The choice of processor v.7
In this topic we choose processors.Before ask question, it's highly recommended to read the theme FAQ: Processors
Do not forget about the rules of the forum.
Old topic here
Received an offer to swap my i7 3820 for the e5 2687w v2, the config in the profile. Is it worth it?
Haven't watched the actuality of iron, but very surprised the price is average i5 8400 22 kilorubley)). Like watching the spring, were 14 at the time that the prices of the other components has not changed much, what sobssno happened, the deficit if and when the collapse to an adequate limit?)
I recently bought AMD Ryzen 3 2200G BOX in Regarde it about 8500r. out. Clocked his GPU (VEGA 8). In the tanks (WoT) played on medium settings 50-60 fps. Brakes and the Frisians was observed. Operatives DDR4 2x8's, also overclocked from 2400 to 3200. Under vidyuhi 2 GB in the BIOS allocated from the volume of operatives.
POLKOVNIK2005
Спойлерhttp://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-2600K-vs-Intel-Xeon-E5-2687W-0/621vsm8860
New process technology. The coupe is more powerful. But 8 cores, high power consumption and heat. Weak overclocking potential. A poor exchange, for 8 cores / 16 threads are more expensive than Your i7, why it drained so, that's an interesting question. The idea for today is good. But it's better to build a new iron.
Read:1) https://www.anandtech.com/show/7852/intel-xeon-e52697-v2-and-xeon-e52687w-v2-review-12-and-8-cores/5
2) http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-vs-Intel-Xeon-E5-2687W-0/3915vsm8860
Honestly, I don't even know how You play with i7 3280 and GTX 1080ti. The processor is the weak point, if he gives 60 frames, especially in new products. Kseon would have looked far more confident. Performance per core they are more or less comparable. Xeona always been more like workhorses, server percent, of course, no one bothers to play.
BIG_CrasheR
Artificial scarcity (lack of supply of Intel chips will run until the middle of next year). There are no fortune tellers, all only news. Alternative 8400 - 2600 from AMD.
Alexey_Gamer
Spoiler
VOVAN WOLF
Here are the results, I think is not so bad.
UserBenchmarks: Game 114%, Desk 73%, Work 61%
CPU: Intel Core i7-3820 - 79.7%
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti - 151.6%
SSD: Sandisk 240GB 240 GB PLUS - 43.2%
HDD: WD Black 1.5 TB (2010) - 72%
HDD: Seagate ST1000LM010-9YH146 1TB - 34.1%
RAM: Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB - 94.1%
MBD: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA
POLKOVNIK2005
I have not the percent selected. His legacy option intel xeon e5-2687w0 on theseprocesses 32nm. So, carefully. Compare, definitely e5 2687w v2 is an obvious win in any situation, in addition to good acceleration / power consumption and heat.
Spoiler
VOVAN WOLF
Yes, I understand. My friend suggested + 32 operatives for 18 rubles or exchange for a 1070 for a fee. or take 3930к for 10 rubles
Someone tell me how to overclock my processor,system profile? Exactly where in the BIOS to change.
Bigalex78
Everything is detailed online, here is the article:
Спойлерhttps://www.hardwareluxx.ru/index.php/artikel/hardware/prozessoren/43494-coffee-lake-overclocking-check.html
Read, understand. Above all else, don't forget cooling for overclocking need good cooler. Take option a moderate acceleration of 4.4-4.6, for a start.
Hmm... now that's what I tomoderately forum to death...
And it is only going to ask the people that it is better to take, Riesen 3600Х and or 2700 without X (very much the price of them delicious), and whether to chase the 570 chipset, which is something very cool now if only Vega graphics is 56 and from quick drives only the old SSD to 250GB
And then a deathly silence...
Ryazancev
And the lack of 4 threads on the 3600 is not much to say in applications requiring frantic cyclopropene, and I was faced with the fact that FX already does not pull calculations in Solidworks=( and 16GB of RAM is already extremely lacking, it will have 32 gig to put
SUSUL1
But at least take x3950 with 64 GB. Just have a distinct watershed between 3600 (for games) and 3900x for work.
For Games 3600, and 16 GB of RAM 3200-3600 MHz cl16-17.
You did not write the purpose of the PC application.
Perhaps the ONLY TREDRIPPER 2990wx need, we are here not Vanga.
3600 in kernel in 2 times more productive - topotek Ficus 8590+SMT is a little better than Intel HT. Approximately In 2 times will be better FX-a, depending on settings and Boost the RAM.
Ryazancev
Tradepar would be just gorgeous, he is very much roads, and the computer - home universal for gaming and for work
So I can not understand, on the one hand 2700 has more threads, but at 3600 frequency slightly higher and the core is more powerful
And tests shoved 2700Х and 3600=(
SUSUL1
In megapolice they are +- equal in odnopolie 3600 better (ZEN+ 8 core something which will be better, but not everywhere). The conclusion is obvious. If you need more, or wait for 3700 or diplacini 10,000 for 3700x.
SUSUL1
They are not equal 2700 better as more threads in Abobe Premier, 7-zip,Blender and so on !
https://mightygadget.co.uk/amd-ryzen-5-3600-vs-amd-ryzen-7-2700x-zen-2-destroys-zen-in-geekbench/
And not 8 threads because they are equal, but it is not an indicator at all )))
X_ray_83
That is, if you play in the dispersal and display 2700 in frequency 2700Х, multipiece it will be somewhat better?
SUSUL1
In multipiece Vaughn and 1700 3.9 applications better, and it's not much then acceleration.
SUSUL1
Here test all the same, then it is important the number of threads !
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/SOLIDWORKS-2017-AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-1800X-Performance-908/
Here Ryzen 1800X, in principle, values of 2700 will be a little higher.
X_ray_83
OO, spacebase you for this test need!
Still need 8 cores to take...Wait then it is 3700. see tests and price and then considering all the pros decide which one to take, but something tells me that the 2700 in price will dramatically drop and will be out of competition with a lag of just 10%