Your Soul is at gunpoint
Your Soul is at gunpoint.Destruction of family values, taboos on nobility, consumerism, sex and violence instead of valor and love, the formation of the image of an ideal slave of the system - a "successful person". There are other pillars of degradation in modern society. Is there a universal cure for this?
1) The upbringing of children is built according to the scheme of stimulating infantile behavior among children, in other words, the process of the onset of social maturity is artificially delayed. This is done in order to utilize the energy of young people during the period of its greatest activity (from 15 to 25 years).
Show in full ..
The fact is that in all historical times the bulk of revolutionaries was precisely this category of the population. A young man has a peak of physical and intellectual activity by the age of 20, he is healthy, smart, hot, principled and uncompromising. Dangerous, isn't it? Suffice it to recall that Alexander the Great was only 20 years old when he began his "career", Prince Svyatoslav at the time of his death was no more than 30 years old, Ivan the Terrible took Kazan at 22. And in our time (especially in Europe) at this age young people are considered "adolescents." This is what the upbringing of social infantilism is designed for, to turn the maker of history into a healthy and safe fellow. And let the excess energy merge somewhere, well, for example, in promiscuous sexual relations, in alcohol, drugs or in street crime.
2) Raising girls and boys according to common standards. This is done not so much to instill masculinity in women, but to take it away from men.
3) Instilling an egocentric picture of the world. An egoist is a loner, well, how can you not quote Mayakovsky: "... one is nonsense, one is zero, one, even if very important, will not lift a simple five-rod log, especially a five-story house ...". Or "divide and conquer" as the ancient Romans said.
4) Formation of the image of a "successful" person. To test, this "successful" person is nothing more than an image of the ideal slave of the system. A tie, a jacket, a dizzying career, a great home, an expensive car, a vacation abroad, Irish whiskey. Great, huh? Here is a lucky man, but in reality he is an ideal serf-slave, because he depends, like a drug addict, on his things. Therefore, he will do everything to maintain the stability of the system, he will endure any humiliation on the way up the career ladder. He will hide all his childhood dreams so deeply inside himself that he will forget himself, turning into a humanoid creature, into a geek.
This includes other images of "successful" people. Here there is a "cool" hefty guy with a beer in a bar, and a "bitch" who changes men like gloves, and a feminized madam, and a gangster. In general, for every taste and color. Choose what you like. There is only an image of a defender, an image of a warrior, an image of a mother, an image of a poet, a scientist, etc. Some distorted substitutes for natural patterns of human behavior.
5) Sex and violence, instead of valor and love. It is no secret that sexual instincts are among the strongest. Accordingly, through the topic of "sex" one can influence a person in a certain way. Moreover, the sexual instincts, like any other instincts, constitute our dark, animal part of the personality, the unconscious of a lower order. These instincts are stimulated through mass media, advertising technologies, propaganda in scientific and fiction literature, computer games. Friedrich Nietzsche said: "Man is a rope fixed between the beast and the superman - a rope over an abyss." So, from a psychological point of view, "superman" is associated with the highest form of our unconscious, a region that acts as a source of creative, scientific, poetic inspiration, a source of heroic deeds. And the area of ​​the lower unconscious is connected precisely with the beast, with instincts, with violence, fear. Both the "superman" and the beast are integral parts of ourselves, only in some "superman" dominates over the "beast", while in others, vice versa. I will reveal one little secret, our masters are afraid of the development of a higher form of the unconscious in their slaves, because this part of our personality is divinely deep, uncontrollable and unpredictable. They rightly decided for themselves that the monster of animal violence associated with the reproductive instinct, with sex, is much less dangerous to the system than the source of divine inspiration. It is for this reason that the swindler from psychology S. Freud began to plant his theory. Freud was not worried about science, he was worried about "occultism" from the unconscious, he was worried about the manifestation of violent divine power. Rather, this worried his sponsors. For them, the example of how the seemingly forgotten image of a "blond beast" escaped from the higher unconscious of the German people and almost reshaped the entire world order. For them, "sex and violence" is safer.
