feel like a sucker. Even at low fps up to 60 not always. comes. How is that? I played Kolda calmly on high, but here it is just as if they are being developed over you (taking into account the fact that now 1060 is the most widespread and is considered a national card) ... so maybe at least the skating rinks are fascinating? And here, too, a complete mess ... you feel like in a conditional Fortnite where complete game and chaos is going on ... there are almost no modes, there is almost nothing to choose from. A lot of bugs, no weapon balance. Even with a sniper, you cannot always kill from 1 time)) the only thing that pleases you did not buy this UG, but went by subscription. These creatures from Dice know very well what problems people have with video cards,

X
XOPSSS 17.11.21

Vanderville
In general, you are right about the game itself, but guys, let's face it - 1060 are already dinosaurs. Until last December, I also sat at 1060 6 .. but we all want the games to become more beautiful .. but here, alas, we have to sacrifice something. Kolda, yes, it goes briskly, but it also has a smaller scale

V
Vanderville 17.11.21

Well, all the games were pulled before in Full HD. Compare with the last part of Battle and you will be surprised what the difference is there is minimal. Moreover, this is the same multiplayer. Everyone who has played multiplayer modes at least once knows that the FPS is there and so will be lower compared to the single-player mode. And here they are simply strangled into the brazen. In such modes, the graphics are not the main thing and it turns out that players are not put on an equal footing from the very beginning with such requirements. Due to mining, prices have skyrocketed. For some reason, only Dice decided on this ... the rest of the companies are still perfectly aware that thereby they will lose in sales if they overestimate the requirements and strangle them in this way. + eerily disappointed in the whole game. I went to the metacritic and realized that their Battle was simply being destroyed there because of the same questions.

S
Spiny 24.11.21

Yes, I understand that either EA or Dice said that they were planning to make a new royal battle, but ... no, we must start from another moment, namely that the BF series was never a simulator and complete realism. BF is an arcade jester. However, remembering BF 1, the tanks are fleshy mud and physics was ... yes, the tanks in BF 1 are a little fast for their era, but BF is not a simulator. However, BF 2042 ... Code Warzon + BF = BF 2042. Physics has become even more arcade, reminds Code. In general, it seems like BF, but it has become completely arcade. I bought the ultimate and I will say that it is not worth the money. Maybe then they will introduce something quite a lot for such a price, but so far they have not beaten off in any way. There is no plot, there is only online. BF has always been online, and the plot was introduced only by BF: BK, and there is no point in buying BF for the sake of the plot alone. But there is no plot, or rather, there is a kind of story in the form of a video and that's it. Maybe then they will introduce the plot in the form of online, they seem to want to do it (but this is not certain), but it will become a completely different game. The plot (single player) is to sit and play quietly moving further and further. But online games are completely different, and I don’t know for sure how the story is presented online. GTA online? I don’t know exactly, we have to wait. I can judge the game so far by the gameplay how BF became Cold. Graphics seem to be normal, but my 2080 ti gave out at least 30+ fps, but mostly 40-50 + Ultra dlss quality settings + rays and it's all in 1920x1080. In any case, the optimization will be corrected, but I will not say that everything is terrible with it. It is necessary to wait for patches, additions (updates), etc., but now it is clearly not beating off its price. The plot (single player) is to sit and play quietly moving further and further. But online games are completely different, and I don’t know for sure how the story is presented online. GTA online? I don’t know exactly, we have to wait. I can judge the game so far by the gameplay how BF became Cold. Graphics seem to be normal, but my 2080 ti gave out at least 30+ fps, but mostly 40-50 + Ultra dlss quality settings + rays and it's all in 1920x1080. In any case, the optimization will be corrected, but I will not say that everything is terrible with it. It is necessary to wait for patches, additions (updates), etc., but now it is clearly not beating off its price. The plot (single player) is to sit and play quietly moving further and further. But online games are completely different, and I don’t know for sure how the story is presented online. GTA online? I don’t know exactly, we have to wait. I can judge the game so far by the gameplay how BF became Cold. Graphics seem to be normal, but my 2080 ti gave out at least 30+ fps, but mostly 40-50 + Ultra dlss quality settings + rays and it's all in 1920x1080. In any case, the optimization will be corrected, but I will not say that everything is terrible with it. It is necessary to wait for patches, additions (updates), etc., but now it is clearly not beating off its price. but mostly 40-50 + settings ultra dlss quality + rays and it's all in 1920x1080. In any case, the optimization will be corrected, but I will not say that everything is terrible with it. It is necessary to wait for patches, additions (updates), etc., but now it is clearly not beating off its price. but mostly 40-50 + settings ultra dlss quality + rays and it's all in 1920x1080. In any case, the optimization will be corrected, but I will not say that everything is terrible with it. It is necessary to wait for patches, additions (updates), etc., but now it is clearly not beating off its price.

b
bushmaster 24.11.21

Shimuto
, does the i7 9900k exist?