Moderator Fair Pvp OG. Voting is. (Diablo 2)
Create, don't hesitatePaste one year ago below. Not changed exactly nothing.
1. Scam has never worked, and, at the same time never caught was not. On the contrary - always was bortsuny for the rights of "ordinary mortals, to whom by now are himself"(the last theme, if I remember correctly, was about unfair when 3 nerds in the tournament in cahoots sit and punish newbies(as they like to call them) due to the fact that not even hesitating(!) exchange gear in game with the console fair, directly at the tournament. When the turn comes to the next world(as they like to call them), those asking the question is his sidekick-type: bh, bro esti doski light castnut es nada? The topic was, and to this day is hanging, I guess. There I described, but the tournament is legitimate, unfortunately. In the subsequent circus performances, where ATTENTION, dinamicheskogo druid weaving winrate(!), I was not involved.
Even if it was unintentional, but the fact was the place to be, and I am categorically against such. forums.playground.ru/diablo_2/turnir_fair_pvp-91..
2. Possibly help everyone - no comment.
3. You know, if not all, most of the nuances of the mechanics of the game.
4. Actually, what I did not like any avid diablomon nor the local representatives of the administration of my integrity, proven not once.
5.
Spoiler
Soon to be local primaries, I'm sure - will emerge every. I would like to be the first with all the criticism and wishes.
Vozmezd1e wrote:
ewe odin neadekvat i troll v izbiraetcya admini;)
a nu ka, poeasni
irknet
It is already the fifth hour of silence. Despite the fact that I have read.
I tozhi want modernizing. I'm the only one to do anything I will not. So sometimes to kick AFK from TVT
In fact, very worthy candidate. Though in appearance it seems inadequate, but the player is experienced, impartial, competent, pays the game a lot of time, sacrificed enough of its own resources to the funds of the tournaments. But the current administration unfortunately he's the moderator will be, because not each azmodan and green :(
vot chto bi vzat moderky bi banit onlu dynamixa za to chto on tebia kak to zapekawil na tvoem milionom phbr
DuSoN1989
What does moderka. where you saw here. I'm just a player voicing their opinions, unlike some, I imagine there are still people who have an opinion and vision of this situation, and about the PC very funny thank you amused.
OG-OG
Why? You moderku asking certain people, and subject to all create. It is logical that you need to write in a personal?
irknet
I wrote to the PM pvp admin.
You're right, for the most part, you need to solve through it, but you must understand - we are completely from different worlds and just don't understand each other.
I'm all for any important decision was made, even improvised, but the majority. I think this is the only sure method of avoiding conflicts here.
And it's not about choosing me for the position specifically, it refers to any important decisions(kick/ban/disqualification/unban/etc).
No matter how experienced and competent administrator/moderator anything - the decision should be taken collectively with a similar, but not so much that I wanted that banned, and unban. And then on the forum 1-2 threads where everybody hates each other and throw feces.
There is always so, no matter how much I watch - I think this is not normal and want to fix it and not to please someone, but because I want to.
The СпойлерOG - our candidate!
Spoiledinla, I didn't expect - if not trilink.
With regards to Dusana - the same class of experts-moderators, educated if not here, then somewhere nearby a lonely bans everything he doesn't like(although it is here, in chat, did not expect), and trying to find out the cause of the ban is responsible for exactly nothing.. He's here, by the way, in my inventory, just for fun, I did not even read what he wrote, because I know that there is nothing interesting. Even if he praises me.
Umka - the same trouble. With the laurels of the representative of the administration, I would not have got to sort things out with anyone here, and he's crazy enough. I don't want to hurt anyone, in any case - we are too different here in the game, which for almost 20 years, and we very long time don't get along for several reasons.
I'm not a specialist, but I need something to do.
The СпойлерOG - Our candidate!
There will always be something new and the new will have little to show for the previous
OG-OG
I'm all for any important decision was made, even improvised, but the majority.
You can be anything, but the decision is made to those who have the button. And she had someone specific and you can't help it (the maximum that can change that one button, but it will always be anyone in particular and not some kind of majority). But the majority opinion can you to bring him in as an argument to anything of course no binding, but somehow affecting.