Why this game lags on my PC? (Mass Effect: Andromeda)

And you are surprised that in the forum why do you have a game with these settings? Don't tell me that you're still zooming and other settings put on medium.

Maybe it's because I specified a minimum 2 Gigabyte GTX 660?

The author set a theme and go...as always...may slow further.

Percent. RAM is fine, but the video card it is advisable to replace. Preferably it is better to take 1050Ti or something more powerful, but at least nvidia 750 Ti 2gb, 670, 680 , 1030 (required with GDDR5 memory)

Aleks_m2 wrote:
definitely with GDDR5 memory
but it's just weird why the other games are on minimal (5 farcry ,dishonored, prey) where they also write min 2 gig of memory and then slows down

Yes, the none is weak
and I have a Radeon R9 270 2GB is deprecated, but this game pulls well

DemonXL1080
and I have three hours to sit here to wait for the answer
five minutes sat anyone, then say to whom it is necessary

all bent on low even resolutions display resolution on the monitor set the low

Andrei YP
well I would not say that is critical and direct, it is not possible to play ,but sags in places and fps in the beginning when you load five minutes the game stops, and then more or less

Follower Perelman
won't do anything to the engine, Frostbite 3 is very demanding on hardware
and the processor is rather weak and the map, but if the gtx 660 2gb or gtx 750ti 2gb and Xeon trample
The GTX 650 has long drags

Here with 16 GB of RAM and 6 GB graphics card slows down(Pirates).About the characteristics of the iron's theme ,generally keep quiet ))

Follower Perelman
For minimum game need at least 4 cores-4log process-8 gigs memory-video card since the GTX 750-

a very simple answer to the question!
this is a calculator for this game!!!!!!!!!!!!

Follower Perelman
dispensation on the monitor, put the lowest
And what is the solution?

The game is not worth the candle. Bought on PS4, at first thunder planet slows down greatly, then, but did not play, stupid scan all + empty planet. A horror and not a game.

It's all in the processor – it is from ancient
My friend has a top-end Core i7 2009 weaker than my Core i5 was

Follower Perelman
The game requires first and foremost a powerful video card, I was able to achieve 60 fps,but making certain sacrifices.
Spoiler
Well, compared with the previous part,there at maximum settings without sacrifice 60 fps.
Spoiler
Big difference in graphics I noticed!
One wonders why such a gap in the system requirements?

gennaz wrote:
Big difference in graphics I noticed!
Well, Yes. )
Throw your pylesos in the trash. xd))
Spoiler

Lodurr
Maximum graphics even in your office plug type GTX 1030 to exhibit anything from graphics on GTX 1080ti different will not. The only difference will be in fps, at an office gag is simply impossible to play. Well, if you think that the author of the post above the comp is garbage then show your fps and not just pictures ))) and then I can also say Throw your pylesos in the trash. xd))

gennaz wrote:
Big difference in graphics I noticed!
I have holvoe not understand how you can not see the difference in graphics between ME3 and MEA,it is also very noticeable,from the quality of the textures and ending with lighting and other graphical Goodies.
this masterpiece of horror early in the game still remember
And this is supposed to impress with its epic,Yes the Cold is a hundred times the flow of the visuals.