Developers does not allow religion to make normal AK-103 (Far Cry 5)
But if Izhmash will submit to the court?So do the original Kalash.
Any real guns need a license. The license is expensive, plus not all holders consent to the use, or unreasonable requests show. All this is difficult, in short, everything in the headstock rests. It at us in Russia everywhere violate copyright, and over the hill, it's a very complex litigation and extensive experience. Also in the game all the cars have real names, though it is perfectly clear that for the stamps.
andreasdubrovsky
Sense what you write here, and They won't see it. Write here with pictures of them. They will answer you I think. EA means money Milen, and they can afford normal Kalash. Can license it expensive.
ColonelJason wrote:
manufacturers of cheap vodkas
That's right. So we can safely say that 90% of Russia pirates game. And the current 10% buy. And no sense to make it blue Kalash. The bourgeoisie, and so shavayut. Give at least voice was Russian, and that soon it will not.
in the game two AK? what's wrong?
the problem is copyright and license.
similarly named cars in any way the original and a little different.
andreasdubrovsky
Rissotto just don't want dragged through the courts, most likely.
And in battle the normal AK due to the fact that DICE brought Izhmash money advance.
the majority of players not interested in where the Kalash is growing shutter
then the main thing in games is the story
To create the original in any game you need to buy a license from the manufacturer, it is not enough therefore developed and make a poor excuse aka)
ShiHou
Not all cars have real names : there is an ATV brand Polaris , so this is a real brand of Quad .
andreasdubrovsky
andreasdubrovsky wrote:
why dice did in the normal battle Kalash
Probably because the copyrights were obtained in 2014 and are not retroactive, but in new games anymore, or rather you can, but not all, so for example AK and AKM under copyrights not covered
The expert the Armory,read! And understand so that it is not Russian Kalash in the game!
Watch and enjoy. All of this is real sold in the United States commercial variations of the AK, they are represented in the game. It is logical that they are from a nearby eatery weapons fall into the hands of local, rather than the AKM, which right now, except that it remains in the warehouses of some of Somalia and in the Museum of the Soviet Army.
koles47
__Anonymous__
All true, but still need to add that to licensing issues they would have, as our Kalash is not patented in the United States (and therefore sculpt all sorts of copies without problems). And weapons in the game basically just theirs. And they did not put the last their Kalash ( http://gunsforum.com/uploads/gallery/album_137/gallery_19_137_30616.jpg ), obviously because he just patented. If anyone knows Kalashnikov USA is irrelevant to our country.
andreasdubrovsky
also enrage clumsy names in games, but what to do children do not care what they shoot in video games, they do not even distinguish..
And maybe an AK 47 in the game because officially, in the USA you cannot perform a Kalash? Just here talking about buying licenses and so on. The last Ghost Recon or The Divisiin played? There and AK is 12, and 74. Developed just decided not to make imbalance in the game and added nelitsenzionnuyu a copy of the AK IMHO.