Need a monitor with g-sync 27\" IPS

With this budget you need to consider some sort of noble Eizo, not sherpotrep you mentioned.

and why eizo reward would be bigger? sorry to ask, wondering.. why do not other manufacturers, benq, Samsung? and why views sherpotrep?( I understand it to mean) just busy stand, norms, and the house too views, not the latest model, but works well...

Gera95 wrote:
Between playing in 120фпс, or playing with HDR10, PremierColor, X-rite, Rec.2020, etc. personally, I will choose the latter.
A question of priorities. Gamers in competitions on what Monique play? For those who have a good response and refresh rate. Especially true for dynamic games that require the player a good response. I think that's what guided the engineers.
Revered read more about AHVA, indeed, is not an option for working with graphics.

MuSStafA wrote:
Revered read more about AHVA, indeed, is not an option for working with graphics.
That's just buying a good monitor is not necessarily by default mean that the person will be with the graphics work. All the same, he's got good color rendition, in addition to performance about which there has been a lot said. 55к it's not a big budget for normal Monica, so you can understand the difficulty of choosing.

MuSStafA wrote:
Gamers in competitions on what Monique play?
And you home take part in the competitions? )
If I ever piss head banging, and I zasobiralas some cyber competitions, then maybe I'll buy the productive monitor. Home it why.

around2 wrote:
what graphics work.
Where are the graphics? I bought it not for gaming. What it is, you can edit photos, etc., is ips by default.
Just for comparison, the top OFFICIAL screenshot, at the bottom of my:
Spoiler

Although the comparison is certainly not correct, official 1080p, but it is somewhere mentioned, as was soap soap compared to 4K. While he is sitting on 1080 do not notice, like the picture is normal, I think no soap, after running 4K sharply it turns out that this is not so. :)
And the old monitor I have is also ips UltraSharp U2412, but put them together, and the old UltraSharp goes into the closet, maybe in a year of famine will come in handy. Just no comparison, although both are ips, both UltraSharp, but one another 1080 to 4K.

Gera95
The second skin isn't in 4K resolution and in General is not clear the format of the parties. And in order to play at 4K resolution have a couple of GTX 1080ti and not everybody can afford. And if you have a 980ti and 4K resolution is bdsm something. Play with lags, freezes and at best 30 fps on ultra )))

MagicHero wrote:
The second skin isn't in 4K resolution and in General is not clear the format of the parties.
He is in 4K resolution, native format, the parties 3840x2160, weight screenshot 47Мб.
Curl, actually a bad feeling. :)

Gera95
I don't understand what you're all about the kind of jealousy you write??? what is envy??? and the fact that some ride gerarchico, have yachts, villas I do have to hang with envy )))))))))
The skin that you posted in full screen format has a strange aspect ratio, you yourself opened it and looked?
And I kind of wrote on the case that if you bought a 4K monitor, then to him you still have to buy a couple of GTX 1080ti to play the game with stable 60 fps, in your case, play with the lag and 30 fps but a good picture some bdsm.

MagicHero wrote:
then to him you still have to buy a couple of GTX 1080ti to play the game with stable 60 fps, in your case, play with the lag and 30 fps
As it turned out, many of you here go talk about 30фпс, and that does not pull. :)))
It is not clear why only two 1080ti? I have on the motherboard and six slots for cards, why not six 1080ti?
Buy all you'll see. And yet...

Gera95
MagicHero

he is a fool does not understand the gland, all advises to buy computers for 100k

Gera95
Gera95 wrote:
It is not clear why only two 1080ti?
Because this is the minimum for 4K resolution and 60 fps with ultra settings. And the fact that 3 or more graphics cards 1080ti won't work in games, officially no more than two, so it is not necessary to write something in this case zero. Also, in some games even 2 GTX 1080ti will not be enough for ultra settings and 60 fps in 4K resolution, but if you cut off antialising that in General the optimal choice. And some games do not support sli so that work is only one graphics card.

Gera95 wrote:
It is not clear why only two 1080ti? I have on the motherboard and six slots for cards, why not six 1080ti?
sure? there is still likely to be only two ports to keep the pci-e x 16, what to monitor, the CS will miss my piece of iron at 60+fps, all the rest where not enough resolution smaller will do the business then. Besides XG2703-GS more advise nothing? (I mean not ASUS, Philips etc and specific model)

Justaz wrote:
there is still likely to be only two ports to keep the pci-e x 16
This is a rhetorical sarcasm was. They are all six pci-e 3, and six 1080ti to deliver, would be the bad head and the money for it. :)
Just man writes some nonsense.