6) Consumerism. This is exactly the weapon from their arsenal that "kills" several "birds with one stone" at once. What is the difference between consumerism and consumption. Consumption is conditioned by the natural necessity of the individual in the possession of this or that object. This is easily seen in the examples. Your jacket is torn / worn out, you go and buy a new one - this is consumption, but if you go and buy a jacket because it is branded / fashionable in color / texture or simply because you want to stand out in front of others - this is consumerism. In other words, consumerism is immoderate, not naturally conditioned consumption. Why is it so important for the existing system. Well, firstly, consumerism is the engine of their economic model, as it constantly spurs demand, which in turn stimulates producers to grow, and the electorate is pushing for new loans, without which the existing monetary and financial system will collapse. Secondly, consumerism is an excellent antidepressant that reduces the social tension in society, and most importantly, determines the range of permissible goals for the population. Thirdly, people are addicted to it, as to any "antidepressant", which means that it makes people dependent, weak and easily controllable. Fourthly, it again, albeit to a lesser extent, but blocks the higher unconscious. it makes people dependent, weak, and easily manageable. Fourthly, it again, albeit to a lesser extent, but blocks the higher unconscious. it makes people dependent, weak, and easily manageable. Fourthly, it again, albeit to a lesser extent, but blocks the higher unconscious.
7) My fatherland is all of humanity. A person is distinguished from a simple animal not only by the presence of a developed intellect, but also by the presence of culture. What is a fatherland, a nation? This is not only the fact of the consanguinity of the population, it is, first of all, the fact of the presence of a unifying and nurturing culture. National cultures have been created over millennia, they have absorbed the wisdom of their ancestors and created healthy viable forms. National culture raises a person, raises the level of his consciousness. When different cultures are mixed / destroyed, a person becomes oskotin in the literal sense of the word, turns into an “Americanâ€. Do not be confused by the real "progress" of the United States, this is the progress of the "cancer cell". History will kill the States, you can be sure that Babylon always dies, despite its alleged "progressiveness". Destroying national cultures
8) Taboo on nobility. Nobility is dangerous to their system, because it creates unpredictable and uncontrollable behavior in people. They are afraid of unclear motives, they are more comfortable when people are driven by greed, lust, dependence, vice.
9) Destruction of family values. This point partly overlaps with "sex and violence", but has its own specifics. Destruction of family values ​​contributes to both the destruction of national cultures and the atomization of society, stimulating selfishness and bestial behavior.
The most interesting thing is that there is one universal remedy for this misfortune - to remember and listen to your eternal self. Don't sell your ideals for green paper, never act against your inner voice, even if it seems rational. Intellect is the most important tool, but a lot cannot be explained by dry logic. A person has not only intelligence, but also emotions, feelings, intuition. A healthy person should have all four aspects developed. And only your soul is able to unite these contradictory and incompatible parts of your personalities. Do not sell it even on pain of death or poverty, living with a sold soul is very painful and meaningless. Because it is your soul that knows about your true purpose. Requests can be infinitely different, you can be scientists, artists, musicians, engineers, builders, peasants, warriors and many others, you can create and destroy, do not be afraid. The main thing is not to turn into geeks, faceless, living dead of a spiritually hating system, taking you away from yourself.
kramola.info
I would like to "hear" the author's personal thoughts on this topic, so to speak, without copy-paste. Do you have any ideas how to be, to live on?
Evil Spirit of Yambuya
Return to the roots, study and restore the traditions and customs of His People, including the true chronology, comrade Fedoseev.
If you are a Slovyanin, then I advise you to contact the CCC sites for info, there are already all the "recipes" spelled out and work.
Balda716 To return to the roots, to study and restore the traditions and customs of His People ...
As long as there is such a thing as a "state" ... it will not work to return to the roots (I mean this right now on a scale, not in terms of a single personality unit) ...
