Crafting Discussion (Fallout 4)
Well, after watching the broadcast from E3, I'm very happy.DooM 4, of course, was very pleased, but even more pleased that in Fallout 4 they made such an interesting and varied craft of weapons and armor.
We will now have quite a few different options to upgrade and collect our weapons and armor, and if earlier we could only buy or find upgrades for weapons, now we have the opportunity to collect all this from various parts, and you can modify almost everything from barrel and ending with a handle, turn a laser pistol into a rifle or something completely different, which made me very happy. In this case, not only the appearance will change, which of course also looks very cool, but it will all affect the characteristics and properties of weapons and armor.
No less pleased was the fact that they added the ability to build houses and even entire villages while also installing protective turrets, in Skyrime, for example, your houses were often attacked, and this could only be fixed with the help of mods, but here the developers initially provided for such an opportunity.
Spoiler
Crafting in Fallout 4
Weapon and armor modification in Fallout 4
So, what should I write? I'm...um...glad. Yes, here, as it were, it’s not about crafting, but in general in everything. The whole game is a complete burden of waiting, because the release will take place only in 5 months. At the same time, in my own skin with The Witcher 3, I made a conclusion for myself, and rightly so - I should not watch trailers for the most anticipated games by me in any case.
saa0891
Well, you know, if you compare some facts about the previous parts. Then the gazebo has a fad, the opportunity to become more significant for the factions. If we take FNV, then we will see that it was possible to make the casino your own. Add megalomania, add the ability to build settlements, season with different factions, in the end we will get a full-fledged creation of our own faction, with the ability to seize control over the wasteland. All the prerequisites are in the videos. And at e3, not all the features of the game were shown.
XBoy360
Well, the Witcher .. The biggest mistake of the Witcher is to hang a sandbox on such an engine.
XBoy360
Yes, here, as it were, it’s not about crafting.
I personally was very pleased with what the developers did, if in the past parts crafting was very simple and limited only to installing just a few upgrades and repairs, then here it looks gorgeous, so many different modifications and options , and you yourself can configure everything, it is implemented very interestingly.
Not only that, they also added crafting and armor modification, and it all looks great, you don’t just dig in the menu, but the armor is installed in a special grip and you put the part you need, and you can immediately see how it changes appearance.
Krypto
Yes, everything is fine with the engine. If you want divine graphene, prepare PC standards. On my conf in the profile, Witcher goes to a stable 30 fps (with a lock so as not to jump), at 900p, everything is of transcendental quality, except for the shadows and the detail of the vegetation distance, they are on high, cut down the DOP and blur, because. I can't stand it. Facial expressions - shine, textures of 90% of the world, objects and characters - fine, special effects - chic. What's wrong?
EX0800_
In my opinion, this is just Fallout, and if it is correctly implemented, you can generally convey the atmosphere of the post-apocalypse, arrange a war of factions and protect your settlements, with all the consequences, but this is with the proper approach.
Another thing is that in the game it will be done simply like in Skyrim, the developers only gave people what they wanted and did it themselves in mods, and no one is forcing you to do this.
Look, in The Witcher 3, they simply didn’t make a chest and how much whining and hemorrhoids, that there’s even nowhere to put loot.
That's right, they let me out before the cold weather, so that it would be comfortable to sit at home with a cup of tea and zadrot in folich! Tricky bastards!
saa0891
no I don't argue it might even be super cool but for now I think it's personal )
XBoy360
Almost everything is not so, for me the witcher did not fully live up to his expectations. According to the plot, according to the game for ciri, and other little things. He completely disappointed me. Witcher books, amazing humor, mediocre plot. The Witcher 1 plot is still average, The Witcher 2 plot has become worse than in the first one, but a graphic was added. And finally, The Witcher 3, most of the "innovations" were brazenly stolen from other games. They say interesting side quests, but in the first witcher they were many times more interesting. The atmosphere that the books evoked completely evaporated, and there was almost no trace left of the beloved Gerald. And now the graphics. The faces are beautiful, I don’t argue, but these beautiful faces are far from the 2nd witcher and have not gone away, just their capabilities have been slightly corrected. Grass and leaves - here you can faint. They are exactly the same as in AC 2. Staging the battle? yes beautiful, I do not argue. Control, Well, for me it was usual, but many, many people cursed at him too, their Herold could not enter the door normally. Roach (I honestly don’t understand the hype around the name, she was also called in the books) I’ve never met a horse dumber in my life! What about the waiting time, and the correction of all errors (due to the ill-conceived development of the engine)? Yes, I got the impression that they released it raw. In general, the Witcher 3, with even more jambs and disappointments, remains not a bad game, but far from the best in the genre, and it is still very far from the game of the year (if the gazebo with bivarks is not specifically faked). Just another reason why The Witcher 3 disappointed me, Sapkowski's books were sacred to me, better than any Tolkiens, Zelazny and Perumov, but the Witcher 3 raped them. Here are all the errors. And yes, GTA 5 will be better in terms of graphics, but it eats up fewer resources and the engine is to blame. Other than that, The Witcher 3 is pretty good. and this is my IMHO, there is no need to holivar and prove something with foam at the mouth, I will remain with my opinion, you with yours))
Krypto
"... for me, the witcher did not fully live up to his expectations."
This is because you have him as a HEROLD. -_-
Krypto
"... for me, the witcher did not fully live up to his expectations."
You re-read at least sometimes what nonsense you write.
AMGhost
Well Gerald, it's a trifle
.NorthernSky
I'm reading it and I'm just saying my opinion, with each new game the plot got worse and worse.
Krypto
Yes, where does your opinion, which is "very important"? In your opinion, the witcher did not live up to HIS expectations, did he? Geralt is dissatisfied with the game about himself))))))
Fallout is not such a serious game that such a trifle as crafting villages would be inappropriate in it, especially since there were a lot of glitches in the mods, and here the developers themselves tried.
the video shows how armor is crafted and the names of power armor t-60 and x-01, x-02 flash by, well, everything is clear with the rest, t-45 is an unsuccessful version of the old one, which was stopped being produced and abandoned in Washington, t-51 is the newest the US development was developed shortly before the nuclear war, it seems to be the best. And t-60 and x? x-01 and x-02 are like armor developed by the Enclave, but the t-60 I don’t remember anything at all, it looks like science went further in Boston and they developed new armor that they didn’t have time to put into wide production.
NTrojan
In Boston, it's like a scientific institute, maybe it's their development (t-60).
Oh yeah, you probably also noticed that power armor can be dyed.
Z01-Ange
I didn’t pay attention to the decor, but about the institute - if it’s a pre-war MIT, then it’s just in Boston and could have time to make armor that in the end they didn’t have time to take out and no one heard about it, I understand that the massive armor in which the pre-war soldiers are dressed in the trailer, this is it, and if the institute is post-war, the one that developed the androids, I doubt that they are, judging by what they said in F3, they are doing something prohibitively scientific there and BS, compared to them, are children in the sandbox, and they wouldn’t call armor T, if it were new, they would call it something else, so it’s probably the pre-war MIT that tried))