Why buy the game?
After all the games that we buy are owned by American and European firms. So, part of this money goes to the defense industry. So, for the money making rockets that kill our children....So I'm for piracy. If our Patriotic minds will produce a good game, I'll buy it. I would be ashamed to steal from her.
What do you think?
S wrote:
about all the shops owned by foreigners, I will not say - where you just get this?
Read, who owns Pyaterochka, Crossroads, Loyal, etc: personally I'm messing with the subject and the author, and you?
What kind of stupid logic is that? What is the connection between rockets and videogram???
playg90 wrote:
So I'm for piracy.
Using pirated products, you are condoning corruption and theft. You strengthen the position of the black market that sponsor terrorism. Every used you pirated product greatly increases the chances that somewhere on the border of our country through the gate will travel safely terroritsy and kill our citizens.
Games from Russian developers...
How. Once it was real, before the first crisis of the new wave.
Where are the studios where those ideas...
finally this idea is not new
and so empires rise and fade away, people are born and die, and gration... beautiful that is, graafian forever.
so the answer is to the point.
playg90 wrote:
After all the games that we buy are owned by American and European firms. So, part of this money goes to the defense industry. So, for the money making rockets that kill our children....
who and where killing your guys? your country is at war?
playg90 wrote:
So I'm for piracy.
patriotism as an excuse?... congenial!
playg90 wrote:
If our Patriotic minds will produce a good game, I'll buy it.
good buy... but not really? the main criterion for the decision is the territorial affiliation of the generating company or the quality of the product?
playg90 wrote:
I would be ashamed to steal from her.
and not his?
playg90 wrote:
What do you think?
while not really the current legal responsibility for the use of the torrent content its economic component (freebie, sir) is the fundamental factor of choice.
Legal responsibility for the use of torrent? Well, Yes, in the law to push a lot, but if you start to talk, kopiaste faces will quickly merged simple logical arguments.]
Hello wrote:
and not his?
The answer is crystal clear, judging by his own words) From their zapadlo in front of you: life on the concepts, short &)
So, for the money making rockets that kill our children
What's this guys? Your friends are terrorists?
playg90
After all the games that we buy are owned by American and European firms. So, part of this money goes to the defense industry. So, for the money making rockets that kill our children...
The channel Ren nervously Smoking in aside)))
Int0xicate wrote:
I've seen better excuses for the homeless, not able to buy a game.
I deleted your message then. Just thought... why annoy people? Recently, I came to the conclusion that people are angry, jealous, vindictive and vengeful. Why to piss them off even more?
But I'll tell you. I have a PS4. And I played all ekzy (unfamous, uncharted, last of us, spider-man). I have the money. But I see the essence of things. I see that the Incentive to sell games that can't be sold. The same game is free and even better. Armorgames there are quests! O_O QUESTS!!!!!!!!! Quests in the style of the 90s that died a long time ago. And they are there!!!!!!!!!! And they're cool. This, of course, not a complete game. Gameplay there for an hour max. But still! But still!
Int0xicate
And, by the way, RDR 2 is a casual dull boring garbage. It's TRUE. Let's compare Far Cry 5, and RDR2. These games are a lot more alike than you think. They are both shooters. There is stealth. In both games the atmosphere radzikowski America, rural America rednecks.
So what's the difference??!!! And that Far Cry 5:
1) interesting hardcore shooting, where you could get killed. In RDR2 it is impossible to die.
2) in FC5 interesting, the hardcore stealth. In RDR2 stealth just for show. By and large, it is included there only in story points. And then... there he is very easy. There he used to Rob houses at night when owners are asleep. And if you want stealth to seize ranch of the enemy.... you can not)))) Because the game design does not imply this. Stealth is not provided.
3) in FC5 there is vertical gameplay - planes, helicopters. In RDR2 vertical gameplay no. You say: So it's Western!!!!!!!!!!111 there was no Samoletov!!!111111(((( And who prevented Roxterm to transfer the action in the First World, and make a story Ala the Mummy in 1999? There would be the main character, the son of John Marston. This is a good idea. What's the problem? And even if we leave the plot at the end of the 19th century.... There was balloons. Even in RDR2 there is one mission with a balloon. ONE missie!!! ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And you know why oblivion and Skyrim removed the levitation? Because Todd Howard said, Vertical gameplay is hard to do. Here. Now think about it.
And Todd Howard removed the climbing rocks of Morrowind (2002). They can see whether it was easy to make pulling up onto a ledge in Daggerfall in 1996, and now difficult. And now think... Why Ubisoft releases good games every year, and Todd Mugard releases a game every 5 years. And Rockstar every 5 years. Yes... you can say that Ubisoft is the conveyor. And I had believed it. BUT only after AScreed 4: Black Flag I don't believe it anymore. Give me another simulator naval wars of the 19th century with the same graphics. NAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Deleted my post with links to free games. Who are the admins on this site? I went to the Playground compclub in 2011-2013. The admins there were bydleni. And the guards are even worse. Guards from the prison if picked up. You have no future. I promise you that.