I7-3770 or i7-4770

KillKammbest
a good option in the future to change i5 to i7 if you hit
but here everyone decides for themselves ,I personally i7 3770 60 Hz Monica missing ,as well as the 970 ,on the middle picture I like all the games ,and she has drawn a mixture of ultra+high ,and someone already 1070 inserts

KillKammbest
Have i5 already in some games loading 100% (Assasins Creed), or close to it. What would happen to him in a few years? If we take a new iron not less than i7.

_Atergros_
that's just with the new i7 again he will come to 40K ,and i5 above described, even in a wretched atrazine ,the only game from new which rapes all percent it sometimes reaches 100 in some cores and not batter all 100 and it gives 70+fps safely
but if in a few years it is not to be missed ,it is easier to sell and buy a i7 and then repeat it IF it is not to be missed

_Atergros_
there are 6 cores and i7 which he wants to buy 4 cores + 4 threads, and the performance per core even though he grew up in the best case +5% for generation had some sort of da coming up.
And if the author will buy for 25K system on the i7-4770 in the future, he will simply throw then in my build then he will be able to supply 8700 i7.

KillKammbest
It is best to your build to add 8k and take from 8700. Or the economy version as written Xeon e1230v2 for 5K with Alik. But that's my opinion. In any case, the decision for the author.

_Atergros_
basically have 4 options)
Without a change of
i7 3770(if you have the desire to drive)
Xeon e1230v2(cheap and cheerful)

and when you change the system:
i5 8400(enough for today with the possibility abgreyd)
i7 8700 (if by means of sites,set and forget)

the choice I made and ONU my profile ,then it's up to the theme author ,what he expects from iron ,what games played ,what fps and other preferences which will continue to discuss .
I will add more as wrote above ought to catch up the RAM to 16 and then just be a top machine in any case with 60+ppsmi

p.s while writing I realized that with the purchase of Opera ,the new system acquires more relevance

fustcaper13
I have i7 4770, motherboard H81M-E (socket 1150). This percent of 8 threads. 16 GB of RAM. Graphics card Asus GTX 1060 3 GB. In the last assassin 45 fps on average on high-ultra. In recent Lara about 50-60. Since you have a graphics card of 6 GB, the results will be better. This CPU you long enough. The performance in video games is strangely affected by the graphics card and the hard disk. RAM even at 8GB and percent 2014 while not particularly affect the performance.

If I comp together, I would rayzen took, but if no hurry, I think I should wait for the 3 rd series Riesen

Vova126
Balin ,5 option)) specifically reserve for another couple with a specific Amud percent .

Vova126
I do not razberayus in AMD and I don't like them!
ucher.u
i5 - Come more expensive , and the sockets of the other, I have no such budget. As I iznochalno wanted to take i7-8700, but don't pull yet, and to endure i5-2320 and 1060 6 GB , can't nasty all the time. Here Vybar fell on the menie standards system, i7-4 i7-3 is the best 9K worth on Craigslist , and i7-4 need 25 minimum to give the mother and percent.

For VIDOS in the games I watched in the Assembly, i7-3770, 16Gb, 1060 6gb all on easy, the same БФ5, ULTRA, 60 and 50 fps, assassin as well somewhere

fustcaper13
fustcaper13 wrote:

For VIDOS in the games I watched in the Assembly, i7-3770, 16Gb, 1060 6gb all on easy, the same БФ5, ULTRA, 60 and 50 fps, assassin as well somewhere
You looked there is a 3770 and not 3770К? 3770 without overclocking and this percent will be much to take in performance and 3770К well dispersed.

KillKammbest
There's someone bogged down and for some reason it's hard for me to judge. I percent drawn not only ultra image 40-60 fps in the newest games on overclocked GTX 1070Ti in 2560х1080 resolution (my monitor is 21Х9), and 35 -50 fps in SLI at 4K resolution. And in games of the past years is over a hundred. So the reason for off-scale let him seek not in one of the best processors of all time.

Edvins
The increased resolution on the performance of the processor is not affected so in 4K you squander fps due to the graphics cards.
About percent then you better check the warp. And so I sat for a long time on i5 and I in General almost all arranged. Although Batman Arkham Knight when riding in the car, fps was drapala, Battlefield 1 was not stable 120 fps (although most of them do simply not exist), in Assassin's Creed Origins it was impossible to play shadow warrior 2 has been drawdown below 120 fps and there is a high dynamics, and this prevented Yes and so on. Now percent without any problems is not something that keeps these 60 and failures do not. Yesterday played in the division, put there 144Гц and half plane so fps was 72 and a half hour running even a minimal 0.1% in the beginning dropped to 71 and stayed ie the game was fully stable not even a invisible problem. Only when zagel asylum 0.1% sagged due to the loading location. Or in Assassin's Creed Origins of Alexandria (the most difficult location) ran 5 minutes and fps as well even on 0.1% not subsided at least to 59. In CoD WW 2 On the Internet has become much easier to play because now the game is perfect smooth and aim at enemies much easier.

KillKammbest
Spoiler
Well, like Izzy game, playable 60-50 fps. + there are tests for 3GB 1060, I have 6GB, it's better
I have i5 2320 General faric 40 fps plays БФ5 30

fustcaper13
No I'm not arguing the choice is excellent, above (Edvins) I wrote it more when a little with fat rage. And I myself at the time thinking your i5 to change this percent. In General, it is more logical for you to take a 3770 but in any case not to spend 25K on 4770 (where the increase will be barely noticeable), to precedeth a year or two and there already will be sold percent on 7nm and easy to change to some sort of budget percent of which will be performance tops now )))

I have an i7 3770К is the seventh year! And another year or two to change it makes no sense. And then to completely change the configuration. This stone need to put a monument!

Edvins wrote:
And another year or two to change it makes no sense.
In full HD and longer three times. )
And at 4K he's been meh, with him it will not even start.
But it is still 3770К, not 3770.

fustcaper13
No frequency percent in monitoring what it believes to think somewhat naive. Video card it is overclocked ultra cards do not work in full HD with a 99% load of the GPU. And hence Prots are likely, it is likely that 3770К, not 3770,. and under 8 threads in General can be any percent to shove. especially since he is engaged in the advertisement.
In your case worse will not be exact, especially if you do not change the platform. But you still watch 3770К, he certainly will be better. ;)

PS. Found a visual test, which is 3770 in OpenGL

fustcaper13
And what is there to understand then? To the forums Yes go read what they write. And those in the cent straight deal. They write that the Riesen is much cheaper, and performance is the same and the memory is operational like a quick and more or less motherboard with a new chipset

KillKammbest wrote:
You looked there is a 3770 and not 3770К? 3770 without overclocking and this percent will be much to take in performance and 3770К well dispersed
without It takes 4.2 -4.3 ,which is enough ,maybe even without overclocking enough for full HD 60+fps ,but I immediately broke up

fustcaper13
removed the tests on your hardware