Someone explain to me?

IMMOLATOR wrote:
And if I was a famous public figure (for example, in addition also a singer or a showman), a fighter for human rights, which broadcasts from the stage to millions of people? Then you would have said that I will not reveal the eyes and nothing can change that??! ;)
In any case, you would be allowed to promote only those values that are approved leadership from the top. You could broadcast from the scene or from the screens of something contrary to policy and ideological orientation of the state. It is everywhere and all, but in our country it is developed for a particular level, which, however, is not a reason for pride.

Wing42 wrote:
It is everywhere and everyone,
Nonsense.

stalker7162534 wrote:
Nonsense.
Not nonsense. In the country judge.

stalker7162534 wrote:
Nonsense.
If it's anywhere imperceptibly, it does not mean that it is not.

Wing42
Wing42 wrote:
In any case, you would be allowed to promote only those values that are approved leadership from the top. You could broadcast from the scene or from the screens of something contrary to policy and ideological orientation of the state.
Depending on how to promote ;) don't have to yell on the radio Kill Putena nah! You can do everything else...
Well, if you're SO convinced that you can not do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING is useless - you can continue to sit idly by and whine... And wrote to refute the posts on the gaming forum, it's pointless. Although, if you want to bring a little bit good - stop trying to undermine people's faith in the power of the people and in the possibility of positive change. And think about what really could make you PERSONALLY.
I'll go take care of business.
Supporting my words.
The rest is not for this forum. And do not for the forum.
Good luck.

Wing42
I heard that in Italy, Berlusconi has had a lot of trouble. This confirms your thesis
Wing42 wrote:
You could broadcast from the scene or from the screens of something contrary to policy and ideological orientation of the state.
?
And generally speaking crime is everywhere. But there is a difference between a crime against society through corruption and so
Spoiler

stalker7162534 wrote:
The whole world has shown that the timing of the Board of governors it is necessary to limit
Uh, tell me of this English Queen, the Persian Gulf monarchies, to the Japanese Emperor

sundyray
sundyray wrote:
Uh tell UTB anglitski Queen
First learn the powers of the British Queen and the Japanese Emperor.

stalker7162534 wrote:
The population of Russia itself contains.
How lovely, what demagoguery. what a beautiful substitution of concepts!!!! I love it!!!
I explain to you tight:
Now imagine living here, and now he became ill, went to hospital, and there... 500r single intramuscular injection, ultrasound 1500P, 1800 photo x-rays, on the mountain goes a lot er karoche.Where to take money for treatment? Nowhere.
In reality, he comes and just lies in the hospital without paying anything to anyone( couple shokoladok nurses to tea does not count)
How does that happen? Bingo!!! Mandatory medical insurance!
How is it that paying each time only a small amount(of fees for compulsory med. of insurance e) people spend(from honey STRAHOVAYA) then a lot of money?
Quite simply, we ALL pay fees for compulsory med. insurance and your money, how would oplachivaet treatment of other people, and they in turn pay for the treatment of other people, etc. ALL TOGETHER. Google please strahovye
Same thing with defense: can you buy a plane for $ 100 million to defend himself? no I can't, and the WHOLE country can
So individuals themselves do NOT FEED, feeds herself the WHOLE COUNTRY, by redistributing income and expenses

stalker7162534
With the Persian monarchy what do we do?
And Yes learned http://nngan.livejournal.com/203546.html what's next?

For the lazy
The monarch of the United Kingdom can:

— to declare war and to conclude peace without specifying the reasons, the Queen is the Supreme commander,
— to veto any act of Parliament,
— every year the Queen speaks to Parliament, setting objectives for the coming year, effectively shapes the policy of the state,
different detail type medals, a knighthood, the right of pardon,etc.,
is the Queen head of the Anglican Church, it is about how we have Putin and Patriarch Kirill coincided in one person.

sundyray wrote:
And Yes learned nngan.livejournal.com/203546.html what's next?
now think about the stupidity of what he said

