The work of the graphics card
Hi all.Recently I bought a video card RX580 https://www.regard.ru/catalog/tovar251923.htm Plus komplektuhi are the following:
https://www.asus.com/ru/Motherboards/P8H77V/ - motherboard
https://www.ulmart.ru/goods/337746 percent
https://www.regard.ru/catalog/tovar165793.htm - RAM
sometimes I play warface, and so and surprisingly the graphics card gives a small FPS. Resolution 2560*1440 on the highest settings the FPS in the game about 100, although given the fact that the game is junk and iron less regulations, I think should pull a lot more fps than 100.
2nd question msi afterburner shows that the card is loaded under 100%, but RAM eats only 1 GB out of 8 GB.
Who can tell what's the catch?
The driver vidyuhi put all new off site.
However, if I put graphics on medium or low the fps a little bit added, although the idea is to grow a lot....
Load the percent approximately 50-60%
Ilya516
1) Download the graphics card - an indication that the graphical part of the game to squeeze out the graphics card everything is possible. Therefore, reduce your graphical component to get bolshy FPS, which in the end will rest on the CPU (again if the card is not under 100%). Resolution, textures, grecheskie chips, antialiasing, shadows, light cut, and polite more FPS.
2) the Memory and graphics core, well, nothing to do. Most of the work with the graphics part executes the core of the graphics card. And the memory, how much you need and be involved (we have same RAM is the main computing force, and the processor, right?).
3) When You reduce graphics, follow download graphics and more. If you have no video card, the processor, rested in its performance. Because FPS is a consequence of the effective work of the CPU with the game engine, and then the graphics card.
kind of funny, here's the RX 470 and 6700k, and like the numbers:
Video
I believe that it is a weak processor, 6700k easy with the RX 470 is pulled, when both processors 2500, I3 6100 and i5-3330 gave less stable FPS. Your same example there.
Take care of this matter. Performance on the flow and frequency.
P. S. the Resolution the same should be reduced for higher FPS.
Hellhound_Anger
Yes, I see it is necessary to change percents, because it does not drag. I'd get a gaming monitor at 2K and 144 Hz so you can was the norm to sit in the games. Have the entire system in exchange for the 1151 socket with the same percent...
Ilya516
1) 2560x1440 is 2.5 k resolution (1024*2,5 = 2560).
2) 1151 v2, mean. Check the facts on the forum of the game (trust but verify). Write on it: http://forums.playground.ru/warface section problems with the subtitle the CPU - the game. Or in the other groups.
I have not played this game. Perhaps there is the time of the setting of the game. Somewhere I noted in the comments under the video: to switch the frequency of the monitor to 144 Hz.
the same percent... - an unacceptable concept.
Hellhound_Anger
Hellhound_Anger wrote:
1) 2560x1440 is 2.5 k resolution (1024*2,5 = 2560).
Actually, the term 2K resolution introduced to compare with 1080p and according to your delirium the usual full HD resolution is almost 2K because 1920/1024=1.87 And about the resolution of 2560x1440 it is not 2 times more as 1080p in 1.7777. And I'm just wondering why in your delirium you take it wide for the size of the resolution? ie .do you think it's all equal 1K resolution 1024х100=1024х1000=1024х1=1K ))))))
MagicHero
I can't figure out is, why invent excuses? All have long been written and marked:
4k standard OR 1024*4 = 4096. 4k reduced to the 16:9 - 3840 (3,8 k), which result from: Ultra HD. 2k - 2048. 1920 - pared down to the 16:9 or as rendered in FullHD.
All just because. To spend more time will not. Google. Who should they know. All the other excuses.
Why not think vertically - different standards aspect ratio of the screen.
That is what, 2.5 k - 1024*2,5. After all is considered, try to tocalculate may work.
2560х1080 / 2560x1440 / 2560 x 1600 / 2560h1920 .
Hellhound_Anger
Now show me the table where it says about your nonsense about 2.5 K 2.5 K because the resolution is nothing like 1440p standard, but you show me exactly 2.5 K )))))))))))
it is likely that the processor is not able to pump the card via the interface of the CPF, the expression for the current CPU Mat Board
however, a very small probability. if there is 100% utilization of the card so most likely not drawn card
finally, the logic is something like this what if the map uploaded by 60-80% the case most likely in all Pushnoy of the computer. if like 80 and above download chip it is possible to refer to the game code and processor with its bandwidth.
so, the easiest way of monitoring and numbers to drive the game in lowest resolution at respectable settings itself. if the situation nikakmi way does not change the fact the graphics card is probably not being
MunchkiN 616
As the video card can't pull this Obskoy game? The example above is just a video from YouTube that guy with the RX470 on high settings playing with 150 fps. And my RX580 more productive than RX470, it should give more FPS
Ilya516
And you resolution look? he's got a 1080p and you have a 1440p (580-I'm not that much faster and 470-in the region of 20% -25%) i.e. the load on vidyuhi at least one and a half times more and it does not bother you?? + 580-I have at the moment is considered to have a medium performance graphics card, and the performance as 1066-I from NVIDIA.
The processor is not weak, turbo to 3.6 MHz. it is enough for 2560-1440 144Гц. Almost two years playing on this monitor. Iron was i5-4590 , gtx970, 8Gb. of RAM. Now the i7-4790k, gtx1070, 16GB. of RAM. FPS went up 20 to 50 units. the Game is gta5 took 2.5 GB. VRAM on past the gland and on the new 2.5 but sees 8GB. He needs to reinstall Windows (clean), Mat.cost to reflash.