3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20 09:48 pm

Should I take the new monitor?

The people, the question is from me. I want to change my old monitor FHD
Спойлерhttps://www.citilink.ru/catalog/computers_and_notebooks/monitors/907110/

on this 2K
Спойлерhttps://www.dns-shop.ru/product/2b13e756969c39f3/27-monitor-asus-vz27aq-90lm039c-b01370/opinion/

If there's any owners of the 2K monitors, and maybe even this particular model? Is it worth to switch from 2K to FHD? Watched a bunch of reviews, tests, but still want to hear opinions directly from people who have experience with these monitors.
54 Comments
Sort by:
N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

BigInteger
Damn, well, I have no so much money, so 30 vbuhali in the monitor!) This decided to take, because giving my old monitor to my nephew))

B
BigInteger 16.02.20

Next-gen2015
Next-gen2015 wrote:
Damn, well, I have no so much money, so 30 vbuhali in the monitor!) This decided to take, because giving my old monitor to my nephew))
Bro. Don't be stupid you! docking 4 Casar and buy yourself a really awesome monitor!
10 bit color depth! 2K and IPS, just with photos of you working. You're such a buzz from the 10-bit receive!

N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

BigInteger
I can certainly used to, but on my old monitor 250 CD too, and I like the rules)

N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

BigInteger
Where they still take the 4 Grand...))

B
BigInteger 16.02.20

Next-gen2015
Well, hang in there! Think about it, 8 - 16 million colors vs 10 - 1 billion! Count what a beauty!

N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

BigInteger
Well, now you've sowed I the seed of doubt...))))

R
RAHUC 16.02.20

Next-gen2015
can't say once did but can check

N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

ScariN
Well, if not difficult, would be grateful)

R
RAHUC 16.02.20

Next-gen2015
checked switched from 2560x1440 to 1080p the difference is not noticeable I do not see such possible ISA good matrix esle don't need 2k don't worry, they still take 1080 actually

N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

ScariN
That is the game on the monitor with 2560x1440, but runs at 1080p resolution, appear as usual on the FHD monitor? I was just wondering, you never know in some games my 1080 I get on high settings at 60 fps on a QHD resolution, and you can revert to the fire option, the good old FHD) will not imagine games where fps and lower) to Me that's what care will my GTX1080 for confident 60 fps in games on high settings at QHD. Just if you leave the monitor FHD, then where? Again on FHD, well, maybe just higher quality, like with IPS matrix with a minimum of 75 hercovka? Is it worth it? Dilemma...

R
RAHUC 16.02.20

Next-gen2015
just hard to say about changing the extension gtx 1080 will take out safely 2k and 4k, it is for, but my gtx 1060 will not be able to take out 4k will be a little fps, and it is weak, will in short, see tests on YouTube, gaining your processor and see how many will fps, by the way why you didn't buy with the index k, it was possible to disperse the processor and the purity above, my example can not drive

here are some games I have are 60 fps but not all some have settings to change the computer is not new on 1155 socket

p
pekabir 16.02.20

Next-gen2015 wrote:
game on a monitor with 2560x1440, but runs at 1080p resolution, appear as usual on the FHD monitor?
look shabby. as fkhd 720p on the monitor. soapy fuck with a climbing frame.
although it is possible it all depends on the diagonal

R
RAHUC 16.02.20

pakaur
compared to the 720 picture I like in my monitor I have a 27 inch

p
pekabir 16.02.20

ScariN
on my 32 1080p looks like shit. although it would seem the resolution difference is not too big and the pixel density as a 24 PCD

N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

ScariN
Yes, your i7 then I took almost nothing, so not to show off it)
By the way, here what all the settings in the game eaten by most fps? Well, apart from the permission? As far as I know, it's the anti-aliasing and shadows, so like? The question then arises : I'm even playing on FHD is very rarely put antialiasing on full, because I just do not see much of a difference on the eyes. In QHD, the pixel density is so high that you need if there are any smoothing?)

R
RAHUC 16.02.20

Next-gen2015
smoothing is necessary without it the picture is bad as Budo play 70godov or old console

and change the PC will not be satisfied or that

N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

ScariN
Damn, don't plan it out enough, it pulls fine. That's just monitor want a new. Now the choice : take the risk 27 inch QHD, and to deal with possible performance issues in future games (one can only imagine what will be the requirements of the new Metro or Cyberpunk), especially given how publishers love brought improvements to mind, or take a 27 inch FHD, but for me, IPS, and therefore a higher quality image, and is absolutely not to worry about fps for a long time. Can do to postpone the purchase of QHD at least before the release of the new cards and see what they show in these permits, and at what price...

R
RAHUC 16.02.20

Next-gen2015
the choice is yours I do not like waiting for the release of the new me in the fall I plan to buy a new gtx platform 1060 while pulling all bought in the new year to mining

R
RDIFB0 16.02.20

BigInteger wrote:
You're such a buzz from the 10-bit receive!
From 8-bit + FRC you wanted to say?

N
Next-gen2015 16.02.20

ScariN
Look, how about this? Maybe it is better and not ASUS?
Спойлерhttps://www.dns-shop.ru/product/51d6e1ba3eb13330/27-monitor-acer-rc271usmidpx-umhr1ee009/opinion/