The optimization of the game (F.E.A.R. 3)
Here I share those,from whom, and how the game goes,I have at max(1680*1050)the game gives 35-50 fps on average,to be honest,I expected better optimization for four out of five in my opinion.NOVAKK
Optimization is much better than crysis 2
Lol,do you know what is optimization?
GAME IS SO-SO.... TYPICAL SHOOTER. OF COURSE IS NOT QUITE WHAT THE FIRST PART OF THE GAME. AS THE SAYING GOES THE FARTHER INTO THE FOREST, THE MORE WOOD. RUNS NORMALLY 55-60 FPS, BUT STILL CONTROL THE MOUSE WHAT IS A AFTER A HARD IN THE TRUEST SENSE OF THE WORD, AS IF SHE WEIGHS 5 POUNDS.
CanyonSOAP
In both games the optimization is decent in Crysis 2,to FEAR3
NOVAKK
You have judging by the video the game is not 90-120фпс and 45-65.
1280x960 , All options on Very High , FXAA Antialiasing , 35-45 fps for me is fine :)
NOVAKK
This is nonsense,since you say that the optimization is better than crisis 2.There and better graphics,that's why she shows less fpsov,and optimization-this is the ratio of graphics/performance,and Fira the like.Now I understand why lol?
NOVAKK
If you do not notice that the discussion is not the graphics,namely frames
Read the topic name.And then you say,what the discussion here goes,OK?Ratio not be I'm just a fool already knows what optimization.
NOVAKK
you would still have written what you have in КоДе2 300 frames,and, in this optimization better than Feare, as there are more frames, the same thing that you compare the FEAR with the Crisis!
sht2ket If you haven't noticed, I compared the game 2011 is identical in relation to the gaming industry. But if you want to say that fear SUCKS graphics then believe me not everyone likes everything and in crisis. If you criticize optimization and graphics in crysis 2 then I personally do not like these are not natural and sometimes pointless the sun's rays everywhere. There are a lot of bugs with disappearing textures. And most importantly, subsidence and instability on every level differently ,if every level was created on different engines. And if you think I'm picking on crysis 2 , I would say that F3AR as my stupid mindless shooter for the mentally retarded and crysis 2 is a masterpiece of graphical leap forward in the gaming industry in 2011.
NOVAKK
just you compare the bricks with the stone,the Crisis will give less FPS because it's heavier,and FEAR much,as it is empty.
sht2ket Not I began to compare. I just analyzed what works on my computer and you got it all wrong and started a pointless argument.
With my (4-core) Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40 Ghz, 4,0 GB RAM, ATI Radeon HD 5770 Sapphire Vapor-X Windows 7 Ultimate x64, high with off vertical synchronization, with a resolution of 1680x1050 with fxaa antialiasing. Game calmly gives 55-62 Fps!!!
CanyonSOAP It because of the crack. Need a new from skidrow. Like this http://www.playground.ru/cheats/44714/ but I'm not sure
I5-2500k 4.5 GHz
GTX 570 sli 780 Mhz
4 GB DDR 1600 Mhz
On Full HD with the highest settings the FPS is below 60 frames fell, so that by powerful computer the game is tuned properly.
I don't know about most powerful, I have flies and a 260 GTX, so the super powerful iron's not necessary.
The main question that torments me is how to remove the effect of turbidity this (all blurred). What is the maximum speed that the minimal effect is the same, painfully pisses me off the effect in FPS. Options same settings bloor, depth of field in the game no way.
Vidyuhi GTX 580, percent core i7 2600, 4 GB RAM, 60 fps with the sync, but the aliasing is FXAA if on 4 to put it will procedat fps though somehow strange...and even though 60 fps if looking at his feet when you go you're somehow a jerk move podmahivala chtoli, and 60 fps. Bad game is bad optimized...
^here, I noticed that too...and it does not lag and freezes are not because everything goes perfectly, and the fps are through the roof, so game soma such, that is to say, optimization is not very...
Config=VeryHigh
VSyhc=Off
AA=FXAA
Res=1920x1080
FRAPSLOG
minmaxavg
valaska 1080p