24\" curved monitor 140+ hz
I want to change the old 22" monitor, after upgrading the system, for something fresher, I took a 3050, so I see no reason to take 27" qhd (although at first I considered this option), 24" is enough, I want a bent one and with a high hertz, what would you advise ?24 inches, and even curved, and even qhd! Why not a screen from a smartphone or even from a smart watch?
What will you see in a 24 inch monitor? Take 32, that's it! And not too big, and the curvature will give the effect (the larger the screen, the better this effect). I would recommend samsung c32jg5x.
32 inches, qhd, 144 Hz, VA matrix.
Low price, high quality, convenient for both games and reading, excellent black color reproduction, high contrast. The best of the budget class. Price tag around 30k.
The only negative is not a comfortable leg (stand). But the monik can always be attached to the wall!
Believe me, you will understand the difference right away, between 22 and 32 inches. It is MUCH more comfortable to play on a large monitor. I switched from 27 to 32, and when I played The Witcher 3 already on a 32 inch monitor, the game changed a lot! Can't be put into words. So size matters!
Salarych wrote:
24 inches, and even curved, and even qhd
If 24 inches, then he probably wants a fulka, for 27 inches he asked about a higher resolution. Curvature in such a diagonal is a normal solution, 1500r is quite convenient in games, though I don’t know how with text and with such a matrix, but it doesn’t need it.
inkoggnito wrote:
24" is quite enough, I want it bent and with a high hertz, what do you advise? What
do you have for your budget? There are from 17 to 20 thousand rubles on sale from a dozen of these monitors.
inkoggnito
Yes, it is better to take 32 today. The stiffness is more noticeable.
And a place to be, and not too close to sit)
You'll get used to it in a week.
VETER15
32 "if you take it, it’s obviously not on the Magdeburg fullk
, I don’t care at all, I would consider both of them, are there any significant differences there? from 17 to 20k? I didn’t write about 24 and qhd at all, I wrote that qhd is only for 27" and I don't have such a video
The strain of a video card does not depend on the size of the diagonal of the monitor, but on the resolution. and ku chd, as I understand it, all sorts of 2k and 4k screens. this is a big load on the video card. only if you are not going to buy a small monitor with a high resolution of 2k, for example, to roll it at 900p and for 140 hertz it should be about the same or a multiple of 2 times less fps for normal operation. for all this you need a powerful card or this low settings aaaaaa111!!!!. and even the budget from 17-20tr is the
key to what kind of experience you want from PeK.
I switched from 27 to 32, and when I played The Witcher 3 already on a 32 inch monitor, the game changed a lot! Can't be put into words. So size matters!
when I went somewhere from 24 inches (actually less than a 3k4 monitor into which a full HD 1080p was squeezed in) to 27 inches and 4k the witcher 3 became like gothic 2 with a mod to return on a modern monitor. here. pek-pek has changed.
inkoggnito wrote:
I would consider both of them, are there any significant differences? from 17 to 20k?
Well, if only by design, the presence of built-in speakers, but the speed of the matrix will be approximately the same. The rest of the nuances on the monitors can only be personally compared when viewing, the same loops, light. Well, I took a few for comparison MSI Optix G24C6, Viewsonic VX2468-PC-mhd, AOC C24G2U https://www.displayspecifications.com/ru/comparison/7d481f6d78 everything is about the same.
MunchkiN 616
I seem to have read the translation of "PROMT" from some English site, it would be better if they didn't translate it then :) I clearly understood that for a card to work stable at 140+ fps, you need a monitor with a resolution of no more than FHD in my case
Magdeburg wrote:
Well, I took a few for comparison MSI Optix G24C6, Viewsonic VX2468-PC-mhd, AOC C24G2U ok
, why these particular models? type is just suitable for performance characteristics or is there any experience of use? For example, I never looked at Los at all, I remember how they entered the market 10 years ago, I was, to put it mildly, not very
inkoggnito
They are not ok even now, although if you look in the store, you can find a normal copy. And so they have light through one, and very large. MSI seems to be quite good, and as far as I understand the new model, the old VX2458 was not bad.
well, the old one was on tn and this one was on VA, so there is no point in comparing, but what about the speed on VA matrices now, I remember that it was not very good, although now everyone praises Odysseys for some reason, I watched g3 - yes, the design is cool, but the picture is a normal monitor. I'll try to look for a review on VX
inkoggnito
If you find it, it will be a foreign review. You will have to read in English, if you know it, if not, then you will translate, everything should be clear. But to be honest, after the review, I would have looked at it live.
inkoggnito wrote:
ok, why these particular models? type is it just suitable for performance characteristics or is there any experience of using it? For example, I never looked at Los at all, I remember how they entered the market 10 years ago, I was, to put it mildly, not very good.
