Best ANTIVIRUS
say really good, not your favoriteI'm here for Avira and dr.WEB
Was Kaspersky - ate the memory and screamed. Until not end the license.
Has long been optimized and the sound changed... used to sit on the nod was all happy, fast, compact database is quite extensive, the system is not loaded, it was possible to play games while he was a computer scans. At work is avast is honestly not impressive. Home Kaspersky, it has the largest and updated virus database.
In General, the best antivirus is a Mac OS or Linux =D
In General, the best antivirus is a Mac OS or Linux =D
But there software is much smaller than in Windows!
What are the specific settings you define that this is the best antivirus? The question in the subject line incomplete, not specified - what is the best antivirus means a particular man?
Kaspersky or Microsoft Security Essentials are the best. Avast their virus definitions sometimes like Viruses sees. NOD 32 seems to work, just like in the system is sitting, it's doing nothing. Dr Web blocks well, just everything, like the motto: don't want Viruses, don't touch the computer. Avira is all that???? All these antivirus I testil... There are still German AVG, now try, nothing to say about him can't...
Long use free Comodo IS Premium. Free with one of the best software firewalls, powerful HIPS and a sandbox. Everything is free, undemanding to resources. Now the latest stable version is 5.12, in the new version 6 (still beta) even more optimized code, simplify the interface. I advise everyone to try.
I liked Kaspersky.And it's paired with used Comodo Firewall.Now I use nod 32 for lack of a better
Best antivirus - the hands and head (and even Google if very bad :D).
You can still add that even if there not the best and completely free AVG can help such thing as a sad experience and experience with something more powerful, like Symantec, with the active startup any .exe from a Contact:)
The best antivirus - NOD32 - 6 version, at least nothing more secure at the moment.
Dvn74
Especially it will be the best on the website from your manufacturer.
VITYA_KOLYADENKO
Actually the link is the manufacturers website for specific antivirus if that.
Dvn74
I figured it out. But why in the screenshot there is no such antiviruses as Kaspersky and Symantec (maybe she's better than the version from Eset). And my first screenshot really shows that Emsisoft is very good for its proactive protection, but not a jet (worse than the main groups).
And so, missed 5% of the virus is a lot if You send familiar 100 viruses per month.
redfox2013
If You're talking about antivirus Microsoft Security Essentials - I'm afraid it is complete garbage. But in some tests this situation:
First place: Kaspersky Internet Security
Second place: Dr. Web Security Space Pro
Third place: BitDefender Internet Security
Wood medal: Microsoft Security Essentials
But Borg is in fact garbage - gaining slightly more than 40% of points from the best in other tests. In that test, where taxis are not the Borg - they rule Emsisoft Internet Security Pack, TrustPort Internet Security 2013 Comodo Internet Security 2013 and Kaspersky CRYSTAL. And all sorts of Avast! Free + COMODO Firewall, Avast! Internet Security and AVG Internet Security 2013 did not catch and 2/3 of viruses. ESET NOD32 Smart Security ate catch 50% of viruses.
So all the results are different - anywhere from AVG more than 95%, and ESET - much better somewhere 65% to 51%. And viral 350000 unique files per day at Emsisoft - it certainly sounds cool. But the results again are different.
Dovakin997
I suspect that AVG is a good free antivirus. Of course he has a problem, and in my case - a big problem, but it is on the level of ESET, or even better, but somewhere - ESET almost the best.
People are you talking about arguing and trying to prove to each other?!.
Every antivirus has been created for specific needs and users. For example, unlike the others who made from some information, I will give a few explanations., Only those antiviruses which I checked.
1. AVG. this is good antivirus when you install the entire programs and components, since it almost perfectly corresponds to the system if!.. Installed Tune'utilite and Products Nero., In all other cases, score: 3 out of 10.
2. ESET and Norton these antivirus good for those who love to socialise, for example in ICQ., and well supported in XP.
5 points out of ten
3. Kaspersky. This product was designed to protect offices and similar applications, and if you for example play games, hardly it will suit you., So his protection is sharpened on licensed products, and most of the games in Russia, are not. 8 points out of ten.
So can continue indefinitely., Personally, I will not say what use, if someone will follow the example, and without certain knowledge may have problems., And who is to blame?. But sometimes trying new products, check it out.
And the Council can give such. If you want without paying more and less a good product supported by any system.
Microsoft Security Essentials, 8 points out of ten.
There is still a Comodo., But this product for those who don't mind sitting a day or two at the computer, after the installation, so you need to check all startup applications and components, that would give the permit, otherwise it may block part of the system files, but then with no problems. 8.5 out of ten.
Paid and supported antivirus software, in almost any configuration Avast. 9 points out of ten.
The rest of the licking information from other sources would say so. Almost any antivirus can be considered as a virus program because after working in the system about 4-5 months, he begins to clean and block the self is not informing and not noting in the journal., And if anyone does not know partially blocked, or the remote program, nothing more than a malicious program or virus., And should be that after the self-same changes, the antivirus finds the virus you have, after about 5-6 months, and after working 1-year, that's for sure., Since antiviruses are asked to constantly update, but the update in Russia, can the antivirus and some programs, and the system in Russia, in most cases, do not update, as necessary each year to update(and buy a new key). Deprecated features are also considered to be damaged and subjected to blocking.
I once asked on one site; If the anti-viruses misses, can't cure the program (only experts can, without consequences to correct). Finds no virus, what's he need?!.
There were those at-mnye people that began to describe; the need antivirus to protect your computer... and so on.
So the best antivirus that suits to your system and hardware configuration, and what it depends on user's choice, whichever you like.
The Council is this, create a backup of your system and dance from her., Sampling and testing any product..
VITYA_KOLYADENKO
I think you are not quite right, so as I understand from the snapshot copied from some foreign forum, and Kasperych Domestic and in spite of the advertising., Foreign software publishers is not considered a supported product.
And Symantec, many software publishers antivirus is false, and therefore not recognized.
So is there no Dr.Web. Because in most cases, Dr. Web. and Microsoft Security Essentials., Considered almost part of the operating system.
Mitsu Rju
Funny about AVG, I suddenly knew. He standard does not consider the files .dat malware (able to be infected). Examples of such viruses: Backdoor.Win32.YouTube music Downloader.ef (.p and other) infection has been known for over 3 years, the main working files - secupdat.dat in c:\Windows\System32\secupdat.dat and c:\Users\%UserName%\secupdat.dat - PE-Crypt.XorPE.
For the worst cases - infection of all folders in Documents and Settings\ and WINDOWS\system32\config\systemprofile\.. beast Often associated with c:\windows\system32\drivers\*.sys - Rootkit.Win32.Pakes.zo (Downloader.Generic9.NBF or other names) AVG.