Which ending is canonical?. (The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings)
What the ending is more canonical?.I've heard there are comics in which essentially the path Truly is more canonical.I can tell every choice in the game with the correct solution.And more?.To save the elves or kill Loredo,to give Stanica on the court or giving the crowd etc
As you zamonali this zipper head elf, he wasn't in the first part, in the third, too, and in the second it is purely a pilot character. If he even a little meant it would be developed not bypassed, the character interesting, Yes, but disposable.
Sam_FisherPG
Developed would say I wanted to add it as a side quest but didn't have enough time.In Novigrad the Witcher hears yorvit plays the flute he finds it and starts the quest.But according to developers they do not have time.
Lobo
In Thaler and Roche time, they have enough, any excuse you can come up with why it's not added, but would not admit that the fellow elf simply thrown out of the subsequent history of the Witcher as a waste of unnecessary garbage.
There was a time I would play in the 2 part and passed it on all the possible endings from before, a few times, I really like the game, but when you pass it over time learning all the options of events in the game, I understand that the pointy was attached only to the diversity of the game. Otherwise, to protect caermarthen would help the elf, not Rocher with Bianca and Summer, which for anybody not a secret in the second part are also present.
Geralt is suspected in the murder of the king, and given the chance to prove his innocence, and he has no reason to help a murderer and criminal ((giving him a weapon (with a fork)) once again confirming this act, his guilt in the murder he did not commit.
Sam_FisherPG
I'm just saying, developed saying that they wanted to add more but just don't have time because of deadlines.For example with the main mission of the Inquisition and many other things.
Lobo
If they say it is only to appease those insatiable though sympathetic cretins who wrote boiling water from the fact that it is not added, after was released 2 major additions to the game, and the pointy is still not enough time. If you would like to add initially or later in additions I would have added it, you can be sure. Just write that it was added only for the variability of the passage of the second game, and now became unnecessary, many would butt roast comic with him released, too, to soothe of these individuals, the developers are they don't want to offend anyone, and some even under the color cave to those not offended.
No. The second part of the Witcher in General is not Canon. In the books there was neither Truly nor Roche.
_iSTALKER_ wrote:
In the books there was neither Truly nor Roche.
Maybe because the events in the game seem like a sequel, after the events of the books. Played bad, just do not understand that the game is a continuation of the invented Projects.
Sam_FisherPG
So write as if he personally talked to the CDPR.It would be nice if added Truly, however, the game sold so well.Why then for him to spend time in the DLC?
Denis Kyokushin
This is a typical couch analyst who exposes his opinion for the absolute
darkpromo
So things to write is a need hard evidence.Just wondering where that comes from