Voting (Praetorians)

I think 3.

2)
The game is awesome, but it's a pity there are not enough cards yet, they promise to release the editor in the near future, so we are waiting.

.. game 10 points .. everything is super .. knights forward .. !!! 1

I haven't played yet, but the game itself has been taken by many praise, even very much, and the cards will be over time, it came out of the current

They did a good job, it's a pity there is no economy.

give 4)

2
thing +)

1) For a long time I wanted to see such a game.
As for the editor, I agree.

A game with a good idea, but infuriates 1) you cannot take the troops apart 2) you cannot bomb with a catapult without aiming at the enemy (in the fog of war)

3 into the housekeeper's account agree

Normal din. 2)

2
Here in nature you have to think with
your head Cool igruha, not molded according to the template

The toy is excellent, although in the end it seems monotonous.
And not everything is in order with the history of the authors. What are gladiators on the battlefield or praetorians in Egypt, and chariots as a superweapon are just humor. "Gladiator" was revised by the creators.
But nevertheless it passed with pleasure !!!

Giving her a million, but no pity (1)

1)
Briefly and clearly,
I just go nuts from the game 8)

I think 1, because I passed all 24 levels !!!

Between 2 and 3.
In my opinion, this is not the first time the RTC was cut to more advanced military operations, but not the worst. The main plus of the game is that everything is drawn beautifully, and it is not demanding on the car. There is nothing more to say, I even bow to 3.
The economy of the game is certainly not needed, but the role-playing aspect would not hurt, IMHO.

The game is super! But it is a pity that it is only military. It would have been economic, it would have had no prices !!!

What the hell are control points and how to build them up ???????

Hard 3 (Stronghold is better).