Help with choosing Monica beg

doesn't say how much dough it
and so for people to pitch entertainment can be cheap
https://www.computeruniverse.ru/products/90697040/iiyama-g-master-gb2760qsu-b1-red-eagle.asp
iiyama G-Master GB2760QSU-B1 Red Eagle
or watch a variety of similar monitor with the best matrix IPA IPS, VA, MVA with a strong brightness as suggested above
honestly speaking why 240 fps monitor I don't understand because it is unlikely that the server processes requests faster than 90 100фпс

nanq
Dumb to take Monique over the hill, you no broken pixels are not checked, nor the highlights.
Find the test sets Monica (there are many foreign sites), they will not without jambs. Choose regarding test results. I chose based on reliable colors. And you may have other selection criteria.
MunchkiN 616
Why monitor for strong brightness? The norm is 120 m2 on KND, and there is 350-400 (in fact, on the test there is not so).
Or you large numbers is an indicator of coolness?

Ryazancev
neonati chance usually like flat grafoner at mid settings and monitors with a high coverage of the RSL in my experience eating the dark areas if the brightness in the region of 250. that is with a high luminosity is likely to be all the possible glow and the gaps and the lower colors of the spectrum will be more bright and contrast and be able to see better without resorting to manual calibration

MunchkiN 616
Sorry, didn't know that you're a specialist, I guess to calibrate the monitors for 15 years??
With such brightness it is advisable to wear 2 pairs of sunglasses. You then he tried to sit with a brightness of 200 candelas per meter square or just La-La-La. Everyone I know at brightness approx. 200 the eye flow for 15 min.
With good ambient light add brightness to 150, the above - too much (for normal people).
The rest is marketing. I have 30% of 250 (in fact, the real maximum of around 220) and my woman says it's too bright.
Brightness has little effect on clipping dark shades of gray, most often it is the wrong gamma (much less than the 2.2).
Any Monique and the TV should be set (calibrated), horror hotel, I've seen it.

honestly speaking why 240 fps monitor I don't understand because it is unlikely that the server processes requests faster than 90 100фпс
I mean did not understand

nanq
Monitor over the hill-cat's in the bag. The monitors have a tolerance for broken pixels (no treated) may be lucky maybe not, still risks from transportation. For 240 Hz. 1080-Oh is small. Now is the best option for the money Monitor LCD DELL S2716DG 27 black and silver [2716-4381] 35 million (drawbacks - no built-in speakers, the control buttons are bad, when you press the monitor moves ) like they have ASUSом matrix are the same.

An__ei
For gaming the Dell will go, and the rest is not very. Here is his test https://3dnews.ru/931322/page-2.html

people please answer, very big difference between 1 and 4 MS, was just wondering if aypies to take but there is 4 MS, whether strongly it will affect the speed in shooters

nanq
There is a real time response is much greater. I have a passport IPS to 4 MS, and 12 MS average. Here is what they write on the manufacturer's website
RESPONSE TIME (GTG TYPICAL)-14ms
RESPONSE TIME (GTG W / OD)-7ms
(Some colors more, some less)
Ie what is written in the passport in store, and har-Ah - it's not. It is necessary to look tests of specific models (And that can be Flex cables when you rotate the camera.).
Do not forget about input lag. If Input lag and response times (their sum) < 35 MS, the delay is imperceptible even for professional gamers. For a normal person this statistic approx. 50 MS. (As far as I remember, might be a little wrong)
If to bother with input lag, it is necessary to take the top gaming mouse, keyboard, etc. all This gives a certain win for prof players in First Person Shuter(s).
IPS have better color rendition, but has its shoals. There are monitors that all figure normal set up (problems with klepinger dark grey and colors in General). Be careful to choose, be sure to look at tests and check for dead pixels and illumination (in the dark).

Ryazancev
about the pixels clearly but the glare they will still

nanq
Just highlights there are a quarter of the screen and more. I so much horror had seen, when buyers did not check the screens in the store (in the dark).

karoche I've decided to buy a pg258q say fu it's tnka of fulacht hmm BUT there Adna milisecond response and 240ГЕРЦ O_O

Alo people decide to take pg258q write what think about it

nanq
Garbage

An__ei wrote:
Monitor LCD DELL 27 S2716DG
With-Ki it Bugatti. Dell if to take, only top, that is ultra sharp. Bugatti does not make sense to take, and others watch the monitors, and even other matrices.

nanq
Take not go wrong. ))
Spoiler

as the weak you help with the choice of Monica fling of practical advice how to choose the pros cons of more active guys not like the borax thing and year

nanq

Desativada Matrix - can 9 bit differences are not strong
Full HD per eye
OLED is more expensive
well, the diagonal of the taste and color.
Contrast PA - decent, but then dark scenes will be and nifiga not understand.
120Герц for galaz is no longer worth it.

PS I Have a TV as a monitor should.
The hospital hooked up via HDMI to the TV and play to the fullest from the couch.
It is easier than doing Nasice 10GB LAN, Switches, Routers, fiber, chassis, network card and everything to see on TV and film 4K 60fps 3D BlueRay with 200GB size ) to an apple Tv or other device.

D1_ wrote:
Desativada Matrix - can 9 bit differences are not strong
D1_ wrote:
OLED is more expensive
D1_ wrote:
Contrast PA - decent, but then dark scenes will be and nifiga not understand.
This subtle trolling??
You're in the control shkolotoy on your TV play? Normal?
You have a 3D passive, striped (celestrone)?

Ryazancev wrote:
You have a 3D passive, striped (celestrone)?
At Passive there is no synchronization with the glasses, so Active is preferable and is what I took.
Ryazancev wrote:
You're in the control shkolotoy on your TV play? Normal?
Not bad. I have a table and sometimes carry back the keyboard and most wireless. (thanks to the big room)
Ryazancev wrote:
This subtle trolling?
No, Troling if I called instead of the Qled oled )
And so it is a thoughtful step to select a display.