The optimization of the game (Dark Souls 3)
In your opinion how well optimized the game is, especially on a weak graphics card. Just at the time the publishers of the game played with us a cruel joke with the system requirements, particularly graphics cards.Not the fault of the developers that most Vinyasa sit 4.5 series NVIDIA (and similar era AMD). Optimization itself is quite (8 of 10).
Blame the economy and managers for the fact that the ruble has fallen, and You can't buy a modern card and not the developers who don't see the point to optimize the game for dozens of configurations.
Or do you think that Fromi have to sit and think, Oh, how difficult life players Raschke. . . well they can not afford to buy 7 or 9 series after the devaluation. . . Well, what to do, let's give money and try to optimize the game for 4 and 5 series to each Vaska Popkin 560 can play on medium at 60 FPS. . .
Well, not nonsense it? Moreover, the vast majority of these Vaska Pupkin download the game from torrent (whatever it was excellent optimization) because I would never pay 1700 rubles per game is expensive.
pochtipushkin
To the point! Update already your bucket of nuts, and you will be happy!
pochtipushkin
Shock Burst
Fiercely positive 600 series was already 5 years probably
As for me - optimize 6/10. I am confused by the fact that at minimum and maximum settings FPS almost (+-2 fps!!) same.
And if the whole at my conference FPS 99% of the time 57-60, are unfounded small friezes
As expected, the new patch optimization held at the lips, respectively, and the fps is unchanged.
Fuck them in the ass, the great utilizatori and with its single-core processor on what it is they are programmed ! Morons stuck in 2006-2007.
as in previous parts of the game is shockingly optimized settings is not enough, app as the developers
Alex Kichigin
strange , I have a gtx 970 4gb i5 is 60 fps, drawdown of up to 30 when pick up with the dead no matter what and when you log in the character menu and crashes for 32 hours of the game never was p.s I have a licensed copy
Artem59rus
Lol, I don't know why you have, so I did. I just started steam offline and I have stable fps, then started playing with the Internet and the drawdown also was not shown, all settings at maximum. Don't know what is the pattern
No, the previous parts have been optimized much better, like most, they consistently gave 60 fps and ran smoothly. In the third part of the optimization can not be called good, even judging by the comments people have problems, subsidence, friezes (when lifting things, Yes I have the same problem). Change graphics settings not as practical does not affect the fps and change the screen resolution too.
Brothers, the iron brothers, they say: And I'm slow, the conclusion: the modified optimization.
[runs out the warrior with the iron flag]
Quick steps to climb the hill, and sticks to bloody code the land around the disks, Crysis, GTA 4 and other games. Stuck with his last strength, and fell near it, and the inscription on the flag: GEEEE OPTIMIZATION?.
pochtipushkin
Of course, praise on the developers and give an estimate.
With good optimization should be captured at least one series of video cards fully below, say, 900 series, all 900 series was a stable 60 fps then it will do the optimization.
To say that the game is well optimized and the graphics settings do not affect much on the image and on the number of fps, here you have to be a huge asshole.
In the end, what we have:
1. The crappy port of a series-Coles,
2. 3 patch, which did not improve the situation.
The proof - we go to simforum and Reddit, where we read to this day about the problems that the developer does not want to solve.
And again - you need to be fierce greedy, if we talk about the optimization of 8/10 DS3.
gootwin
And again - you need to be fierce greedy, if we talk about the optimization of 8/10 DS3.
Or to have more or less sane PC or console, because let's remember that now is 2016, not 12 500 and 600 series is not recommended for.
Looked video example took 7 series - 770 and i5. In the end, no stable fps, the campaign is a bucket of nuts. For some inexplicable reason fps sags stronger in settings in ingeym.
And it's still high.
Alex Kichigin
And where you in my post see ...500 and 600 series in recommended or in any way!!!
Go to the forums on DS3, I have them listed above, there is read the threads where even the 900 series has a problem.
Or now normally, when 970 in most cases (with DS3, about the other games do not promise) a stable 60, and 980 45-55, plus a drawdown of up to 30, with the rise of the loot from the corpses and other crap. When this optimization is normal?
gootwin
This can be explained by Assembly of PCs, many seriously think that if the GTX 980 to put predposlednii generation i5 or i3 do not let Boh, all will go smoothly. For the GTX 980 Needs a minimum average i7 or the latest series i5.But as some do, behold all stalkage, and then assemble a comp with коре2квад, and complain of the top none or poor optimization. I have a GTX 970 i7 4790 c to 3.5 GHZ all is stable.
Alex Kichigin
You hike not catch up a little. You fromy pay for protection? You say is so obvious that they even write doesn't make sense. If I had кор2дуо or such crap, I would have written it above, don't you think so?
Optimization in the game is shit and nothing can change my mind. Yes, even in poslednik CoD's optimized better than this game.