CPU usage at 100% -- i5-4460 (Call of Duty: WWII)
How can you do this??Guys that can advise?
D18K
GTX 780 (not ti) I understand,can vidyaha morally old,but damn I still don't believe.
D18K
And here vidyuhi? it is about percent saying.
Bro-Go game
If the percents are not dispersed then so be it. I also have a ancient percent and the acceleration to 4.2 Hz in multiplayer holds 100 fps pushing it.
MagicHero
Unfortunately,my processor is a unit,up to 3.4 GHz...and so 3.20 GHz...Navrenoe I screwed up)))with this game)
D18K
D18K wrote:
Nonsense!!! I percent the same and loaded at 70% maximum 80% in this game!
Well, if viduha not pull it all and rests. Reduce the graphics settings and the CPU will run at 100%.
D18K wrote:
And vidyuhi despite the fact that, if it is weak then percent additional tenses!
It's like a percent advanced tenses )))))))))) at least you were thinking when you wrote this nonsense?
During the game open the task Manager - performance - resource monitor - CPU - and look at the cpu percentage , which processes most of all enjoy your stone. Maybe some sort of svhost 30% eating like I had.REPEATEDLY
Bro-Go game
It's very strange, because i3 8100 loaded this game a little more than half.
Spoiler
Although TKH they are practically identical.
Spoiler
Spoiler
There are 2 options:
1)some garbage got in the comp
2), Or Intel deliberately understates the performance of my old CPU(via updates visible or chipset drivers).
D18K
D18K wrote:
Vidyuhi loaded at the same 85-90%! Never mind!
That merged in the bushes? if the gland ZERO why is that there to start writing??? Especially killed by the phrase that if the none is weak it increases the load on the PERC ))) I wrote above, put them all to minimal, turn off the plane, Yes and also the driver don't forget to disable the plane (default is adaptive), and you will have CPU usage at 100%. Although the options are not loading the CPU at 99%, provided that not depends on the graphics card because for example sometimes there may be a problem in the lack of speed of RAM and multi-core procedures (especially the more threads) where the growth of nuclei leads to a large complexity to load percents on 99% because of unrealistic difficulty to make a program that would be so perfect rasparallelivanie. But I explain it makes no sense, still do not understand.
gennaz
gennaz wrote:
It's very strange, because i3 8100 loaded this game a little more than half.
OMG well, if in the gland, ZERO, why, WHY, WHY write something??? in the video you gave everything depends on the graphics card. I mentioned to another that already explains but he seems to have a shortage of try to understand it, but what's there to understand???
gennaz wrote:
There are 2 options:
1)some garbage got in the comp
2), Or Intel deliberately understates the performance of my old CPU(via updates visible or chipset drivers).
There is no 3rd option, you gland do not understand the problem in full load graphics card.
gennaz wrote:
Although TKH they are practically identical.
Where are they the same??? have 8100 frequency in turboboost much higher, works with DDR 4 RAM and like the other architecture cofilin even on the same frequency will do aswel. Better hardware does not write.
MagicHero
in the video you gave everything depends on the graphics card.
Oh really))))) It is even 2 % underutilized!
Here in my case depends on the graphics card,but CPU is not loaded 100%
Spoiler
So where is the logic in your words? It turns out I percent also needs to be loaded on 100%?)))
Bro-Go game Looked monitoring , it turns out that in multiplayer , my CPU (I5 3470 3.4 Hz analog your ) also loaded on 100% , and fps graph and the frame half is pretty stable . The same situacija in battlefield ( even part 3 battlefield eats it under a hundred ) . Conclusion - this is normal.
Bro-Go game
If you want some free CPU ... turn it down as geometry , postoperati I. TP that is, settings that first and foremost turn to the resources of the cpu. In the settings of the Nvidia control Panel , under"configure PhysX to paragraph Processor change the value of the CPU to the GPU
Bro-Go game
Download of of percent to 100% is quite normal, provided that it does not overheat and in the background is nothing more eats CPU power. So a 4 core is not enough.
GrafDmitry
I'll try,fail,remove nafig nerves me more..And so,if the case,I regretted of course,that the money is spent.
Thank you all,you are the best!
Bro-Go game
I regretted of course,that the money is spent.
At the game or on the CPU?
The game is perfectly optimized, but the i5 4460 is not pulling the game,and is 10t.R.
And the situation is completely different with the fx 8300,copes with the game.
Spoiler
Loaded slightly more than 50% and is 6, 5 T. R.
Question: Why take expensive and fuflovy percent when there is a cheap and efficient?
Oh yeah! I'm not talking about the dips FUфиксов in 90% of games ( since he was the owner of a 6300 ) cooling system , which will have to become generous in the case of raising of frequencies exceeding 4 Hz , and what is happening in single-threaded projects....oooo.....swallows red competitor , even the i3 Sandy Bridge....visual comparison , i5 in stock. To draw conclusions on the basis of the indicators one , two games is stupid.
gennaz
gennaz wrote:
Oh really))))) It is even 2 % underutilized!
Here in my case depends on the graphics card,but CPU is not loaded 100%
So where is the logic in your words? It turns out I percent also needs to be loaded on 100%?)))
OMG I wrote above, if in the gland ZERO why continue to write something? If you have the basic things I can not understand ))) I like Russian wrote that even a child of 6 years will understand that if there is a complete download of a video card that percent is idle and Vice versa. If you really postaratsa you can try to get a result that is 99% downloaded and vidyuha percent but in the course of the game is still the odds will shift in some direction.
gennaz wrote:
At the game or on the CPU?
The game is perfectly optimized, but the i5 4460 is not pulling the game,and is 10t.R.
And the situation is completely different with the fx 8300,copes with the game.
Loaded slightly more than 50% and is 6, 5 T. R.
Question: Why take expensive and fuflovy percent when there is a cheap and efficient?
Above about I percent, with a large number of threads and wrote that they download to 99% even harder but I think why this is happening to you objasnjat pointless, you even the basic things do not understand. Well, in dogonku to download your try my ancient 4 mass percent gives the multiplayer almost stable 100 fps, your of video 8 stream a hundred keeps and in addition much fps jumps. When it starts firing and increases the load on the Prots he even restricts 1050ти ( in multiplayer where running a lot more players would be even sadder) and about your question, the Answer is: where do you see here more productive percent?
So again, do not understand do not write more nonsense.
GrafDmitry
Another stupidity from the fabulous ...., compare 8 cores and 4 cores. And the courage to compare 8-core Intel those times with 4-core Intel enough? I doubt it.Incorrect, ignorant comparison.
I'm not talking about the dips FUфиксов 90% of the games - Waiting for a list of games, really want to see him, with proof, ALL THOSE 90% games.
PS The funny thing is that the CPU 2012, still excites the minds of fans of Intel. i5 4-core in office suit, all from i5-2300 to i5 7600k, and merge them for the 3-6 thousand, no good in new games. But the FX get reluctant.
Bro-Go game
No doubt. But only as a counterpart competitor Haswel i3/ive bridge/Sanndy.