Che that does not work your main message

stalker7162534 wrote:
now think about the stupidity of what he said
sundyray wrote:
For the lazy
The monarch of the United Kingdom can:

— to declare war and to conclude peace without specifying the reasons, the Queen is the Supreme commander,
— to veto any act of Parliament,
— every year the Queen speaks to Parliament, setting objectives for the coming year, effectively shapes the policy of the state,
different detail type medals, a knighthood, the right of pardon,etc.,
is the Queen head of the Anglican Church, it is about how we have Putin and Patriarch Kirill coincided in one person.
Argumetns as I understand it no? then drain as grits, counted

IMMOLATOR++++++++++++
Dude, you said it - better not to write. Respect and uvazhuha.

sundyray
once he could not tell, declared whether the English Queen war on Argentina during the war over the Falkland Islands? Iraq when the British allies smashed Hussein?

Here is the answer. Why. No need to thank.
Quote:
Spoilertastic and powerful socio - psychological factor preventing the active struggle of the masses for their rights. This PHILISTINISM, narrow-minded psychology. Political activists somehow believe that the average Russian citizen must act as a conscious political fighter. And it not a conscious political fighter, he is the man in the street. So he was raised by Wednesday, so he was nurtured by decades of the Soviet regime. Finally, in the last 10 years, the philistinism of the public — from TV screens and in the media — glorified, was obesos, praised and proclaimed the only true way of life and thinking — in contrast to the "damned Bolshevism".

Meanwhile, the basis of bourgeois consciousness — egoism. And this selfishness will push people in a situation of choice, not to the collective action of protest, and to seek individual salvation. The first reaction of the layman is inherent in every animal reaction to escape from danger. So Everyman prefer to fight or compromise (justification of the rationality of compromise, he will somehow find), or obedience (Babbitt, in principle, prone to obedience, as to a provision exempting and relieving him of the burden of choice — this issue thoroughly and fruitfully explored Frankfurt school), or — in the best case (when we are dealing with the most active, intelligent, educated individuals) escape. Not by chance that in Ireland emigration became so widespread: it was a kind of active action in the hope of changing the situation, but at the same time, not so radical, conscious, responsible and dangerous as the fight for their rights. You may recall the mass Jewish emigration to America from the "pale of settlement" and other similar examples. Today we are witnessing an emigration from Russia. And emigrate mainly skilled workers from the industrial centres, specialists (persons with higher education) and youth. According to the Center for sociological research of the state Committee of higher education of the Russian Federation, 10% of students surveyed would like to permanently leave Russia, 46% with pleasure would go abroad to work and only 22% — for training[50]. These data show "a state of mind," students — usually one of the most radical and open to the progressive ideas of society. Meanwhile, for the movements of protest of young people — a common social base (the average age of a soldier of the Sandinista TNF was 14.5 years).

The man in the street in extreme situations (until he "went berserk", according to the known expression of Lenin, "the enraged man in the street" is today a fascist) is transformed from a public animal is just an animal, when nothing hinders it primitive instincts. He, starving will kill and eat their own kind (neighbors and relatives),but not to organize mass resistance to the regime, doomed him to starvation.Petty-bourgeois psychology in Russia is as powerful damping factor as in the middle ages was the ignorance and the Church.

Another factor is the increasing atomization of society. Soviet society was a collective society (even collectivism this artificially maintained). In order to implement in a society of extreme stratification, it was necessary to destroy the spirit of collectivism. What was done methodically all the years of perestroika. The current Russian society was a society of atomized ("crowd of individuals"), and the atomization is still growing.

In Patriarchal societies, traditional collective (community, Guild, parish, etc.) or replaced their religious community (in cases of heresies) was the Foundation that allowed the population to form structures of resistance to power. In the industrial period, the traditional groups have been replaced by communities are deliberately organized on the basis of common interests (trade unions, associations of local self-government) or ideals (the party) But the creation of a system of these new teams, it took several centuries. In Russia the old types of collectives are destroyed, new ones have not been created.

