From whom to choose rx 580?

then palit jetstream GTX 1060 6 Gb

MagicHero
Yes, at 1060 fps more, but I fell towards radeon cards.

Like at 1060 fps , but the picture I still like to have rx 580

sovad
sovad wrote:
Like at 1060 fps , but the picture I still like to have rx 580
That to like you? ))) the picture may differ??? except that NVIDIA has physics which adds in some game effects. I was just wondering what you picture is more like have rx 580???

MagicHero
as zhee, you say, because playing a shooter game in General, the Radeon looks smoother, faster Le..

Difficult words is to convey

sovad
lol ))) it depends on the power of the video card. The more powerful vidyuhi more stable and smoother the game. And the time frame also percent affected.

sovad
I think in the distant 2000th was the opinion that NVIDIA and AMD are a little different pictures, like AMD a little more intense, in practice it is very difficult to notice.
Also AMD still occasionally have problems with drivers.
If they are not confused, then I would recommend taking the version from Sapphire, it has long cooperated with AMD and their maps are usually the most balanced and without any problems with cooling and p/O.

uga4aka
you just like read my situation, it's 2000th yuzal AMD, changed the video card, and repeatedly convinced that AMD picture faster/richer/smoother, how many cards have not changed in the same price range, NVIDIA is more APF, AMD - faster.

So based on personal experience, the choice fell not on 1060 and 580

he yuzal representatives of MSI, so I will say that with the cooling of this card as such is no problem, as with wood

sovad
sovad wrote:
NVIDIA - more APF, AMD - faster.
It's like??? faster but less fps )))

MagicHero
well, so, for the nerd in shooters that feel when you take thinking of AMD then NVIDIA, then ADM, then invidia

I'm telling you, it's hard to explain, but on paper the NVIDIA is better, but Cho me this paper when yourself convinced

You overah write, there is at least laugh with you heartily.

sovad
Yes, MSI cards are good lately, but that version of armor judging by the reviews has a lot of problems(starting with the BIOS, and ending not very good cooling system).
But if the soul is to the firm, it is possible to take their version.
I used once upon a time Shapirovsky version 3850HD card, so he would choose the most likely version of them.

Wolfram carbide
what is oorah?)

Brother, I do not know, therefore here and I write

Write at least legible, if you*byjesse

sovad
Take Sapphire't even think there klad good and Pitalovo !
The picture is different because the rough wood can not HDMI and the color is 8-bit !

uga4aka
Thanks, maybe I should just drive every kartochku in Google and see all their cons, pros and reviews

X_ray_83
about, already the third person in sapphire

Why not the gigabyte gaming version?

MagicHero
Where there is more 1060 fps ? Same to me Toko memory 6 gig is a fail now !

sovad
Because Gigabyte Sapphire is worse for cooling and overclocking !

Here are the numbers of frequency of the nucleus 1366 in denomination from Sapphire and Gigabyte all 1355 and then in overclocking !
Therefore the cooling from Sapphire is better, I can still chase her I think it's easy !

MagicHero
MagicHero wrote:
it depends on capacity of the video card. The more powerful vidyuhi more stable and smoother the game. And the time frame also percent affected.
perhaps he meant some problem Pascals with friezes, twitching.
googled: it's called High DPC Latency on GPUs Pascal. overah on the subject of 75 pages on this topic.
although he never faced. or just don't notice. or been fixed. in General, XS

meagarry
no, it's not in the friezes and not pulling in good cards as such do not, I mean the picture itself, the gameplay - from AMD it just smoother and faster