They still sometimes fail in quality, but I just have experience with aok, I took it for a promotion and for my price normal characteristics. I picked up the same models purely for the same characteristics and approximate price. I would only compare the viewsonik and aok they have 165 hertz on board, the same aok if you choose a copy without nuances will be good just like the viewsonik, but the view is a more recent model and because of this, full reviews with tests have not yet been found.
Magdeburg wrote:
Even now they sometimes fail in quality, but I just have experience with aok, I took it for a promotion and for its price normal characteristics. I picked up the same models purely for the same characteristics and approximate price. I would only compare the viewsonik and aok they have 165 hertz on board, the same aok if you choose a copy without nuances will be good just like the viewsonik, but the view is a more recent model and because of this, full reviews with tests have not yet been found.
And how many AOCs need to be sorted out in order to find an adequate copy? In addition to hertz, you also need to look at the matrix itself, it can be dim, for example, with uneven backlighting and littered with some shade, have huge loops. So it's not worth looking at the hertsovka only.
inkoggnito wrote:
I didn’t write about 24 and qhd at all, I wrote that qhd is only for 27 "and I don’t have such a video card
. You think so in vain. It’s clear that the new AAA will not be in 2K, but all games that are simpler and that are several years old, it will calmly go to 2K.Also, it is much better to watch movies and YouTube in 2K / 4K on a 2K monitor, after it you will not want more than 1080p.
SemyStall
I'm not one of those who retina Only admits that fhd and 24" are enough for me, for me the increase in quality (for me personally) 10% is not worth the investment. Therefore, for the time being I considered VX2468-PC-mhd as the main option, and took it yesterday, and very lucky judging by the price tag in the markets at the moment
inkoggnito wrote:
I'm not one of those who retina Only admits that fhd and 24" are enough for me, for me the increase in quality (for me personally) 10% is not worth the investment. That's why I was considering VX2468-PC-mhd as the main option, and took it yesterday , and very lucky judging by the price tag in the markets at the moment
At the price, most likely yes, because every day prices jump and constantly upward.How do you like the monitor? mode do you use?
Petruxinson wrote:
And how many AOCs need to be sorted out to find an adequate copy?
With luck, maybe the first copy will be successful.
Petruxinson wrote:
In addition to the hertz, you also need to look at the matrix itself, it can be dim, for example, with uneven illumination and littered with some shade, have huge plumes.
Well, you can compare it only if you put both monitors side by side, and in terms of the same brightness and contrast, they are the same in characteristics.
inkoggnito wrote:
That's why I was considering VX2468-PC-mhd as the main option for the time being, and I took it yesterday, and I was very lucky judging by the price tag in the markets at the moment
Well, apart from the price tag, I was lucky with the picture quality, checked it on the spot and compared it with other models?
Magdeburg
there were a lot of monitors on both IPS LG and VA, the same G3 sams, I liked the picture here more at stock settings, even on the demo screen, and everything else, as usual, a flash drive with a test, purely for broken pixels.
Magdeburg wrote:
Well, you can compare it only if you put both monitors side by side
, it's not true, but if you put it side by side, the difference is even more visible.
inkoggnito wrote:
not true, but if you put it next to each other, the difference is even more visible.
Was the G3 matrix very dim? Are the green tints very noticeable? In fact, Samsa has a good G7 from this series, but it also costs decently. Did you test the dish on a view?
inkoggnito wrote:
not true, but if you put it next to each other, the difference is even more visible.
Well, you can only check on one monitor whether there are backlights, whether there are broken pixels, and whether the brightness level in a bright room suits you. Well, the difference in image quality can only be compared with a similar model. Although, in principle, if you liked the viewson model, why look for pitfalls.
Magdeburg
So what should he look for already, if he seems to have bought a view. You can look for flaws for a long time and they will be everywhere. Just VX2468-PC-mhd is a normal budget panel. Naturally, if there is money, then you can take something like Odyssey g9.