As I already said, here either to start everything from scratch, or miracles should happen.
The Evil Spirit of Yambuya
You think in a standard way, memorized, as they suggest, they say a person is a nonentity, a cog in the system.
And We have an ancient saying: "and there is one soldier in the field," the main thing is to do what he must, no matter what.
Balda716
Our ancestors (Slavs) were wise people and everyone did what he should and everyone knew well that "there is one warrior in the field" .... but nevertheless ... right now we have what we have, and not what should ... It's not that easy in this world.
The Evil Spirit of Yambuya
It is good that you understand and realize this, it is now a great rarity.
The text is extremely sad, I ate it, I mastered
one current, it’s interesting about what I once thought for a long time - this is why the age of all man’s maturity has increased.
most likely the matter lies in the prohibition of work for schoolchildren and the creation of schools as such. schools, however, existed before, but it was an elite environment for a narrow stratum of the population.
and while various social reforms were taking place, the following changed - let's call it slower - the vertical transfer of experience between people of different ages. it consisted in the practice of transferring skills and experience by different people for the pozones who came to work at the machine and then puff with adult men. of all this, sexual and role education is just as difficult. in modern conditions, being is arranged so that people of different ages get along in a rather isolated environment, communicate only with their own kind, from which their development in total inhibits. from here it turns out such lol that a person is considered an adult from 18 or even from 21 years. it was a very slow metamorphosis, going on for almost 200 years.
the rest is the fierce delirium of a wise scholar that is even too lazy to scandalize.
everything in civilization changes dynamically. here are family values. what family values? which were in Russia 900 years ago, or house building or which developed 300 years ago? presumably here they are then destroyed. at the beginning of the century, both in our country in pitch and in fascist Germany, there were socialist family values. children should have been brought up by a family team as such, too, should not have been, people had to live in a communal, hostel, etc. wow, these family values ​​exploded and were undermined all the time. here is the ruchatzo.
about culture, too, is nonsense. the future of man lies in the fact that cultures as such mutually assimilate and are anilized into one fairly unified culture. this is facilitated by scientific and technological progress and the simplification of the transfer of information between national cultures. those are now converging on those mechanisms that in general have created national - cultural differentiation. and even if we consider nationality, then modern Europe and all East Asia are tribes of barbarians who appropriated and assimilated the cultures created before them and in other lands. that's actually all the wisdom of the ancestors.
there is still something about the secret pitch of boyars and obedient to the console hops who obediently buy kinzo for 5000 rubles
.... Raising girls and boys according to common standards. This is done not so much to instill masculinity in women, but to take it away from men.
ahahaha. Well, everything is clear with the author of the text.
the text is extremely sad, I ate it mastered
Here are your texts really without half a liter of horseradish you can master, where are the punctuation marks?
Can you say that the author is an anti-Semitic fascist, since he observes punctuation? There was one pepper that looked like you - he also wrote without punctuation marks. So I pointed it out to him, after which I was called an anti-Semite fascist ...
The fact is that in all historical times the bulk of revolutionaries was precisely this category of the population. A young man has a peak of physical and intellectual activity by the age of 20, he is healthy, smart, hot, principled and uncompromising. Dangerous, isn't it? Suffice it to recall that Alexander the Great was only 20 years old when he began his "career", Prince Svyatoslav at the time of his death was no more than 30 years old, Ivan the Terrible took Kazan at 22. And in our time (especially in Europe) at this age young people are considered "adolescents." This is what the upbringing of social infantilism is designed for, to turn the maker of history into a healthy and safe fellow.
I suppose the author did not take into account the fact that it was in those very historical times that it was already a matter of happiness for a man to live to be forty-five, and death at thirty was commonplace.
2) Raising girls and boys according to common standards. This is done not so much to instill masculinity in women, but to take it away from men.
And somehow it turns out that there were more courageous women and feminine guys in the same historical times than now. Naturally, in terms of character, not appearance.
