amd fx-9590 or intel core i7 3770?
Actually the essence of the question is reflected in the title.I wonder what percentage on average adds more to FPS in games.
Temperature and power consumption are irrelevant.
MunchkiN 616
I also heard that directx 12 will appear by the end of the year, which will unleash the potential of amd processors.
Is it worth it then to take it with such a prospect? And does it apply to radeon vidyuhi?
Giever57
dx12 should unload the processor bus a little and the processor itself is insignificant. and unlocking its potential depends on optimizing the offer for multithreading.
when this will happen is unknown. and for example xeon is almost 2.5-3 times more effective than amd stones in terms of nuclei - frequency. therefore, most likely never.
But the games are optimized for 6 threads, because in 8-core amd I have never seen a couple striving for 100% load.
Take amd! Now the video card is more important! I have a processor 6 years ago and everything is rushing!
The FX 9590 is essentially a fully overclocked 8xxx series and there is no point in comparing this processor with Intel, especially in games, everyone knows perfectly well, homeless people take amd, the rules are Intel guys.
It seems to me better to take intel. Especially considering that they have a small price difference. You can even take i5 from the latter. But if I needed to build a budget computer, I would choose amd, largely due to the fact that they have models with good built-in video and affordable prices.
I think you should not ask here, tk. everyone will vote in the direction of their processor, and most of the market, as you know, is occupied by Intel. Compare the performance of these processors in the games you are interested in (see the comparison on YouTube, or on special sites), or with specialists in this field and make a choice yourself.
W3aMisterWinner
"where the most overclocked calories from amd (9590) would overtake i7 even in stock"
In applications on one core ahahah)))
Giever57
Take 9590 because this is the top (3770 mammoth shit already), but you need to mess with cooling what's there, what is there.
MunchkiN 616
"seon is almost 2.5-3 times more efficient than amd"
And what does Xeon have to do with it, he doesn't buy Opteron?
If you are building a computer specifically for games, then definitely take Intel Core i7, because AMD processors show themselves well in video editing, converting, etc., and the i7, it seems to me, will not lag behind them. In any case, Intel is a proven company and it won't do bullshit. I advise taking only Intel, no matter how many cores AMD has, but Intel will always be in games.