Bought a PC (Fallout 4)
Guys here bought a new PC, well that is ordered but not yet paid.It's like the game these system features will go?
Recommended
Operating system: 64-bit Windows 7/8/10
CPU: Intel Core i7 4790 processor with a clock frequency of 3.6 GHz ( Intel Core i7-5820K for games with HD Texture Pack) / AMD FX-9590 processor with a clock frequency of 4.7 GHz
Video card: NVIDIA GTX 780 with 3 GB VRAM (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 with 8GB of VRAM to play with HD Texture Pack) / AMD Radeon R9 290X with 4 GB of memory
RAM: 8 GB
Sound: sound card compatible with latest versions of DirectX
Disk space: 30 GB (58 GB using the HD Texture Pack)
DirectX: version 11
to compare himself unable to?
heh) it can be... the current I can not understand how my buddy inflated system specs recommended and the computer barely pulls 40 fps on minimal, and my laptop only pulls in 37 of her 45 on average... mmm? what is it like? on 3-6100 crust and 940мх vidyuhi
Kirill22092
If caught chipaway theme x8, I would look on bloggers - these x8 is enough to 1070-1080й
All can be used to take, except percent! Unless of course the save. How much the price went up?
Demons97
If this game is good build, but for new games PCT from AMD Yes, 4 nuclear not much wakes up it is better to add and buy Intel Core i5-8400 6,th cores
Chuck_Norris_
Yes, 4x nuclear
it is better to add and buy Intel Core i5-8400 6,th cores
Have Risen 4 cores for two threads, that is 8 threads, and the Intel 6 cores a single thread, that is 6 threads. So number of cores is clearly not an argument in the direction of the processor from Intel.
Demons97
Your PC two weaknesses. Little RAM, preferably 16 GB. Weak vidyuhi, in VRAM. Well, the RAM can, over time, to add. And that none to do (3 GB). Well, if the Assembly for 1-2 years of operation, and the weak PC. Although what games and what settings to play with. Well, if Mani no, it's fine.
Demons97
The game will be easy. HD Texture Pack bet have noticed the difference only in 4k resolution.
Now the game started, the result is:
- Involved RAM - 5 GB (You Have Windows and a 2.5-3Gb + game, end-to-end 8 GB);
- RAM - 2.4 GB (3 GB Your enough);
Download gtx 1080 graphics modes - 40% (1060 2 times weaker, enough for 60 frames + mods on the schedule).
- CPU loading in urban areas is really big, no wonder noted 4790. But even that's more than enough.
Sistemnik strange. What is a processor with integrated video core, 3Gb gtx 1060, when followed can take just 6 GB version. Why not AMD Ryzen 5 2600? It would be better, a little more solder. The best solution for now budgetar.
Memory, see, that would be Samsung, acquiring a second bar later.
PS Better to collect, muddy picture with accessories. Yet, in Germany, computerusers will be cheaper and better.
Lodurr wrote:
The argument in favor of Intel's core performance, regardless of their number.
Number, 6-8 aler solves today. As always, the rigid personality of his 2-core cor two Duo, which SUPPOSEDLY copies everything. Having 5 games in steam, playing andomeda fallout 4, telling tales about 4k on gtx 960, of course Lodurr just enough. And it's not talking about his 4-channel transient processor and a 4 channel graphics card. Of course, where are we up to it 4-cores.
4 cores not enough today. Besides, for the price of 4 cores is 8400 / 2600. For the price of 4 cores / 8 threads worth 8700 / 2700.
Have two PCs, for Intel and AMD and I see no difference in emphasis, those same figures. What the hell, where performance per core, actually I don't know. Well, inventor.
Demons97
You crazy! 7900X - WHY? Forward batko in hell. While outdated percent on the approach of 9900k. He swung straight at the monster, play Falaut on THIS, and even Opera at 2400. What is the optical drive, licensed Windows and SSD at 480gb.
On the first screen: the Motherboard on Z370 from Lenovo is better, for example Z370 SLI PLUS. Once You fled, take the normal RAM at 3200. BP the same watch from Enermax, Seasonic, Cooler Master, at least bronze.
Add SSD to 120 / 256 GB from Samsung. Graphics card, well, just don't know. When you take the CPU 8700 gtx 1070 / 1080 minimum. Or cheaper processor, add to the graphics card. It is better to have 2600 + gtx 1070 / 1080 than 8700 + RX 580 ( performance as 1060 that was chosen previously).
What then do You divorce? I do not understand, throw a spontaneous set of irons. For starters, this is not a forum for PC building, You are not the topic left. Then, one thing after another.
PS Roll under spoilers.
Demons97 wrote:
there is only 8 GB vidyuhi
I'm talking about the RAM. If you buy at the store, you can add the RAM. Well, at least since it was before. In General, think about self-Assembly. Pick up components and assembling a PC is not expensive. Personally, I have all my PCs and upgrades made by hand. Yes, and cheaper. Really depends in what city you live in. In Moscow and the Moscow region later gave, the choice of accessories is huge and for the price too.
absolutely stupid choice of percent. if stopped on a 4 core, it is better to save money, but to take 8100 Intel's, which is approximately equal 2400G in games. or take without insertions.
On my system (in profile) is stable 60 fps on high, percent you got worse and 8 of RAM and no SSD will be uncomfortable of course, but the video card 60 must pull.
Dako7
and without SSD and with 8GB in fulke, right on average with my nubo Assembly all the rules, do not just chasing after them. percent of VK and pull should, for the most part. 8GB operatives is still quite normal
EMPs
8GB operatives is not normal for many new games you yourself see the hungry games monitoring how much they eat... But the SSD just speeds up load all sorts of the same games and the fps is not affected, without him you can do...