Actively imposed by the authorities through the media, education structure patterns of behavior (individualism, the cult of personal success, the glorification of money and wealth, the promotion of "consumer society"), of course, absorbed by the population (especially as they are not contrary to the petty-bourgeois attitudes) — and this slows down the process of creating new system groups, which could resist the authorities.

The next factor — the criminalization, alcoholism and anesthesia population as a result of a sharp deterioration in social conditions. The criminalization of broad sections of the population, as we know from the examples of other countries, effectively neutralize social protest — in this case, first, a significant part of the lower social strata is able to improve their financial situation, and secondly, the inclusion of a person into a criminal structure (the structure of organized crime, the mafia) is a well — defined social protection, social guarantees him and his family, it also and growth prospects, career (even a criminal). Finally, where runs the mafia, social protest is suppressed it quickly, efficiently, with demonstrative brutality and often in the Bud. Mafia power can be overthrown only by armed force — the mafia is trying not to give his enemies the opportunity to gain the strength to do so (examples of this kind of rich in Latin America).

Alcoholism and anesthesia has always been a powerful means of relieving the social stress and dealing with reality. Not coincidentally, the Yankees solder Indians, Europeans weapons by imposing Chinese mass consumption of opium ("opium war"), and the Spanish colonialists taught the Indians of the Viceroyalty of Peru chew Coca leaves (which in pre-Columbian time, was considered a sacred plant and used just the tip of the Incas for ritual purposes), and even eventually began to settle with the Indians these leaves as currency. In the nineteenth century the ruling class in England quite deliberately — to prevent social unrest is not only being fed the workers, but imposed on working families as a cheap "proprietary medicines" for all diseases drugs (opiates). In India, the British authorities did the same thing and even published a fabulous reports of "experts", arguing that the health of Indian opium allegedly not harmful. And just recently, in the late 60's-early 70-ies of XX century, the FBI and the CIA conducted special operations at mass anesthesia those Negro ghetto in the United States, which was strongly influenced by the Black Panthers, and with the help of a group of agents led by Professor Timothy Leary introduced in the movement of student protest is the idea of "psychedelic revolution".

In addition, mass psychology has a certain rigidity, the delay in the perception and awareness of economic and social change — especially after long periods of stability. There are still many in the country are living realities of the Soviet era and can not understand that the world has changed drastically. And if earlier they were necessary to the state as a labor and military force, why is the government trying to control their lives and behavior and patronize them (which was manifested not only in the free medicine, education, symbolic prices for housing, many state social programs, etc., but in the annoying "educational" work — including drunkards, idlers, hooligans), but now they absolutely do not need the state — the sooner they die, the less consumers, the faster will be redistributed belongs to them property. A significant portion of the population not knowing (and not wanting to understand) that, still naively hopes that what is happening around — this is a bad dream that one day itself is over.

In principle, it is difficult to imagine that those who believe in "spontaneous disappearance" of this "bad dream", was capable of active resistance. It is unlikely they are even able to admit that everything was not a dream and it will not disappear before you will lose two powerful buffer, stabilizing the social situation: housing and gardens.

Currently, Russia is approximately 2/3 of the employed families and families of seniors have the housing (privatized or municipal, but actually living in the lifetime of ownership) and the same families have dachas, plots of land, houses in the village or other allotments. Housing costs — one of the main categories of expenditure in the capitalist world — so far in Russia is very low, and plots of land allow us to solve the food problem despite the rapid growth of prices for food products.

Then, when the regime in the process of further robbery of the population and redistribution of property will start the masses to evict those who cannot pay for housing, and also to buy the poor land, undermining their ability to exist "grazing" — then we can expect a "mass enlightenment" and mass action. Today more people have something to lose. When they have nothing to lose, they, like Marx's proletarian, will be ready "to gain the whole world".


Source:
http://scepsis.net/library/id_121.html
https://lurkmore.to/%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%82

I feel silly to start a topic on this site, because:
website is not about it
-cushion a lot of experts who nichrome do you know about it
-many not even 18 years old

Russian Dance....

Cheburator Founder
why?