2K monitor.

Horse567
Only in some? So in all it should be.

Horse567
And I have a 4K monitor when not put native resolution soap soap Always especially the FHD resolution of 1920x1080. So that deal.

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
But strangely, in characteristics write 2560x1440, or 2.5 k. Hmm...
And the Full HD 2K then what? after 1920 it's certainly not 1000 and probably 2000. Why try to include a nerd? ))) Just, users have so happened that the type 2K 1440p monitor since almost 2 times more pixels (in fact 1.8 times) and 3840×2160 4K already called and there really are 4 times more points.

Horse567
Due to the fact that 2560x1440 is not a multiple of 1920x1080, so for example if zoom full HD 1.5 times on the sides there is a solution 2880х1620 (that is, I sometimes put the resolution in games if you want to increase the clarity of pictures) that you have when you switch to 1920x1080 pixels will not overlap exactly. Better if you bought a 4K monitor so when you change the resolution to 1920x1080 instead of 4 pixels to display one and they will go one behind the other. Although of course the sharpness of the picture will suffer but will look better than with 3840×2160 reduced to 2560x1440 because order scale pixels will be inaccurate. So play on 2560x1440 and just lower graphics settings, and the first smoothing which, when reduced to 1920x1080 but with anti-aliasing will give a worse picture than 2560x1440 without antialiasing.

Horse567 wrote:
I bought myself a 2K monitor (not cool 27 Monitor Samsung C27JG50QQI middle class)
when you put a FHD resolution of 1920x1080 is very noticeable soap, why?
How to buy that kind of thing and not familiar before with such simple nuances.

Horse567
Everything is fine the way it should be, it's not a CRT monitor))) there had no such problems ( I mean soap)
before buying the monitors 2-4-8K think pull it system and your wallet.

VOVAN WOLF
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
I have long said - a stripped-down 2k at 16:9.
If you're out there that say it does not mean that the way it is. And if the world's majority believes that 1080p is the point of the report or 1K and 2K is 1440p and 2160p is 4K the way it is and your opinion can keep to yourself and do not include a nerd
PS If you come to the store and ask about a 2K monitor, how do you think you will show a 1080p or 1440p? )))

Horse567
POLKOVNIK2005
Hm, I wish I had your problems. I have 10битах with swarmcast texture flickering disco lights. Even in ЕТС2 gash support 4K, but some AAA projects scored on this, such as фолл4, GTA, etc. Have to constantly monitor setting to reduce.
And contrary soap in full HD DSR switch, and the monitor settings look for that should help. Of course it will still be visible soap, osoblivo after 4K, but it's not.

saa0891, with everything I read before buying, was just curious, as it should be soap in fhd, it works for me, Monique is cool.

In General, do I need to enable vertical sync? The difference that I do not see that it is enabled, it is disabled.

VOVAN WOLF
Spoilerset your memory on where you have risen to 3200 at the latency CL14 2 TIMES!!! higher than Intel and he sings some tales timings ))) it's all in the misery of Riesen in the memory and in addition, the speed of which depends directly on this memory.
VOVAN WOLF wrote:
If the person is competent enough and knows how to speak correctly, as well as to consider, that will show 1080p. Of course, there is no doubt that jokers continue to buy ALLEGEDLY 2560 and call it 2k.
It's not jokers, these are the users around the world have decided to do a gradation of monitors such as nerds as why are you then trying to be clever ))) And the word nerd what are you here just to show off is pointless because even here to include the nerd you are in a trouble. If we are to speak properly then it's FHD 1920x1080, 2560x1440 - QHD because no 2.5 K does not exist in nature and 3840x2160 - UHD or 4K because of 3.5 in the nature does not exist. So don't get cocky anymore, only stupider you look and your fantasies can leave with you )))