Justaz wrote:
Besides XG2703-GS more advise nothing?
I didn't recommend it. With monitors the situation for optimal Full HD 24-inch, all good monitors made under this diagonal. There is more diagonal, but, at the same budget Dell is a S-CI.
A good monitor 27' you will find, choose any like it.
27' is the optimal diagonal for 4K, all fit models are available under this diagonal.
So, personally, I see no reason to look for consumer goods 27'1080p, and 55к if you can look on the same diagonal 4K.
Limited to palliative, 2K, I do not see sense to purchase experience in the con of the monitor 900p, still ended buying the full Full HD.
The essence of the top of the post was this.

Gera95 wrote:
27' is the optimal diagonal for 4K, all fit models are available under this diagonal.
Please explain your personal understanding of optimality.
СпойлерUltraHD (4K) - cheap Samsung U28E590D (28 inch), solid BenQ BL2711U (28 inches), a huge 328P6VJEBT Philips (32 inch) and also gigantic Iiyama ProLite X4071UHSU-1 (40 inches). It is worth noting that all 4K monitors with a screen diagonal up to 32 inches inclusive have a very fine grain that allows images and photos to be very crisp, but the menu text and other elements in most old and some new programs will be almost unreadable, and the zoom, especially in Windows 7, gives a significant distortion, so buy this monitor only if you do not intend to work in old programs. And only at a diagonal of 40 inches and above will be more or less comfortable to work with all programs, but to turn my head before such a huge monitor is not everyone will like it. It is also worth considering that to connect a 4K display to a computer you must have DisplayPort 1.2/HDMI 2.0 or above and high-quality cable, and that for modern games at native resolution requires a very powerful graphics card (GeForce 1070 and above) and powerful processor (Intel i7-7700 and above).
source http://www.dxdigitals.info/2014/08/vibor-monitora.html

Ryazancev wrote:
Please explain your personal understanding of optimality.
Optimality is the price of quality, so kind of always was. :)
The same NEC category Premium, have a diagonal of 31.5' and a price of 250-320к rubles.
The price of Apple is better not to look, in order to avoid cultural shock. :))
What you have written is utter crapola. In older games there are issues with the display. In the new, already support 4K resolution, no problem. In the same Fallout 4, all is normally displayed.

Gera95
Dear friend, in my spoiler, there is no word about the game. There is written about the size of the text. I have experienced this and for me it is disgusting. Very annoying small text everywhere, and at masturbirovala various bugs crawl out the Windows (10kA latest revision).
I wanted to convey that not everyone shares your subjective opinion on the optimal.
Please do not kick, this is my subjective opinion (IMHO)

Ryazancev wrote:
10kA last revision
This is also a subjective desire, isn't it? :)
On seven normal everything looks, with the standard scalability.

Gera95
My personal opinion is that 4K FOR the 27 Inches is excessive and not optimal. Unless you sit right next to the monitor (very close). And why to buy a professional monitor with 100% ADOBE RGB for games (60 Hz, a large real response time).
I guess that you haven't even calibrated!?

Ryazancev wrote:
I guess that you haven't even calibrated!?
Why?
I have a Dell monitor, UltraSharp, factory calibrated, configured with TrueColor, why should it be calibrated? That would just lose it, with his own hands? :)))
Perhaps you have never good the monitor was not, well it is necessary to aspire. Good then, good that quality.

Ryazancev wrote:
My personal opinion is that 4K FOR the 27 Inches is excessive and not optimal.
In my subjective opinion, the best balance is difficult to imagine.
Diagonal 27 more shitty approach to the role of a monitor, sit him behind a Desk is not convenient. With 4K resolution, you just put the scaling to 200% and not have any problems (with the possible exception of a few programs that need using compatibility settings forced to put down scaling). In games that don't support 4K you put 1080p and get a full HD 27 monitor.
And redundancy is covered appearance of the fonts finally 10 years later as I moved from CRT monitors to TFT I can look at them without pain.
Ryazancev wrote:
I guess that you haven't even calibrated!?
No special device, the price of which is approximately 150$ starts, it is better not to mock the monitors.