3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
A
Artorius 19.11.21 01:03 pm

Optimization (X Rebirth)

For me, at the moment there is no optimization as such in the game, it slows down even at the most minimal settings. We share our impressions and advice.
100 Comments
Sort by:
A
AVIORIK 19.11.21

I’m at least 30 and they are not enough and 60. From bought the game and what to do with it now?

A
Alexander Shmelev 19.11.21

0-15 fps and even then at the worst settings, monitor resolution 1920 x 1080, gtx 650 gig memory card? Processor Athlon II x4 645, 8 gigs of RAM, waiting for the game dick knows how much and break off ..... for what ?!

D
DG965SS 19.11.21

Nothing slows down) core duo E6300 HD68701gb .4gb rem. in Russian only tasks and menus, no voice acting or subtitles

D
DG965SS 19.11.21

Default settings.

Z
Zere 19.11.21

it seemed to me that the graphics settings do not affect the game process at all ... equally uncomfortable, although it does not slow down

u
unicorn290 19.11.21

there is no optimization, this is an observable fact

S
SNAKE_obanze 19.11.21

I have 56-60 fps (with vert sync, everything is at the maximum, 8-fold anti-aliasing), 45-48 fps in highways, 35-37 fps with subsidence in some places up to 28 at the station. This is the very beginning when we sit down to first base. I'm waiting for the translation, on principle! I don’t know how it will be with explosions in space, but in open space 50-60 fps, when approaching the base, it sank to 38.

GTX670 (two gigabytes), 8 gigs of RAM, i7 2600 (4 cores at 3.4 GHz).

f
fLaMaster 19.11.21

denic9
As if our configurations are almost the same. 2500k = 3570k, and titanium = 780. I tell you, apparently how lucky someone is.

S
SNAKE_obanze 19.11.21

Hmmm no, I was wrong! On approaching large bases and in the first shootout with two drones, normal brakes when spinning past asteroids, etc.! At the stations, not everything is smooth, although the textures there are just dirt! as in some strategies with the ability to zoom the camera from a third person (and not new)!

Conclusion: 3 out of 5 optimization! I apologize, but I have the last Call, the optimization of which a lot of people complained about and who had a GTX 760 with 4 gigs in the recommended ones, went to the ultra with all the bells and whistles! And then what ??? I don't see anything surprising in the picture! (to be honest about the details). It remains to believe in the patches that I hope will soon arrive along with the Russian language !!!

+ here honestly got enough of what in the recommended config they write, for example, a GTX 500 series with a gig (etc.), well, it seems like if you have 670, then it seems like you start to think calmly: OOOO well, I have more than normal stock! I understand that this is often written from the bulldozer! BUT NOT SO MUCH !!!! Previously, they also drove, but not like that! And now the fashion has gone straight! We must already be prosecuted for deception of this kind!)))))))))))))))))))))))

R
Regor 19.11.21

Yes, the optimization is just awful, in some places the fps drops to 20, and so on average 35 fps, and this despite the fact that the graphics are not transcendental and there should be no load on the processor.
Core i5 3470 3.6Ghz, AMD HD6870, 4GB

X
X_ray_83 19.11.21

Someone started on XP?

M
Mr. Freeman 19.11.21

X_ray_83
Why XP? I started it on Windows 3.1. Flies. yyy

f
fraps123 19.11.21

Mr.Freeman
I have gtx470 not complaining about gtx660 you say that it is not enough pf ..

M
Mr. Freeman 19.11.21

fraps123
GTX 470 ????? and you are not complaining ???? Nu Nu ... A
joke about self-deception ... A man is engaged in auto-training and condemns ... I will not fart .... I will not fart .... I will not fart ... and suddenly he suddenly publishes a deafening fart ... and continues to condemn ... It's not me! It's not me! It's not me!

and as an idea development! --- I have a GTX 470 ... I am not complaining ... I am not complaining ... I am not complaining ... and when brakes appear on the monitor .... I see 60 FPS .. ... I see 60 FPS ..... I see 60 FPS .....

v
vit0208 19.11.21

Mr. Freeman
actually gives 660 in battle 4 at ultra 1080p, resolution 100.35-60 + frames, and with the AMD process and expecting good performance from it for at least another year is quite adequate

Z
Zagres 19.11.21

..... I beg your pardon, brothers, I read your conversations here and realized that I don’t know one small detail ..... just don’t laugh too much .... fps - what kind of animal is this?

M
Mr. Freeman 19.11.21

vit0208
Baby, I disconnected one 680th in Battle 4 from SLI for a test and started to slow down on ultra when i7 3770k process !!! What is the percentage of amd? what 660? What are you whispering about ?? ... I'm shocked. How can one play adequately on amd stones and on cards below 680 ????? I don't understand PPC ...

M
Mr. Freeman 19.11.21

Zagres
FPS- frames per second. The number of frames per second that your video card produces. The more powerful the card, the more FPS in complex scenes it can give out. In addition, the final FPS also depend on the CPU (central processing unit). With a weak CPU and a powerful card, it will be crap ... and vice versa. A good build must be comprehensive so that the iron works as one organism and that there are no bottlenecks. For me personally, the comfort level is 60+ FPS. Even 50 is already annoying. Profile configuration see

Z
Zagres 19.11.21

Mr. Freeman
Thank you, brother. How to check FPS?

M
Mr. Freeman 19.11.21

Zagres
There is a program called Fraps. When you start the game, the current FPS will be shown in the upper corner of the monitor))))