A
A.Soldier of Light
11.01.20 11:13 pm
Film - Ant-Man and Wasp (2018)
Also known as the Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018)
Director: Peyton Reed
Starring: Paul Rudd, Evangeline Lilly, Michael peña and others.
Production: Marvel Studios (Disney)
Length: ~118 minutes
Budget: more than 162 million dollars
Fees: more than $ 622 million
Release year: 2018
And the story... watch the movie and learn 8) the Second of the world Cup, the action takes place parallel to the events in the third the Avengers.
And here is my review (tipo) ;]
Dynamic scenes, interesting scenario and course of events, no boredom and tediousness... in short, another good fantasy action movie marvel comic book and part of the MCU. The second part of the Ant-Man is no worse than the first: there are some new and well-proven old.
It is worth noting the final scene after the first credits that last a couple of minutes: a hint of a sequel and the answer to the question, where was the world Cup itself at the moment when Thanos snapped his fingers. The second final scene after *all* the credits doesn't matter, there's just shown sitting on a chair and playing musical instruments ant. Funny, but stupid =] Ants of course social creatures, but *so* can not behave, in principle, except that someone is manipulating him (judging by the events that increased ant no controls)...
Now more detail will be spoilers. Cons it's mistakes, let alone without them =]
And mistakes is terrible: the same as in the first part. Let's start with the obvious, what is clear to everyone who skipped physics lessons at school ) If we reduce the distance between the molecules and the atoms, the object such as human body or vehicle is reduced to tens or hundreds of times. It is scientifically explainable, no problem. And the problem begins where we see a smaller car or a house, someone picks up and carries with him: the change of distance between the particles of the object the mass of an object does not change, the laws of physics. Of course, a smaller car will weigh all the same one, two or a few tons, about the building, I generally keep quiet. Consequently, increased world Cup will weigh as much as weighed before the increase, and because of its motion *not* be slower, like he weighs a thousand tons as a giant. And this blooper I call mega-blunder, he repeated very often in both movies, it's sad. Is an insult to the intelligence (I like this phrase, I came up with, by the way).
The second mega-gaffe is the quantum world. No, not the world as such, it is our science 2018го years, in principle, does not know even close to actually zero information. In contrast to microcosm, which has been well studied and observed in conventional or electron microscopes. In quantum world everything is more complicated, and in principle I like how it looks in the film. However, here's the problem: how can *see* the eyes of the quantum world, if there is such a small distance that man there (maybe?) less photon? To *see* the object, from the object must reflect the photons onto the retina of the human eye, it is an indisputable scientific fact. In other words, all the way down to subatomic size, man cannot do anything to see. And hear. Sound there is by definition(!), as and light. And at the end of the movie we even saw the world Cup again fell to the quantum world and could.. think.. to talk on the phone (radio communication) with people in our world in a normal state,=] writers Themselves read the nonsense that you wrote? ) This is not a furious, really...
The third mega-gaffe - again, in the quantum world. This time the principle of reduction to the less atom. The characters contradict themselves when they say (in the first movie) about a decrease to unrealistically small sizes, smaller than the nucleus of an atom. The principle, as I said, in reducing the distance *between* atoms, it is that man or that object becomes small. But if you shrink smaller than an atom, a paradox arises: the atoms themselves *your* body or object is not reduced, only decreases *distance* between them. Therefore, skecthed a certain limit for reducing the object when its atoms become so close to each other that almost touch, overlap and collide..? But this is fraught with a more interesting reaction familiar in nuclear physics ) That is if it is possible to shrink *less* of an atom, then you save yourself the atoms of which you are a member, otherwise, a paradox. But if simple language - utter nonsense, nonsense! ) Themselves in the film contradict, hmm...
The fourth mega-gaffe is the air in the quantum world. Well, you declined, was included in the quantum world, took off his helmet, and.. WHAT are you breathing??? There's no air, the world, smaller than atoms, not the molecules of air, lol. And the plot in the Ant-Man and the Wasp wife Pima remained in the quantum world ~30 years... How?! As she lived there, what had supported himself? Food, water - no? Air there either. Yes it would and not a day lived after the flashback stopped the rocket. While PIM as a student stupid thought that she was still alive maybe there is lol. Even more lol, what the writers thought so too, and the story she's alive and back in our world ^_^ It's better than the blunders in"the fast and the Furious, emae ) There is at least breaking mechanics (the branch of physics: mechanics), and everything for the Foundation is being demolished! )
Smaller mistakes include such as the presence of animalcules in microcosm: tardigrades are small creatures with a size less than a millimeter, but it is not a microcosm, close, but no, THEY can be seen with the naked eye if you look carefully or stupid to take a simple magnifying glass in hand. This is a microcosm of bacteria and viruses, for example, animals have nothing to do. And they are in the air everywhere can't fly, that kind of nonsense? I would look on Wikipedia at least, where they live... Next blooper it's movement speed is reduced relative to conventional machine size of machinery: no, a smaller machine could not maintain the same speed for regular objects, its absolute speed will decrease in proportion to the new dimensions. In other words, a small car will squeeze 100 km/h, but for cars of normal size it will be 10-20 km/h max, i.e. the decrease of his car in the process of withdrawal from chase will give only one realistic option: you instantly catch up and overtake (well, if not crushed by accident).
If you do not pay attention to mistakes, it's a great movie with elements of Comedy. Don't know about you, but I can't ignore so many obvious mistakes, sometimes egregious violations of the laws of physics ) physics are Poor AS it is fucked ^_^
PS
How do you like the movie?
3 Comments
N
Nunu1987
11.01.20
Did not like. Barely dosidela to the cinema. Though many have come. But the acting is not bad
D
D1_
11.01.20
Ugaral
As two vehicles of different sizes traveling at the same speed.
Take one wheel of the normal cars and calculates say it makes 7 revolutions per second
how many revs should do a little wheel a little car to go on par with the usual machine - the engine just reserveda.
A
A.Soldier of Light
11.01.20
D1_
About that speech. The movie is full of such nonsense, from which all physics of the world will be shocked &)
Forcing is resting!