Monitor gertsovka
Assembled PC with the following. characteristics: rtx 2080 ti / i9 9900k / 16 RAM.I decided to try a 21:9 monitor (34 MSI Optix MAG341CQ https://hard.rozetka.com.ua/msi_optix_mag341cq/p55675302/) then the resolution is close to 4K resolution, 100 Hz.
But I would like to try real 4K on a 27 inch. Since 21:9 will be worse in quality, the screen is much bigger and the resolution is less.
And then the question. There are 27 monitors, with 4K, 60Hz and 5ms. Liked the one with 4K+144 Hz+1ms, though in 2 times more expensive (XV273KPBMIIPPHZX Acer (UM.HX3EE.P04) https://hotline.ua/computer-monitory/acer-xv273kpbmiipphzx-umhx3eep04/prices/#cond_new)
Is it worth it to take? The choice generally is not present, it is the only monitor with a normal price tag, 4K + 144 Hz. There are still a Predator, but cost$ 3000. Is it worth taking 4K with 144 Hz. I watched reviews, modern shooters, 4K will be somewhere near 80фпс, well, not more than 100 (for example battlefield 1 multiplayer). To downgrade to 2K, and get a stable 100 fps and therefore 100 Hz, then what is the point in taking this monitor. While there, in single player you can enjoy 4K, and for online shooters enough and 2K will be somewhere to 100 Hz
Is it worth taking 4K 144 Hz or 60 Hz?
Farzik wrote:
I watched reviews, modern shooters, 4K will be somewhere near 80фпс
Drawdown is up to 50.
Bit early for 4K to take
Farzik
Less than 32 inches foolish to take.
Take 4K, 32 inch, 60 Hz traincom or g-sync.
Seen on YouTube a review on the Belarusian TV. As the telly he's a total g, but not as expensive 4K Monique in full go down.
Farzik
top comp is ultra and high fps ,and you have not one not the other will not ,but 4K
in my opinion it is better to take 2K to have the ultra and 144 of the frame I wow effect on the 4K TV saw
SPR1GGAN
I took for 4k map 2080ti and are satisfied. But the monitor 60 Hz. But for 4k monitor at 144 Hz -240 Hz and that in this resolution was more than hundred fps need to wait not a few years, that the map was drawn such fps. Maybe it's the card level RTX 4080-5080
Farzik wrote:
Is it worth taking 4K 144 Hz or 60 Hz
60 Hz for 4k or 2k for 144-240 Hz
SPR1GGAN
I'm a wow effect on the 4K TV saw
Much depends on the specific game. You need to keep the game under 4K was created (textures, resolution, various effects, etc.). For example, if you run the Witcher 3 at 4K, then the effect is zero. But if RDR 2. once everything is clear. And most importantly the computer is necessary to 4K no slow downs, retardation, camera etc.
BaatarTengu
under the singles of the questions is no,and here is how all praising 144 Hertz for multiplayer
Dogma
Why....
Some even older games, a noticeable effect of 4k. Not only in new games.
SPR1GGAN
Even more praising 240гц. And, by the way in multiplayer games. I heard that there are monitors even with 360гц.
BaatarTengu
I do 60 Hertz full HD like it))
I've seen 4K ,but 144 Hz is normally not yuzal ,this could gather 2K for APF
BaatarTengu
In older games, the textures are not 4K done. The effect is a smoother picture.
The selection is good. However, it is doubtful that even 2080ti provides steady 144фпс in 4K. But if anything at 60fps, you can always switch and the monitor is bought is clearly much longer than the graphics card. I would take 144Гц, even now he is completely justified.