FX 8320E
Hi all,question to those in the know will reveal whether the FX 8320E to videokate 1060 GTX 3GB?Maybe in theory, where there FKH and strong but not.
And my percent was overclocked to 3.7 and 2.8 in the tests.
-Zion-
and????? in all normal games, which see more than 2 cores FX faster... and you won't believe it is also possible to disperse) something where the i7 faster due to flow... but then again with 8 production 8350 he's got parity...
-Zion-
Lol, are you even old games would have found bark 1 generation Gnidenko the bottom. Sendic much fitter, and in most games with 2016го fx8300 is on par with 2600к, and some where to 6700 approaching.
siriyss
motherboard take this, from the gigs that you want, the power subsystem is weak, the radiator is too small, especially not play with wasmerely of fofix, a maximum of 4 GHz across the cores and the memory to 2133 almost no chasing. I know from personal experience.
Владимир2012
Владимир2012 wrote:
fx8300 is on par with 2600к, and some where to 6700 approaching.
Okay... Here is telling tales. Love PG.
Vinni-Pukh
On
Spoiler
Fofix 8300 to 4.5 GHz with memory 1866/2133 the word dual cpu and nb 2400-2600, almost all the fresh games gives 60+ frames, which is more than enough considering its price.
Владимир2012
Владимир2012 wrote:
On
And for what you did to me the same tests? Lol.
By the way, I never saw 8350 catches up 6700К, it even in most of the tests have not caught up with 2600К, it turns out you're lying to me.
Cool game you choose, 9590 ahead in the Duma 5960 , lol. Immediately visible to prepay AMD developers.
Vinni-Pukh
Orthodox acceleration of the bus gives you a boost.
Vinni-Pukh wrote:
Cool game you choose, 9590 ahead in the Duma 5960 , lol. Immediately visible to prepay AMD developers.
Lol, so the intol and nividia you can prepay, and AMD not?
Владимир2012
Владимир2012 wrote:
Lol, so the intol and nividia you can prepay, and AMD not?
Because it's funny. You know, 5960Х rolled any FX.
Владимир2012 wrote:
Orthodox acceleration of the bus gives you a boost.
But Intel does not accelerate ? i7 2600K uchityvaet in stock 8350, the only thing there maybe it 9590К 4.7 GHz with a TDP of 220 horse, lol, and in most games 2600К cooler. And this despite the fact that still a good 2600К take 5.2 GHz. And you're still going 6700К to catch up. Lol.
Владимир2012
Владимир2012 wrote:
almost all the fresh games
Well, Yes, lol. He's in all the games in 2016 ate is catching up with the i5 2500K, that's it LOL!
Vinni-Pukh
Dispersal of Severniy and memory equates with 8300 6700 in stock. Now compare the price 6700к and topicsa. 2600к is a bit more expensive, but only used. The ratio of fps/the price of topicsa more attractive.
Look at the 9590, any 83хх takes the same 4.7, again overclocking the memory gives more than GHz-s
Владимир2012
Владимир2012 wrote:
Dispersal of Severniy and memory equates with 8300 6700 in stock.
But the 6700 does not accelerate ? 6700К is possible for the multiplier to hit 4.6-5.0 GHz. If a simple 6700 on the bus.
Владимир2012 wrote:
Now compare the price 6700к and topicsa.
Lol. So let's compare the 9590 ? He at the time of exit cost 380 bucks.
Владимир2012 wrote:
2600к is a bit more expensive, but only used.
2600К cost by 28% than the 8350. Of course the 8350 is cheap now, because he is as old as Callas mammoth. Better to overpay for 6700К to disperse, and not praying that the game will normally go for the 8350
I have an 8350 overclocked to 4.8, reveals гтх780 normal in sly, under the percent for 60 fps in almost all games can be 1080ти to put through the tests with 1080 normal in nearly all games 60+fps, given that I put in-sink included, that have enough head
Vinni-Pukh wrote:
But the 6700 does not accelerate ? 6700К is possible for the multiplier to hit 4.6-5.0 GHz. If a simple 6700 on the bus
Well, if a person has too much 20K, then of course, do take 6700к and not worried.
Vinni-Pukh wrote:
Lol. So let's compare the 9590 ? He at the time of exit cost 380 bucks.
9590 is the same 8300.
Vinni-Pukh wrote:
Better to overpay for 6700К to disperse
WELL FUCKING MYSELF to pay 4 times for +20-30% performance! Which tries not needed in a particular case, all rests in 1060.
Владимир2012
Владимир2012 wrote:
to pay 4 times for +20-30% performance!
Where in 4 ? Lol. Exactly two times. Just you bad with math. Syndrome AMD.
Владимир2012 wrote:
Well, if a person has too much 20K, then of course, do take 6700к and not worried.
10,000 you wanted to say.
KUNGFU
In order that it is possible to disperse in the tests, there are 9590. I have the same many of the games were 60fps and more, but I was talking specifically about GTA, and was still NID Faure AIDS, even if we ignore all that stuff then it is clear that they are approximately level, and it shows on tests, not really are you so sure that FKH direct is so powerful that it is possible to dispute this? Many times from owners of FKH heard that there is microfreeze though he pulls of the game but there are micro freezes and other shalupen. I also have a lot of small problems was my CPU overclocking was at the level of the i5 2500.
Unlike all seater testers on the Internet and YouTube, I had a similar comp and now a new one, and I clearly see all of the nuances, I just wanted a person to share their experience.
This processor is not for the 1060, will not disclose it to the full. People think that if the percent of ship none 100% then he opened it, and in fact nifiga he didn't make her.
Vinni-Pukh
Vinni-Pukh wrote:
Where in 4 ? Lol. Twice
What are you insinuating? Skazanul hot, a hell much more expensive. 6700 - 20K + norms mother on the Z170 8-10K, 8320е - 6K + rules mother 6K (for example, the same msi 970a gaming), ahlad the same.
-Zion - wrote:
This processor is not for the 1060, will not disclose it to the full.
Maybe a symbiosis of graphics card+CPU reveals it the same motherboard where it actually works? About the quality of RAM/PSU/hard drive, if to look in General the same can probably be silent if it is so obvious?
Ruprecht Klinsmann
It is obvious that this topic is components thumb 20 years and not when such questions no one had, tests, motherboards and memory are a dime a dozen, and the hdd only boot time is affected and not on fps well, maybe with rare exceptions in the form of fallout 4, so all that you have listed fit into the 5%. With such questions you only yesterday for the first time the computer saw? Thousands of times it is tested, tested.