Discussion of optimization (Control)

Lex Raven
The above happened to see the post with the video how to fix DirectX 12 stuttering. Checked just now. I think the way it works, at least for me I know prizadeh now everything is running smoothly.

sergekarpov
sergekarpov wrote:
The above happened to see the post with the video how to fix DirectX 12 stuttering.
Even more, this method works in all games. I generally shut off this CFG in Windows and finally a game stopped freesite.

GammaX
GammaX wrote:
I saw RTX with my own eyes more than once and it is not worth the money that she asks Huang.
You need to play at home, so I not really know why.
RTX is a physically correct calculation of the shadows, lighting and reflections, in Control it applies everywhere and not like in battle for example, only reflection and lark in the shadows, in the underground lighting.
Physically correct means in reality, not just as it is now pre-rendered and superimposed. Only 10 minutes to play with RTX and then disable it, and the picture will be artificial, not real, will be visible joints landfills, and artificial light and quite a different shade in all places.
Even in the next architecture from AMD, RDNA 2, RTX blocks will be embedded directly in the streaming processors, and there can not erase, so models without beams at all. The NVIDIA is a separate kernel.

sergekarpov
I play with the RTX "drove" and not once this technology is nothing special gives for 50K(!!!) And about nischebrodsky 2060 you can not say he even AMD sucks already, and what will happen with the next generation of AMD and say nothing. If you want to fork out + $ 20K for technology in one(!!!) the game, the land you rest in peace. ROFLANEBALO

sergekarpov
"Just increase the resolution" After this, even you say nothing. What are you on 640*480 not play if it is just a "grain less" ROFL You first play on the monitor 144 Hz 4K 32* then maybe you'll understand what revolution is, and about the grain you're at school tell))))) you must be in school the coolest with the "rays" ROFL

Dogma
if the brain is not, and is not necessary here about RTX to tell another Grafotec all this technology solid business to fool

GammaX
You say +20K like for the money you do not buy a more powerful graphics card and pure rays.
20 series will love the more powerful 10, the rays as a bonus.
Buying 2080ti, you don't buy the rays, you buy 60 fps in 4K, isn't it?

Streeting
One of the arguments you have certainly what you can't see the difference?

GammaX
Dude, you seem inadequate. You clear the text that you see? I don't roll the extra money for RTX. NVidia is the same as AMD for equal performance, the rays bonus. See prices.

GammaX
1.2060 even AMD sucks already Have a AMD? What mode? At RTX too?
2.what will happen with the next generation of AMD is nothing to say Verheguen!!!
3.If the rays are unnecessary, it seems AMD mistaken, promising support for these defective rays in the next generation of graphics cards? Dude! AMD betrayed you!
PS unrelated topic - why do something about school in the comments mention usually either students or just graduated from school. Psychology...

sergekarpov
1. AMD 5700XT over 30K in performance as RTX2080 which costs 50K
2. You're a fool?
3. I wrote somewhere that they don't need? I wrote that Huang is overpric.
Not detracting from the topic - you're on your calculator once, for example Merto:Exodus in the 4K run? Resumit found. About school you're kind of crazy driven you are statistics or graduated from University to be a psychologist? Something tells me that you're here vye...clever. And you at school being bullied or what? ROFL

-Zion-
Not because 1080Ti is cheaper and does the same thing the rays have to pay extra 30K

GammaX
1080ti it as 2070 super performance.
Where to buy cheaper 1080ти 38k? For your 8тысяч to sell it needs.
I was even on the market found it for 40K, this is the region in many places it at the old prices for 58 thousand.

5700xt is a plus or minus 2070 2070 super, at best.
In the net a bunch of tests. Have not seen one where at least she would be close to 2080. You're pushing it.

GammaX
The 2nd paragraph - you're a fool if you do not understand that the next generation of AMD, you need to compare the next generation NVidia. Without detracting from the theme - Metro at 4K I did not run, but run with RTX.
About school it's just nonsense driven, moronic acceptance as soon as running out of arguments, just the you are student.
P. S. You don't forget - keep ROFLить, it's probably a decent indicator of your personality.

sergekarpov
I'm talking about the next generation said because it will "rays". Well, what the hell you're talking about grain being driven even if you do not know what you say? It is not the end of the arguments, but the fact that you argue like ordinary scholar no rays means everything from the game you'll get 10% of impressions (!!!) LOL INTO??!!! Well, if you're so funny, so I reply.

GammaX
I do not know which 10% of the impressions you say from this figure, but this game is designed, I suspect, largely to demonstrate the capabilities of the RTX, and RTX with the graphics really looks much better than without the rays. And for me personally with RTX FHD rather than 4K with outdated graphics. Something like this.

sergekarpov
With outdated graphics? So all the games where no RTX is outdated graphics? Do you see the differences of the concepts outdated graphics and whistles perdelki? Pro 4K already tried to tell you, you first play in 4K 144Гц, and then say something. Even Huang himself said that Turing's generation was developed under 4K. FullHD it's a dying standard, 4K any game transforms many times. And the rays will continue to move the head people of believers in every game.
And here you task find 10 differences

GammaX
For you 4K is a religion. Believers argue it is pointless.
I'm well aware of how it will look in game in 4K, at the time, ran the game in 640*480 and 1024*768. Will the HD, so what? How revolutionary it will transform the picture? It is not a revolution, it's evolution. But the rtx is a revolution, a completely different way of creating game graphics.
PS, why are you everywhere 144гц mention? What is it - too, your revolution? Well, I though not 4K, но144 Hz monitor, don't try to impress me more and Hertz. This is not a revolution, I have this to implement 3DVision, for example. Without 3DVision differences are minor, certainly not revolutionary.

GammaX wrote:
you first play 4K 144Гц,
Um 144Гц not able to UltraHD, because 144Гц can not in 10bit. What is the point to play at 4K resolution, if the picture is no different from FullHD, maybe a little sharper but not much more.
============
For optimizer what that strange optimise. Not that I do not, weird shaders are working, not working 1:1, they have to downgrade one level. Set the resolution of 3800, shaders had to be reduced by 1900. Set the resolution to 1900, the shaders had to be reduced by 1600. I mean the resolution does not depend stupidly refuses to work 1:1, and fps does not drop, the picture frieze. For some reason, DSR does not work, which is also quite weird. In General optimize weird. )

Given the title of the topic, it's funny how a lot of people discuss something it's not.