Optimization (X Rebirth)
For me, at the moment there is no optimization as such in the game, it slows down even at the most minimal settings. We share our impressions and advice.Medved-spb
so far only the game interface is in Russian, localization will be added in parts
e850 8gb gtx 570 slows down at minimum, and this is nonsense!
Therefore, optimization is shit.
When X3 came out, in the early days it was also not an optimized piece of code, only then it was fixed with patches. I think in this case we have to wait.
mitroniks
Two cores for the last games are not enough for anyone, I have Arma3 only played on 4 cores, and battle4 generally uses all eight threads.
Two cores are not enough, the developers themselves said that the game needs 4 full-fledged physical cores.
mitroniks
Try to overclock the processor well, you look better.
Phenom x4 945, 8GB, HD6870
Even at the minimum it is terribly slow! The percentage is certainly weak, but not to the same extent! There is no difference between the max setting and the minimum setting. About 15 fps. It sometimes goes over 25, but rarely. I was already upset!
Yes, X3 was finished for a long time with patches, more or less optimized probably only after 2 months. So we are waiting.
From the Steam forum (how many
fps someone has), optimization where you are ... 4770k
780 dciioc
16gb ram
20-40fps unplayable at this point.
i7 920
GTX 570
6gb ram
20-40 fps = /
AMD FX-9370
AMD 7950 (Crossfire, but only 1 work: )
8gb ram
45fps max
5fps min
i7-4800MQ
GTX 780M 4GB
8GB RAM
20-60FPS - really depends on where I am in-game, what's in my FOV.
Same problem low fps (20-44) even without ssao, shadows off, aa off
Resolution 1080p
win 7 64
3770k
gtx 680
16 gb ram
Very poorly optimized game.
6 core i7-4930k
GTX 780 OC, 3 GB
32 GB ram
9-15 fps at the moment sitting in space, looking around. Changing graphics settings (resolution, aa, anything) doesn't change fps.
I can't express how disappointed I am. Why has it become so normal in the gaming industry to release non-working pieces of shit as a finished product?
the game crashed 4 times stupidly in the menu when changing settings
i5 2.6ggz latest generation, 8gb cortex, win 8 64 bit, amd hd 7870
Note: AMD A6 3400M - 4 cores at 1.4 GHz, 8 GB ram, AMD Radeon HD 6520G and discrete AMD Radeon HD 6650M (2 GB).
5-15 fps is just horror. I had a crisis, and here it is not possible to play, and the font is tin.
denic9
4770 / 16gb (1600) / gtx660-start of the company 25-30FPS, does not fall below 25, video settings to max (1680/1050)
GTX 660 is a cinder block. At the end of 2013, expecting good performance from the GTX 660 in new games isn't just silly ... it's weird
Mr. Freeman
I agree, I inserted it from an old computer. But the card is still worthy of attention (price / quality,) even now (I don’t contact AMD). I also suspect that the point here is not in the card, but more of the processor-operative part (my opinion)
above 60 fps, the graphics do not rise to the norms without any anti-aliasing, you should try at maximum speed for interest.
Set everything to maximum (8x anti-aliasing). The ship is about 55-60 fps. In space, it can be up to 100. In general, as anyone is lucky.
I turned on Rebirth after work in the evening, looked at it for 30 minutes and turned it off ... only ONE of TWO video cards is working ... it’s worn out ... that ARMA 3, that Total war ... what do the developers think when they don’t connect SLI support ?? Many have 2 vidyuhi each ...
fLaMaster
Do you want to say that when you start the company (when you first start flying) you have 55-60?
If so, then I don’t even know what to say (I have i5 2500k 4.5, 8 Gb 1666, gtx titan, 1920x1200)
PS I have no such fps at the start in space (on the ship itself inside 60), even at minimum