3) Instilling an egocentric picture of the world. An egoist is a loner, well, how can you not quote Mayakovsky: "... one is nonsense, one is zero, one, even if very important, will not lift a simple five-rod log, especially a five-story house ...". Or "divide and conquer" as the ancient Romans said.
Here's the thing, an egoist is not an egocentric, and an egocentric is not an egoist. How can you argue about something with the author, who is confused in his own concepts? Although okay, the meaning is captured, although I never saw in the text what is bad about the selfish way of life.
Formation of the image of a "successful" person. To test, this "successful" person is nothing more than an image of the ideal slave of the system. A tie, a jacket, a dizzying career, a great home, an expensive car, a vacation abroad, Irish whiskey. Great, huh? Here is a lucky man, but in reality he is an ideal serf-slave, because he depends, like a drug addict, on his things. Therefore, he will do everything to maintain the stability of the system, he will endure any humiliation on the way up the career ladder. He will hide all his childhood dreams so deeply inside himself that he will forget himself, turning into a humanoid creature, into a geek.
This includes other images of "successful" people. Here there is a "cool" hefty guy with a beer in a bar, and a "bitch" who changes men like gloves, and a feminized madam, and a gangster. In general, for every taste and color. Choose what you like. There is only an image of a defender, an image of a warrior, an image of a mother, an image of a poet, a scientist, etc. Some distorted substitutes for natural patterns of human behavior.
As in all times, the image of a successful person changes over time, the only question is, how is a successful person in the thirteenth century better than the one in the twenty-first? Or do you want to tell me that all roads were open to a serf peasant or a poor artisan and anyone could become an artist or a scientist without any problems? Do not laugh, seriously.
And then Ostap suffered, the author recalls progress and development only when it does not contradict his own principles, which is an example of an egocentric way of thinking, which he also condemned. There is even nothing to comment on.
Self-Murderer
I believe that the author did not take into account the fact that in those very historical times, it was already happiness for a man to live to be forty-five, and death at the age of thirty was commonplace.
What are you, did you live in historical times, or are you saying that because you were taught that way at school?
People in the villages live long-livers, I don't even stutter about the Caucasian auls ...
And somehow it turns out that there were more courageous women and feminine guys in the same historical times than now. Naturally, in terms of character, not appearance.
Well, here's the same thing: give out a time machine in the garage ...
Here's the thing, an egoist is not an egocentric, and an egocentric is not an egoist. How can you argue about something with the author, who is confused in his own concepts? Although okay, the meaning is captured, although I never saw in the text what is bad about the selfish way of life.
As I understand it, you are an egoist, don't you, lower one. Well, duck, if people didn’t think only about their vigod and their basic skin, the country didn’t have what it is now: the western education system (moronization), and other riffraffs from the 5th column, privatization, corruption and the rest of the feces ... Thanks to such a human quality as dedication, we won the Second World War, although an egoist does not understand this, it is alien to him. On this topic An interesting film about modern guys who fell into the past, - in the times of 1941-1945. "We are from the future".
As in all times, the image of a successful person changes over time, the only question is, how is a successful person in the thirteenth century better than the one in the twenty-first? Or do you want to tell me that all roads were open to a serf peasant or a poor artisan and anyone could become an artist or a scientist without any problems? Do not laugh, seriously.
The egoist did not even realize that the peasant could not even think of leaving the land, in fact he was an artist, because he worked with a soul, I will say more, he was an inventor, the most striking example is Lefty.
----------------------------
As they say: before the pig beads to the sword.
People try to convey the essence of things to the blinkered idiots, and they turn up their faces, apparently such is their fate - living corpses.
Balda716
What, did you live in historical times, or do you say that because you were taught that way at school?
No. But I dare to suggest that the author of the article also did not live in them and does not have a time machine, which does not prevent him from asserting that Alexander the Great was only 20 years old when he began his "career", and Prince Svyatoslav at the time of his death was no more than 30 years old, Ivan the Terrible took Kazan at 22. Most likely, he received this knowledge at school under the program of the Western education system.
