Realism, which is not

These games not so much, actually (I wish the author gave a couple of examples), talking about fashion is incorrect.
NightGameMassacre wrote:
Do not you think that the fashion for realism is this marketing nonsense, helping to sell essentially the normal game sauce serious projects?
Again, depends on what is meant by realism and what purpose all this serves.

for games in General realism is not too relevant if not spoken about art and graphical style of the game
and it is here that the realism gives the game the pros because leather boots with the path tracing look like leather boots almost peck-peck. and if the style of play like real vision or camera then everything should be very realistichno and it affects the immersion and probably a big budget project with hypertrophic models and styling but this is not very well perceived. and in General it is some need of 3D graphics.
otherwise, the relation is more appropriate to define the plausibility and then you need to plug all sorts of reservations which can be divided into gaming terms and gaming conventions. gambling terms is a set of facts in which the world exists. a Convention is a different kind of gameplay crutches for comfortable and interesting pastime player with fixing it only on the most interesting appear.
therefore, in the everyday sense of a description of the realism and not realism like this
- there is not podaleku fire-breathing draconic that has seemed to hint peck-peck and that's where we get under the flap and a jet of flame - the character regenerates grunting behind the boxes gets up shakes the ashes and continues to hit as if nothing had happened. and how realistic it was peck-peck assume the character died then he will start there burn disease, to this is added some gangrene to go with myltse and then persons remains all so beautiful. and all because the armour-bras.
so Igor is important to avoid situations when the player gets to a certain implicit trap in which he loses the long gameplay, adverse effects, and the processes which act much like any long-term stuff when the player loses the progress from the legendary victory and so forth well, there is skipping some routine because there's even some say that their animation is picking carrots annoying they want pressed E and carrot right there in the bottomless inventory here. in this super realistic shooting klasika to echo so tra-TA-TA-TA and the wind blew a bullet, here.
so in short a gaming Convention and condoning hardcore is designed to remove a large number of similar and repeated actions that potentially bring emotional pleasure and eliminates the possibility of igrakov fair that constantly replay over and over again hoping to change that dulls the interest of different players with different speed in General.
and panelift thick barrel-shaped or lamellar armor with Vanik it is a matter of taste

NightGameMassacre
in the games realism and does not smell, all that is now presented as the realism is not just addictive gameplay, so much to discuss

What kind of genre are discussing though ?

Simulator - Football , Basketball, Hockey

What kind of games you're talking about ?

In simulations of shooters and realism only benefit, especially if the player has some knowledge. Although, I wouldn't want another WWII shooter about to knock on the key report to the headquarters, I don't remember the Morse code:) But the basic elements, like realistic models of weapons and vehicles, ballistics, proper speeds, limited inventory, able to even just take a mug from the table, or to enter any house, sometimes the need to clean the guns, realistic overview of the enemy, so as not agrilis for 200 meters across the wall at night in a thunderstorm, all this will benefit any project.