How many frames will my PC have? (The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt)
Monitor 1680 X 1050Processor intel core i5-2400
Video card GTX 960 2gb
Operative 8gb
Settings, disabled hair (of course) how much will be on ultra and how much will be on high. Do I have the ability to intelligently mix high / ultra and get 45 fps?
I think it will be quite good to work at medium-high, and maybe even at ultra you will wind it up, but with not the highest FPS)
you can, but it will sag in the city, but again, someone like me, the new patch 1.12 raised 10 fps, someone complains that the fps fell on the contrary, xs the patch went to my advantage, now I'm playing at the highest maximum, my processor is even worse than that of you, i5-650 10 gb of RAM and GTX-970 4 gb goes awesome just
Kazak3330
If you remove the mix of ultra and high in the hairworks settings, then it is quite possible and 60 fps, but with frequent drawdowns up to 45-40
Kazak3330
This is due to the fact that the game loads only a certain radius around the character, as soon as you switch to other coordinates, the vidyuha begins to put objects on this area and draw textures on them due to the sharp load such jumps. The same thing happened in the stalker, I did not know how to deal with it, then I found a parameter on the internet that is responsible for the full, or maybe not complete, but much larger load of the map, the levels were loaded longer, but without jumps in fps. If there is something like that for a witcher, then it's cool, I will be glad if someone knows something about this.
PS I play at an incredible quality, hairworks - everything is at the maximum, the game is stable at 65 fps, but there are drawdowns up to 50, due to furry creatures and loading the location.
serg pc, gtx 970, that's fine, but now it costs 26,000 rubles, gtx 960 can be bought for 16,000 rubles.
Shurundul, well, if the drawdown is up to 40 fps, then it's not scary, for the sake of the picture you can endure, if only not lower.
Although, tell us about the drawdowns, for you they go down to 50, you can feel it strongly, and do you think that the drawdowns up to 40 will be felt strongly?
If the game does not rest against the CPU, then it is quite easy to get a little scratching the graphics settings at medium / high 60 frames, because the 900 series copes well with modern games. So that there are no problems with loading the environment, I recommend putting the game on ssd.
Kazak3330
better copy for a new architecture in the spring top will come out, in the summer there will be some kind of gtx 1060
Kazak3330
Honestly, after gtx 660 those drawdowns that are now are complete garbage.
Look here, everything is set to ultra, your configuration (video + percent) do not forget that video recording eats about 10 fps
Apokalipsis113, yes I tested already on my 560, it seems there were no problems with loading.
The problem is all the same in the very grafoni and the number of frames. As a result, I put the game in a resolution of 1360 x then there is 860, I don’t remember exactly, I maxed out the increased clarity and set some parameters to medium, even a couple of high ones. As a result, an average of 35 fps can be played, but I am too careful with the Witcher's universe, I do not want to spoil my pleasure.
Boss_Timurchik, do you mean the whole system or the processor by architecture?
Kazak3330
At high, I think she will work as cute for you. I played on gtx 660, at high and did not feel any inconvenience, except for loading the location
Kazak3330
Better to really dig some money and buy something in the region of i5 and gtx 970-980, a much better option, it will come out in about 40k
Kazak3330
well, and the operative, if you have the opportunity to set yourself on timing, the lower, the better, and so that the frequency of the operative coincides with the frequency of the processor
And if you remove HairWorks with the same parameters, and put HairWorks AA in the middle, then how will it go?