In the villages, people and sow the day long-livers, I don't even stutter about the Caucasian auls ...
I understand that they do not use soap and toothpaste there, exhausted working from dawn to dusk, giving most of the harvest to the feudal lords, and also never visiting cities, obtaining food by hunting with a knife, bow and arrow, as well as gathering ? Personally, I have not seen such villages with auls.
As I understand it, you are an egoist. You understand
correctly. However, I am one of those egoists who are constantly trying to develop myself, taking everything from life, and not sitting on my ass, trying to convey to everyone the truth known only to him.
if people didn't think only about their vigod and their basic skin
It is in human nature, any reasonable person first of all thinks about his own benefit. But if for one person it is calculated in hard currency, then for another it may consist in satisfying his views and principles, even if this will worsen his physical or material condition.
The egoist did not even realize that the peasant could not even think of abandoning the land.There
is evidence that it could have come and was often thrown, but, unfortunately, they are known to me only from historical books approved by representatives of the Western education system. And since I am not the author of the article, I am obviously not allowed to use them.
Self-Murderer
Most likely, he received this knowledge at school according to the program of the Western
Soviet educational system , they have Stalin's textbooks there on Kramol, by the way, Jews teach their children from them, and they want to know more than anyone else, while others do not know a fig ...
I understand that they do not use soap and toothpaste there, exhausted working from dawn to dusk, giving most of the harvest to the feudal lords, and also never visiting cities, obtaining food by hunting with a knife, bow and arrow, as well as gathering ? Personally, I have not seen such villages with auls.
Well, how can your replica be linked with the life span then / now?
It is in human nature, any reasonable person first of all thinks about his own benefit. But if for one person it is calculated in hard currency, then for another it may consist in satisfying his views and principles, even if this will worsen his physical or material condition.
Here you are repeating the simulator-Freud, while a highly developed person is not selfish, but on the contrary thinks about his own kind-tribe. I have already spoken about heroic deeds. Well, since a person is not a brute endowed with intelligence, as follows from Freud.
There is evidence that it could have come and was often thrown, but, unfortunately, they are known to me only from history books approved by representatives of the Western education system. And since I am not the author of the article, I am obviously not allowed to use them.
There are exceptions, and when the system collapses, then in large quantities.
Yes, everything is allowed to you, man, you are Finn, consider that Russian, the more you grew up with Us.
And I do not care, I am an egoist, a cynic and a supporter of selected morality. Bad is what I think is bad for me, good is what I think is good.
For example, I believe that prostitution, same-sex marriage and soft drugs should be legalized. Patriotism for me is a consequence of state brainwashing. I consider money to be a universal tool for achieving goals. Consumerism? What's wrong with that?
It is in human nature, any reasonable person first of all thinks about his own benefit.
Selfishness should also be with brains. There is a momentary benefit, which will later affect. And there are rational decisions: well, you donate a little for others, then they will help you in something.
The fact is that in all historical times the bulk of revolutionaries was precisely this category of the population. A young man has a peak of physical and intellectual activity by the age of 20, he is healthy, smart, hot, principled and uncompromising. Dangerous, isn't it?
And then! :) In the zero years, it was minors who made up the bulk of the same skins!
It is very important to find a balance between altruism and selfishness. You need to be rational and far-sighted - soberly assess the importance of your own and others' interests and, based on the conclusion, make decisions - in favor of yourself or someone else. "Good with fists" is the best principle.
Well, pay for some services and use them, well, it will go to the benefit of the state, so what?
Gauguin
In the realities of the modern social model of behavior, selfishness has long dominated, and helping one's neighbor is perceived as a weakness. I would say the current charter for success is as simple as it is prohibitively dumb. In mutual mutual assistance with others, both parties benefit if you look at it from the perspective of benefits.