Do you think if I write to Putin
the killer of the Anglo-SaxonsI think you have two developments: coming harsh uncle, and give the kidneys and your kidney shot is like a liter of beer, or are you going to be one nice place for 15 days, where you quickly forget how vodka drunk and outrageous to violate...
Gauguin
Gauguin wrote:
they are smart enough not to believe in the ideals of globalization and cosmopolitanism.
Nationalists are barking, globalization is coming. What she will come to understand only our grandchildren.
kung fu master wrote:
globalization is coming. What she will come to understand only our grandchildren.
Well, I already know, but there are different opinions 8) there will be proponents of cosmopolitanism, and no, you can not prove it ) And Vice versa: their ideals seem unacceptable to conservative people. There may not be consensus, only a compromise at best...
A. Soldier of Light
No compromise. Globalization is the degeneracy in its purest form, the very essence of degeneration.
Gauguin wrote:
No compromise.
Alas, will have to compromise. And who is uncompromising, because there is just started and just religious war.
Gauguin wrote:
No compromise. Globalization is the degeneracy in its purest form, the very essence of degeneration.
It's not your sidekick metro are constantly in St. Petersburg, then in Moscow to blow up trying? And from you I some moments extremism rushing.
Gauguin wrote:
Globalization is the degeneracy in its purest form, the very essence of degeneration.
How many in this phrase of loan words? Borrowing the words of one of the elements of globalization.
A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
because of how time began and just religious war.
Alas, development is driven by antagonism.
stalker7162534
stalker7162534 wrote:
How many in this phrase of loan words?
Not so much.
stalker7162534 wrote:
Borrowing the words of one of the elements of globalization.
Not quite.
Gauguin
And that You - globalization?
When ancient people began to settle on the planet, between the divergent groups was the long distances which in those days did not allow people to communicate with each other. Disparate groups of people began to speak their own languages, though preserving the ancient roots of the language. Fragmented populations lose genes, and people became like each other well, as it is now in remote villages all the inhabitants like each other. So there was a different nation. Which then began to interfere with each other. For various reasons, primarily because of the grub, all the mammoths did not miss.
But now progress allows you to chat, distance is also not become a problem. And humanity back combined. But vestiges of the past, vestiges mad and want to live as before by an animal. With the hatred of others.
stalker7162534 wrote:
But now progress allows you to chat, distance is also not become a problem. And humanity back combined.
Yes, but in any case it is necessary to ask the opinion of the people before imposing innovations. However, I can assume that you would argue (if on, then all right, it is also true)...
A. Soldier of Light
The opinion of the people, in some countries determined by the fact that in his mind put. See pictures from the DPRK where Sashi from happiness crying next to the light-faced one. What do they ask? They agree that the divine power will do. Take the opposite pole - the United States, and view the results of the voting in the elections. Virtually 50 to 50. The casting vote is 4-5% which would not care, but what is a good move in advertising to persuade them to one side. There's the way the innovations will not impose. All stems anarchy of interests.
Whether we like it or not, but globalization can not escape. Yes, in some countries the authorities may limit, impose on the people of the opinion that it is necessary to isolate themselves from the world. But this time, because the dead end road.
Technological progress changes the society. During Soviet times, to get fashion book people went to the speculators, or collected 20 kg of paper for a voucher at the bookstore. And now the child is reading a book is surprising. Somebody impose this innovation? No. the world has changed.
stalker7162534 wrote:
The opinion of the people, in some countries determined by the fact that in his mind put.
Well said, the main thing, objectively, as it is. And so, there may be problems in making some decisions. But it's the General phrase, you need to look at the situation on a specific issue. For example, if near the house I want to build a new building, store, etc, it is necessary to ask the opinion of the residents - this is an example of democracy. Question: which countries exactly? I don't remember...
stalker7162534 wrote:
the results of the voting in the elections. Virtually 50 to 50.
Problem 50-for-50 is that this indicator shows the split in society. So here we have a potential confrontation of one part of society to another. This is not a problem of democracy, it is a problem in the stratification of priorities within society, philosophy, morality and all that. Not a single company means that with the right approach to Subversion you can blow it up from the inside. Position 50-for-50 just the most dangerous...
stalker7162534 wrote:
Yes, in some countries the authorities may limit, impose on the people of the opinion that it is necessary to isolate themselves from the world. But this time, because the dead end road.
This is the way the bans to get info from the outside, Yes, there is. Ideally, everyone should know the truth about the world and be smart enough to critically evaluate all the events and promises, then and in any such ballot the people will take the most correct, objective decisions.
stalker7162534 wrote:
Whether we like it or not, but globalization can not escape.
Read specialized literature, globalization otheruse trend. She even States refused. Cm. covered with Trampe Pacific Inc number
it is not clear why and for what reason the vehicle tries to write to Putin? tasks do not see goals))
and so to a large global p....Etsu moves, don't you think?
all these merging accounts that are now taking place... I would too since the war, made sure that in my country banks was not tide of the enemies here is very simple - and that in the future their descendants did not show my interest...))
Syria - as I understand was a kind of taranium power? exercise, sale and disposal of old stocks of weapons that the dump is worthless? and the meat we as usual :(
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
Why would in a normal debate is not to participate. That is, after reading your explanation, it is still not clear.
Just plain.
Just now, used to be a pretty huge(but on the letter of Magnus...)
Putin is not a liar(Oh, now shkololo with agregasa).
He doesn't need the blah blah on TV. But competitors need. Purely to show see Putin himself has condescended.
PS. TC write to the Vatican.
ihappy wrote:
He doesn't need the blah blah on TV
Because it asks what is Putin's plan?
