Magister Alvin (The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt)
In the first part, almost the only choice that could somehow affect the plot of the subsequent parts was the choice of "giving Alvin to the Wild Hunt."Question: does this choice affect anything in part 3 of the game? Does it transfer at all?
In my opinion this is one of the few serious jambs of this game. The decisions of the previous games fucking do not affect anything. 1 sq. if Summer is alive. Everything. For the rest - a remark in a dialogue, or a letter, or a note. It upset.
st029
And if there is Shiala survived???? And then I killed her in the second part
JOKERIVAN
SpoilerYes, according to the plot, she is tortured to death in prison. She will ask to be finished off. Yes, Summer was right, it turned out that Geralt was a cruel person who saved her.
Anzhelika04
Can I have a screenshot of this letter?
It's a pity Alvin will not be in the game, I was still waiting for his appearance in the third part. They leaked a very suitable character, around whom one more intrigue could be stirred up.
Wild Rider
, moreover, they leaked the entire first part with this. After all, it turns out that the choice in the end is no choice at all.
Ilya Rak
, yes, if the game went through the order and met him in the second part.
Ilya Rak
I agree, it would probably be too ingenious for the projects to create a situation in the third part in which the living Alvin from the first part in the ranks of the Wild Hunt would somehow interfere with Geralt, affecting the ending of the entire trilogy.
Haven't done the Wild Hunt yet. It will be a shame if there are no such sharp turns, as in part 1.
At least some tweaks in terms of combat and small changes in the plot - it would already be nice to see the fruits of the choice from the first part.
Anzhelika04
Yes, if you passed the game for the order and met him in the second part.
I know. That's just it there unless it's extras.
Does he appear in the third part?
Renox
Wild Rider
Alvin is the grandmaster who dies
SpoilerIn the first chapter, Alvin can be heard to have constant dreams about winter. Jacob had the same dreams.
In the fifth chapter, Triss rightly notes that if Alvin can already overcome the protection of the amulet, then he can be transported to any place through space and time.
When meeting with the Grand Master in the cemetery swamps in the fifth chapter, he will tell Geralt that he does not owe him anything, since he has already paid in full.
In the epilogue, the Grand Master, in a conversation with the witcher, uses the phrases that Geralt spoke to Alvin in the fourth chapter.
If you give the soul of the Master to the King of the Wild Hunt, he will report that the Grand Master was known to the witcher under a different name.
The amulet that can be found on the Magister's body after returning from the Ice Waste is Alvin's worn amulet.
creative2901
Yes, it is clear that Alvin is the Grand Master.
It's just that there can't be Alvin in the world of the Witcher. The only Child of the elder blood is Ciri.
Renox
Well, it's not the only one. It's just that the rest did not live up to the time of the game.
Renox
It would be better if we were chasing Alvin instead of Ciri in part 3 .... she is painfully kumar, and there are plenty of her in the book series. We need new personalities.
creative2901
Those who come here and do not ask a question about the title of the topic already know everything.
Renox
Some people who have uncontrollable magical abilities and are able to go into a trance are not required to have Elder Blood. In one of the books there was just such a girl who they wanted to burn at the stake. Like in Baptism by Fire.
Wild Rider
Alvin is not only the source, but also moves in time. As is Ciri. It's basically analog.
Renox
If you try, you can pull Alvin to the Source (restrictions in the abilities of the representatives of the Source are not described) and to the Elder Blood, proving that the game witcher is non-canon. Well, Sapkowski kind of accepted the plot of the first Witcher, didn't he?